similar to: Selinux extra packages and compiled apps

Hello All I noticed same minor imperfection on Samba4 How To page. Installation on CentOS6. I did as below : For RedHat 6.x: $ yum install gtkhtml setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemange-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl-devel libsepol-devel libattr-devel

I'm running into trouble while setting up samba4 on centos 6.4 see #yum install -y libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel python-devel gdb pkgconfig krb5-workstation zlib-devel setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemanage-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl-devel

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:53:33 -0300 Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com> wrote: > >You say you have compiled Samba yourself, so I take it that Samba is > i>nstalled at /usr/local/samba, if so, is the new samba in your PATH > i>and > >are there any OS Samba packages installed ? > I compile myself. I removed all packets for samba before start the >

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:09:46 -0300 Maiquel Consalter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Folks, > i tryed make some tests, but the problem it the same. Someone have > some idea how i solve my problem ? I try the new instalation, upgrade > all packates but before 1 minute the process still in 100% and the > process is rpc_server. > You say you have compiled

Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ I was thinking either running a sum on the directory or each file...but thinking a simple date check would be fine. The idea is web application, except the uploads area for photos, never has changes to its files except when I change it. However, if it gets

> >You say you have compiled Samba yourself, so I take it that Samba is > i>nstalled at /usr/local/samba, if so, is the new samba in your PATH > i>and > >are there any OS Samba packages installed ? > I compile myself. I removed all packets for samba before start the > instalation. > My options: ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ > --mandir=/usr/share/man/

Hello, I have been running Samba4 on a Ubuntu 12.10 for a few months. Using this setup script, I have also been using PBIS (Open-wise 7.1) to connect Linux clients to it. I have has this setup for serveral months. Now if I connect to a windows computer I get access denied and it still works on linux via PBIS. If I login to the windows computer with a local account, I can

>You say you have compiled Samba yourself, so I take it that Samba is i>nstalled at /usr/local/samba, if so, is the new samba in your PATH and >are there any OS Samba packages installed ? I compile myself. I removed all packets for samba before start the instalation. My options: ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --mandir=/usr/share/man/ --enable-debug --enable-selftest && make

Hi, Wiki username is: GaryTierney I'd like to add some additional content to the HowTos/SELinux wiki page. More specifically: additional tips on troubleshooting SELinux problems using setools-console and audit utils, using Role-Based Access Control instead of the default unconfined user configuration, and some pointers on authoring local policies (some content specifically for the new

Bind and use rpmvercmp to compare versions of packages when sorting them, instead of an own string-based comparison function. --- src/librpm-c.c | 12 ++++++++++++ src/librpm.ml | 1 + src/librpm.mli | 1 + src/rpm.ml | 2 +- 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/librpm-c.c b/src/librpm-c.c index 1ae3bad..fc847d6 100644 --- a/src/librpm-c.c +++

> m.roth at 5-cent.us kirjoitti 11.5.2018 kello 22.52: > > Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and dead >> as a brick. >> >> Luckily GRUB still works and booting the to the next option in boot menu >> succeeds. >> >> How can this be? This OS is assumed to be

> Jari Fredriksson <jarif at iki.fi> kirjoitti 12.5.2018 kello 11.39: > > > >> m.roth at 5-cent.us kirjoitti 11.5.2018 kello 22.52: >> >> Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> Hello all. >>> >>> I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and dead >>> as a brick. >>> >>> Luckily GRUB still

I have done some printf profiling and found that supermin's calls to dpkg for individual packages are quite expensive. Here are some patches that gather all information on demand where possible. On my Debian/unstable-based workstation at home, preparing a minimal appliance using $ ./supermin --use-installed --prepare bash -o supermin.d now takes ~3.5s (previously ~15s). Turning that

I'll jump in here to say we'll try your suggestion, but I guess what's not been mentioned is that we get the setroubleshoot abrt's only a few times a day, but we're getting 10000s of setroubleshoot messages in /var/log/messages a day. e.g. Dec 2 10:03:55 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:00 server audispd: last message repeated 199 times Dec 2

Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and: -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc I'll send the audit log on to Dan. Cheers, John On 2 December 2014 at 16:10, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > Could you send me a copy of your audit.log. > > You should not be

We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be sufficient -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 15:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing I am not sure. I was

Hi, this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems. Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point. Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm

When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled in permissive mode we receive a large number of entries in the audit.log and setroubleshootd randomly crashes with the following error, We have resolved the selinux alerts by following the troubleshooting steps

Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we were getting. John On 3 December 2014 at 10:01, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like turning on three booleans will solve most of the problem.

I hadn't paid attention when one or two folks recently posted this, but it's hit us, also: $ sealert -l d1655210-f43c-4737-98dc-86b6aac82bb6 Entity: line 53: parser error : Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding ! Bytes: 0x99 0x3C 0x2F 0x74 <tpath>`</tpath> ^ failed to connect to server: xmlParseDoc() failed I tried reinstalling