similar to: dealing with spoofing

Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is unique and not used for anything else. I'd distinguish this from spam sent to the mailing list itself, which is obviously different. Is there anything further that could be done to prevent this? -- Dave

Over the weekend one of our servers at a remote location was hammered by an IP originating in mainland China. This attack was only noteworthy in that it attempted to connect to our pop3 service. We have long had an IP throttle on ssh connections to discourage this sort of thing. But I had not considered the possibility that other services were equally at risk. Researching this on the web does

Has anyone here been able to view Netflix movies on CentOS? (It requires Internet Explorer, and I'm wondering what the workaround is for Firefox) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080502/6ace912b/attachment.html>

Today I discovered that voicemail attachments are not working on our latest asterisk server (version 1.4.24.1). I have two other asterisk servers that I maintain but I didn?t do the configuration on these so this is my first time that I have done the voicemail.conf. I get an email but there is no attachment. Maybe there is something else I need to configure that I don?t know about? Here is my

Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote: > Your IP address is flagged as spam in Real Time Block Lists. Are you > using a dynamic IP address? You may have a mis-configured server that is > allowing spammers to relay through your server. Another possibility is > your system is compromised with a spambot. > Why are you top-posting? And another reason it may be blocked is the same reason *I* get

Jason i think you have misread me Im not saying that the phpBB system would have spam runing through it Im saying that on this list serv someone is spaming. They are not spamming to the list they are spamming email accounts instead. I have used phpBB and it works just fine both from a user and an admin end. i would prefer it for THIS reason but there are still reasons i would NOT like to use it.

Anyone use livevoip? opinions? -- JD Austin Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC email: jd@twingeckos.com http://www.twingeckos.com phone/fax: 480.422.1250

hello everybody i?m trying to connect to my postgresql via tcpip and it thow an error is not accepting tcp-ip connections I ask to google but i dont find the solution, people said about the prostgresql.conf enable tcpip, I try but when i start the service it thow an error. Other thing is add the option i to postmaster.opt but when i start the service this file is redefined anybody can helpme

I'm about to start working on range extension thunks in lld. This is an attempt to summarize the approach I'd like to take and what the impact will be on lld outside of thunks. I'm interested if anyone has any constraints the approach will break, alternative suggestions, or is working on something I'll need to take account of? I expect range extension thunks to be important for

Support Requests item #1813, was opened at 2005-04-20 23:48 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=412&aid=1813&group_id=85 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Copeland (tom) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Merely a test Initial Comment: Hm, did this go to to win32utils-devel? Tom

Hello Rui, Thanks for the comments - Synthetic sections and rewriting relocations I think that this would definitely be worth trying. It should remove the need for thunks to be represented in the core data structures, and would allow . It would also mean that we wouldn't have to associate symbols with thunks as the relocations would directly target the thunks. ARM interworking makes reusing

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> Hello Rui, >> >> Thanks for the comments >> >> - Synthetic sections and rewriting relocations >> I think that this would definitely be worth trying. It should

Just a warning to dovecot listmembers. The list is being harvested. test3943395 is a unique address I created only for communication to the dovecot list. The following spam came from: Received: from dial-dynamic-62-69-52-187.surfdial.murphx.net (dial-dynamic-62-69-52-187.surfdial.murphx.net [62.69.52.187]) by sasami.anime.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id j7FLxtv03775 for

After looking at this for a while, I do not think that this problem is NP-hard. With a finite "short branch" displacement k, I was not able to come up with a gadget that could create global constraints as would be needed to e.g. model an instance of 3SAT or vertex cover in terms of this problem. The problem is hard though. I believe that it is likely to be exponential in the "short

First of all thanks for finding the bug. I agree with Rui that right now we can manage without general thunk infrastructure. Let's provide at least a few "thunk" implementation and after that reconsider necessity of common thunk framework. As to MIPS there is one more type of thunk (keyword is .MIPS.stubs) and one more optimization of current thunk (putting a thunk in the beginning

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-1968795515-1164715405=:5670 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT You need to re-install packages when you update R, as it says in the rw-FAQ. Use update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE) to

Admin please remove this person. he keeps spamming the list -----Original Message----- From: tino@augsburg.net [mailto:tino@augsburg.net] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:53 AM To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] Re: Submited (004756-3463) Please see the attached file.

I've been working on supporting ARM/Thumb interworking thunks in LLD and have encountered a limitation that I think it is worth bringing up in a wider context. This is all LLD specific, apologies if I've abused llvm-dev here. TL;DR summary: - Thunks in lld may not work if they are added to InputSections that have already been scanned. - There is a short term fix, but in the longer term I

Guys, I'm completely stuck, so asking for advice. My user has a sieve script which checks message header if it contains words in russian like '???? ???????????? ?????????'. Pritty simple script # rule:[??????????] if allof (header :contains "subject" "LDS (robot): ???? ???????????? ?????????", header :contains "from" "noreply at

Alex: Any idea why the list is still bouncing these? "noreply at rubyforge.org" is in the list of addresses that are supposed to be allowed to post even though not subscribed. What is that about "Message has implicit destination"??? Kevin -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Wxruby-development post from noreply at rubyforge.org requires approval Date: Sat, 21 Oct