similar to: lftp mirror replication

i've maintained a local centos repository at work using rsync, but it seems the corp honchos have decided to block rsync at our firewall, plus its never been 100% reliable, I'd get aborts on protocol errors sometimes several times before pulling down a complete new distro update. i'm trying to figure out how to do this with lftp, and its got me somewhat stymied. I'm testing

On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: > > Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have > a number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so > I'd like to do a final update before the tree moves. may I suggest building your own mirror well before then, update it with rsync or lftp weekly (or even daily), from

On 3/27/2015 1:27 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> oh. is /7/ supposed to be a symlink to /7.0.1406/ or a separate >> >directory ? it appears my mirroring of the mirror may be broken if >> >its supposed to be a symlink. >> > >> >in /7.0.1406/, I'm seeing files up to Feb 22. > /7/ is a link to the latest release, which at this point in timeis 7.0.1406.

On 3/27/2015 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >> I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the >> CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit >> 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no >> difference. I >> have noticed that I do have some updated

On 3/6/2015 10:51 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > For some time I've fiddled with Debian and Ubuntu LTS. There's one > really nice feature for local networks: apt-cacher, a package proxy > for APT. > > My company is in the remote South French countryside, and more often > than not, schools and public libraries only have some very limited > Internet access with

On 02/03/17 19:50, James Hogarth wrote: > On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: >> >> Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a >> number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so I'd like >> to do a final update before

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:29:07PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:56:26PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > So the question is: Is that behaviour can be considered as an lftp bug or not ? Hello again, Just answering to myself and the list for a conclusion. lftp in CentOS uses the default priority provided by gnutls and it's not possible to override it in

On 08/02/2016 06:11 AM, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am writing on that mailing list because I have an issue using lftp and I would > love to have more infos about features available on the LFTP version provided by > CentOS 6. > > I try to connect to a ftp server in secured mode using FTPS explicit and I would > love to use TLSv1.2. > > After

Hello again! I have this piece od code: ##################### #lftp will make the backup lftp -u user,password -e "mirror --reverse --delete --only-newer --verbose /var/bkp /test_bkp" somehost.com >> $LOGFILE # end log file date >> $LOGFILE echo "Backup Completo!" >> $LOGFILE ##################### Everything is fine, but the bash scrip dosn't complete

As you might know, LFTP is a popular FTP/SFTP command-line client for most systems. One feature that is lacking from this tool is the ability to do a globbed ls via sftp. I have a patch ready for LFTP that incorporates some of the knowledge [like oddball systems glob() handling] and some of the code from sftp-glob.c for this tool to add this capability. I do, however, have some questions about

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0156 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0156.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0fa29e430e78f3df7739ae7534a61e7534da5f0f1f1435909fe9c3fed39c02c2 lftp-4.0.9-1.el6_5.1.i686.rpm 14afd576b489a45446911c0672f733b0ba03435a22d4362849915d173e5226bb

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0793 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0793.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b0bd2688031fc57327e6f421c9fbd6c8cd5a8bc0f9b323cb3aae8852f209e4e5 lftp-4.0.9-6.el6.i686.rpm f3b6f43c1938941dd274558d5f329837530929933aac7fd412b24a7c12b7ce01

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1405 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1405.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d8041c3a9f61587a42ff479156751198a57d1fdc970f5a019b43a39a7b61902e lftp-4.0.9-6.el6_8.2.i686.rpm f668cb9d616b16b3dd352664110d4df2792075db082f602ce556cfae9ebed7fc

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:2003 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2003.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f4f7155f12afa2cdcb6e0b260f4295fded485aadd1771ff650efaf9992613f11 lftp-4.0.9-6.el6_8.3.i686.rpm bcb5757539fd2b5f39a191ef9121e9fdc8d13bc5145f30bb1c53cb55b1160fa6

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0040 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0040.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: bf0451919bffe8f45288ff806cda98dc5a0ecb96ce3509518751a3e71d28299e lftp-4.0.9-6.el6_8.4.i686.rpm db635751773fbe039b1d77d1e7b0b23ab10cceb51882bda64b941bc33bedb757

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:36:02AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The latest lftp in CentOS-6.8 is version: lftp-4.0.9-6.el6_8.2. It was > built on July 12, 2016. > > That was built with nss-3.21.0-8.el6 in the build root. > > If you have the latest installed, it would seem that it should be able > to work. > Hello Johnny, Thanks for your answer. On my system, I'm

Greetings, I have written a script using lftp to mirror one directory from a ftp site. I do not have access to the server except for being a humble user. This is running on a fully updated Centos 5.3 box. I am using whatever is provided by the repositories. I noticed that lftp consumes almost all of cpu times I found this while searching for a solution.

On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: > > Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a > number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so I'd like > to do a final update before the tree moves. > may I suggest building your own mirror well

On 03/02/2017 12:42 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: > On 02/03/17 19:50, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: >>> >>> Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a >>> number of installations that need to

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0068 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0068.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 9169bacf8f317b15d97c52fcb90f4e406c1a9d27f3fdeaa458d885821de6c860 lftp-4.4.8-8.el7_3.2.i686.rpm