similar to: RSpecOnRails - setup or context_setup?

Greetings all. I''m looking over a ''greenfield'' pasture, and enjoying the TDD(BDD) process of creation. I''m currently rspec''ing a finite state machine (acts_as_state_machine). As such, I need to persist the model through ''specifies'' within the context - from top to bottom. I have bumped into a couple of probs: 1. context_setup

It seems that if an S4 class has no slots it can't be instantiated because it is assumed to be virtual. Is there a way around this other than adding a do-nothing slot? A singleton would be OK, though is not essential. Problem: EmptyFitResult <- setClass("EmptyFitResult", representation=representation()) # also tried it without the second argument. same result. > e <-

Hello! I have a lot of contexts for testing Rails controllers, that must do something like ''session[:logged_in] = true'' in their setup. How can this be refactored? In unit tests I would simply create a LoggedInControllerTest base class, that all my functional tests would derive from. And another small question: In my controller specifications I often have to decide whether to

I fired up the debugger and watched the code happen tonight. The problem occurs if the config.action_controller.perform_caching = true in your environment. It''s not set to true in development but it is set to true in production and staging. The problem occurs not in my controllers but in sweeping.rb (part of rails). Rails calls this code for every controller which was instantiated in

Is there a reason that RecordKeeper:: getAllDerivedDefinitions(...) implementation accesses the global Records instance instead of just referencing itself? As far as I can tell from the usage: 1) Records has the linkage as extern RecordKeeper Records in Record.h 2) Is instantiated as a global in TableGen 3) All llvm uses of getAllDerivedDefinitions SEEM to be manifested as a message to this

On Dec 9, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Garrison Venn wrote: > Is there a reason that RecordKeeper:: getAllDerivedDefinitions(...) implementation > accesses the global Records instance instead of just referencing itself? > > As far as I can tell from the usage: > > 1) Records has the linkage as extern RecordKeeper Records in Record.h > 2) Is instantiated as a global in TableGen >

I''m trying to add some per-object behaviors to objects descended from ActiveRecord, by using after_initialize() and instance_eval(), like this: def after_initialize self.instance_eval(File.read(''customers/default.rb'')) end (Ultimately the file path will be dynamic, this is just proof of concept.) default.rb just contains a few method definitions like this one: def

Thanks, Martin, that (inherit from a virtual class) worked great. I already had a base class created with setUnion, and so this was an easy switch. I had assumed that since inheriting from a class without slots would produce a class without slots the result would still be virtual. Fortunately that's not the case. Ross ________________________________________ From: Martin Morgan

Attached patch for removing for the first trivial RecordKeeper:: getAllDerivedDefinitions(...) dependency on the global RecordKeeper Records instance. The real work will be removing this dependency from the other Record.h classes/structs, and from TGParser. Thinking this would be implemented as some sort of context structure/class holding a RecordKeeper instance passed to TGParser which in turn

Hey Chris, Ok, so I'm working on creating this trivial patch, for starters, but I'm trying to identify a controlled unit test for tblgen. So all of the following test tblgen to various extents: 1) make 2) make unittests 3) make // with clang and 4) make check // which I'm avoiding Since I'm just starting to understand tblgen, I'm not comfortable with any of these

I am having some problems with variable scoping. I need to be able to set a variable that is accessable by other methods within the class (or instance) (i.e not global). An example is 2 pages that change a class variable: class AjtestController < ApplicationController def initialize @@variable = "init" end def show @display = @@variable @@variable = "change 1"

Thanks for the patch! I'll clean this up, convert your sample to a unit test, and commit it for 2.7. On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Olivier Meurant <meurant.olivier at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction ! > I'm not using the JIT in lazy mode, but it was fun to understand the > lazy-stub code. > > Attached you will

Thanks Jeffrey ! If possible, keep me inform (on revision number), I'm interested to see how you will do the unit test. (For my future patch... :) ). Thanks again. Olivier. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com>wrote: > Thanks for the patch! I'll clean this up, convert your sample to a > unit test, and commit it for 2.7. > > On Sun,

Supervisors: Dr Alex Singleton; Professor Chris Brunsdon Industrial Partner: Office for National Statistics Applicants are invited for a PhD studentship at the University of Liverpool within the ESRC North West DTC. The studentship will be supervised by Dr Alex Singleton and Professor Chris Brunsdon in the Department of Geography and Planning; and is being conducted in collaboration with the

Hey, I just ran into a situation where I would like to expect a method call with an argument I know and another one, which is a random number. I think mocking up the rand method is somehow ugly so I thought maybe this is the first time where I can take something from Java to Ruby ;) Java''s EasyMock mocking library knows things like "anyObject()" and "anyInteger()" in

Two questions for you all... 1. I have an admin section to a site I''m building. Here''s the pertinent bit of the layout that all controllers are using: <div id="main-content"> <%= @content_for_layout %> </div> <div id="sidebar"> </div> I''m using @content_for_layout to display various controller actions such as new,

We're seeking interns for the summer of 2014 here at Barron's the Dow Jones newsweekly that's searched out good investments and financial frauds since 1921, when our founder exposed Charles Ponzi. We're at the center of the financial world in New York and can pay a bit of a stipend to cover the city's high living costs. Here's the blurb: Do some good. Intern at

Hi, I am having a routing problem and can''t figure out why its happing. I have added the following line in my routing.rb file. map.connect ''name/:id'', :controller => ''controller_name'', :action => ''action_name'' When I use http://domain.com/controller_name/action_name/id then it works fine on the local machine using webrick

Morten, The leaks.patch file introduced a static destructor ordering problem which lead to garbled output. The comment above those lines of code indicates why it needs to be the way it is. My bad for committing it in the first place. Please be careful in the future. Reid. On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 05:30, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Hi, > > here are some minor patches that for various reasons

Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for pointing me in the right direction ! I'm not using the JIT in lazy mode, but it was fun to understand the lazy-stub code. Attached you will find a patch which follow your 1st option : a map Stub_address -> JITResolver instance, except that the used map is a "std::map" to apply the same upper_bound trick as in the map CallSiteToFunctionMap of the