similar to: questions about upgrading

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "questions about upgrading"

2008 Jul 23
3
sum each row and output results
Hello, I have the following data frame (DF): V5 V5.1 V5.2 V5.3 V5.4 V5.5 2 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677 -6498.7183 3 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677 -6498.7183 4 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677 -6498.7183 5 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677
2010 May 17
2
Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5
Hi all, I'm getting a segmentation fault with yum when I try to update a CentOS v5.4 install to v5.5. What I've done: * Ran yum clean all. * Ran yum update yum* * Ran yum update, and got the segmentation fault. * Yum suggested running with option --skip-broken, which I did. Still got the segmentation fault. * Rebooted machine and ran yum update again. Segmentation fault... * Googled
2019 Dec 12
2
[PATCH] vhost/vsock: accept only packets with the right dst_cid
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:56:26AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 01:36:24PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:03:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the > > >
2019 Dec 12
2
[PATCH] vhost/vsock: accept only packets with the right dst_cid
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:03:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the > > src_cid is correct, but we forgot to check the dst_cid. > > > > The host should accept only packets where dst_cid is > > equal to the host CID. > > >
2019 Dec 12
2
[PATCH] vhost/vsock: accept only packets with the right dst_cid
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:03:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the > > src_cid is correct, but we forgot to check the dst_cid. > > > > The host should accept only packets where dst_cid is > > equal to the host CID. > > >
2019 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v7 0/9] drm: cec: convert DRM drivers to the new notifier API
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Hi all, > Hi Hans. > The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. > > If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 > yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it > to drm-misc, then please review and
2019 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v7 0/9] drm: cec: convert DRM drivers to the new notifier API
Hi Dariusz, Hans, I can apply the dw-hdmi patches if necessary. Neil On 19/08/2019 11:38, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. > > If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 > yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it > to drm-misc, then please
2008 Jul 23
1
Sample on dataframe
Hi I'm looking for solution or function which I can use to sample data frame, to obtain new (smaller) data frame similar to sample() function Jarek Jasiewicz
2011 Feb 21
2
problem joining WinXP machine to samba PDC+LDAP environment
Hello, I can't join a winxp box to my samba domain. I just have one samba server, meant to act as a PDC for domain='CHI'. Any ideas how to troubleshoot and/or remedy? Thanks, Jon Context: ------------ samba v3.3.8 on CentOS v5.5, using ldapsam backend. Domainname ='CHI'. smbldap-tools v0.9.6. I 'populated' the ldap with 'smbldap-populate'. I try to join
2010 Jun 08
3
Question on trying to build R 2.11.1 on Tru64(aka OSF1) system
Hello, I am trying to build the R-2.11.1 software for university faculty to use in research projects on a DEC/Compaq/HP AlphaServer model GS160 16CPU/64GB memory running Tru64Unix aka OSF1 version 5.1B-5. Is it known whether it is possible to build the R-2.11.1 software on the platform I am using? In my attempts to build the R-2.11.1 software, I first used the native C and Fortran 77/90/95
2009 Oct 15
2
CentOS build scripts (or equivalent) acessible?
from [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? > Is that a big problem for the people who write the code and have every > revision preserved for posterity (and for others to learn from) in a > public revision control system? > I'm not sure that I understand. Is there indeed such a public repository of the build scriptds / RPM specs used by CentOS? That would indeed be fascinating and useful
2012 May 10
2
when is the o.s. considered to be at a certain minor version? Or, is it safe to apply only certain package updates from the next release version?
Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x or 6.x) : 1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release? Typically, when you install you are getting a package set available from a specific minor release number. But what minor release is the o.s. at if I just update the centos-release package, and no other package? Typically, a 'yum
2009 Nov 01
1
Contributing to the Wiki for Mactel and desktop
Hello, I just registered to the wiki under the login: MathieuBaudier I'm currently testing a lot CentOS (see below: To introduce myself quickly) and although I target server deployments, I have also spent some time configuring desktops. I went through some of the pain and I would have been happy to share it with other through the wiki. Especially: - I configured a fairly recent MacBook Pro
2019 Dec 20
1
Tracking down severe regression in 5.3-rc4/5.4 for TU116 - assistance needed
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 03:38:10PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Let's add Mika and Rafael, as they were responsible for that commit. > Mika/Rafael - any ideas? The commit in question is > > 0617bdede5114a0002298b12cd0ca2b0cfd0395d This seems to be Revert "PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec" Can you try v5.5-rcX without any additional changes? It
2020 Jan 16
1
[PATCH v6 5/6] nouveau: use new mmu interval notifiers
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:16:30PM -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote: > Can you point me to the latest ODP code? Seems like my understanding is > quite off. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5-rc6/source/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c Look for the word 'implicit' mlx5_ib_invalidate_range() releases the interval_notifier when there are no populated shadow PTEs in its leaf
2020 Mar 03
1
[PATCH v1 02/11] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotplug
Hi David, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.6-rc4 next-20200302] [cannot apply to linux/master mmotm/master] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the base tree in git
2020 Feb 20
1
[PATCH] nv50_disp_chan_mthd: ensure mthd is not NULL
Hi Fr?d?ric, It appears Ben made his own version of this patch (probably based on the one you added to the kernel bz), and it's already upstream: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.6-rc2&id=0e6176c6d286316e9431b4f695940cfac4ffe6c2 Cheers, -ilia On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:19 PM Fr?d?ric Pierret <frederic.pierret at qubes-os.org>
2002 Jan 16
2
Ogg compared to MPC and AAC
In researching Ogg Vorbis, I have started to become aware of many other audio formats I never knew about, such as FLAK. Well, today I have become aware of two other formats I hadn't heard of before: MPC and AAC. Can anyone tell me what they think of these formats in comparison to Ogg Vorbis? If anyone considers this Off-Topic, please feel free to email me personally. I'm not trying to
2020 Apr 13
2
Build regressions/improvements in v5.7-rc1
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in > v5.7-rc1[1] compared to v5.6[2]. > > Summarized: > - build errors: +132/-3 > - build warnings: +257/-79 > > Happy fixing! ;-) > > Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service. > > [1]
2020 Apr 13
2
Build regressions/improvements in v5.7-rc1
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in > v5.7-rc1[1] compared to v5.6[2]. > > Summarized: > - build errors: +132/-3 > - build warnings: +257/-79 > > Happy fixing! ;-) > > Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service. > > [1]