similar to: LINUX kernel segment error 6

We have several DELL R900 server with PERC 6/E adapter in it. O.S. is CENTOS 5.5. recently one of server continue pop-up messages on /var/log/message for switch status between "write back" and "write through". ============================== Dec 6 08:09:31 host01 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2189 The controller write policy has been changed to Write Back.:

we have CENTOS 4.X on DELL server and one one of virtual disk include 4 disk configure as REID5 (one more disk for hot spare). I saw /var/log/messages file have: Aug 4 06:27:02 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2094 Predictive Failure reported: Physical Disk 1:5 Controller 0, Connector 1 Aug 4 06:27:02 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2051 Physical

we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask us use "ping" and traceroute" to check. Both tools response time are good but if we connect through application like Web browser, database,

Hello, I have a dual boot with Windows 7 64 bit enterprise edition and Opensolaris build 134. This is on Sun Ultra 40 M1 workstation. Three hard drives, 2 in ZFS mirror, 1 is shared with Windows. Last 2 days I was working in Windows. I didn''t touch the hard drives in any way except I once opened Disk Management to figure out why a external USB hard drive is not being listed.

So, when you add a log device to a pool, it initiates a resilver. What is it actually doing, though? Isn''t the slog a copy of the in-memory intent log? Wouldn''t it just simply replicate the data that''s in the other log, checked against what''s in RAM? And presumably there isn''t that much data in the slog so there isn''t that much to check? Or

I know that this has been well-discussed already, but it''s been a few months - WD caviars with mpt/mpt_sas generating lots of retryable read errors, spitting out lots of beloved " Log info 31080000 received for target" messages, and just generally not working right. (SM 836EL1 and 836TQ chassis - though I have several variations on theme depending on date of purchase: 836EL2s,

we have DELL R900 with CENTOS 5.3 in it. This DELL R900 come with one integrate PERC6/I and two PERC6/E card. DELL 6/I control 5 internal disks. The original disk sequence are: /dev/sda1 /boot /dev/sda2 / /dev/sdb1 swap ... after I configured PERC6/E disks and reboot, /dev/sda change to RAID disk and original /boot and / change to /dev/sde1 and /dev/sde2. My modprobe.conf is: alias

?I have been installed?CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following problems (even?latest patches apply): ? 1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under?CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode ? 2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under?CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode (inifinite boot loop) ? 3. DELL R900 with 128 GB RAM can only see 15 GB RAM under?CENTOS 5.2 Xen mode ? Anyone know why?? IS?CENTOS 5.2 certify with DELL server? ? Does?CENTOS

Greeting All I have create a pool that consists oh a hard disk and a ssd as a cache zpool create hdd c11t0d0p3 zpool add hdd cache c8t0d0p0 - cache device I ran an OLTP bench mark to emulate a DMBS One I ran the benchmark, the pool started create the database file on the ssd cache device ??????????? can any one explain why this happening ? is not L2ARC is used to absorb the evicted data

we have several DELL R900 with PERC 6/E adapter in it. R900 using Redhat Linux. Each R900 have two PERC 6/E adapter and at least two MD1000 connect to it. Configuration 1: PERC 6/E -- two MD1000 PERC 6/E -- empty Configuration 2: PERC 6/E -- MD1000 PERC 6/E -- MD1000 Normally first MD1000 for database and second MD1000 for nightly backup. My

Hello, I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64. linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%

We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory Utilization is 92.02%, crossed warning (80) or critical (90) threshold. Since server have 128 GB RAM and only 1 application. I really don't belive that. Does there

Hi all, Recently I build XEN 4.1 (from the xen.org) on centIOS 5.5 (kernel 2.6.38.4). After changing the grub file and rebooting the machine, I am continuously getting out of memory error. The content of my grub file: default=0 timeout=5 serial --unit=0 --speed=115200 terminal --timeout=10 console serial splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.38.4) root

we plan to setup our ORACLE database server (32 bits DB) and use dell r900 server. This server can put up to 128GB RAM. We are thinking use 32 bits CENTOS 4.7 or 5.2. My concern about CENTOS 5.2 is it only support up to 16 GB RAM on 32 bits O.S. Any suggestion? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hi, I have found this strange problem. I'm working with Debian 6, dovecot 2.1.9 and vpopmail-auth. LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first message arrive "dovecot-lda" return a "Segmentation fault", the message is written to the user's Mailbox but the message remains, also, in the queue of qmail (deferral: Segmentation_fault/) and at the

we have several R900 servers with PERC 6/E card in it. Recently it we getting some message on /var/log/message say change to "write back" and change back to "write through". We figure out it is PERC 6/E card battery weak. My questions are: 1. some battery only use one year (some even shorter) and already this problem. 2. How come PERC 5/E does not have this issue? 3.

? ????????? ?? Sunday 16 August 2020 07:20:18 Ilia Mirkin ???????(?): > Well, if it's easy, try the patches I mailed to nouveau@ for the ddx. I applied patches manually (copy-pasted patches failed to apply by git apply, probably whitespace/end of line issues), and now I see in X log (after I left machine to run alone): [ 3584.553] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid

Hi there, I have one server acting as a iscsi target running windows storage server r2 sp2 and the other server is running centos as an initiator. They are connected to a switch over a 1Gbit ethernet connection. the target is a Dell NF600 and the server running centos is a Poweredge R900. We want to move this configuration to a FC based installation using a Dell QLE2462 HBA (this is the hba we can

Hi List, I''m new on the Xen Virtual Machines world, I did a search around looking for a solution on this problem and I could find anything I''ve a new server Dell R900 (Two QuadCore 2.93Ghz, 32GB Ram) where the following message appear when I try to boot any DomU guest machine: ERROR: Not a Xen-ELF image: No ELF notes or ''__xen_guest'' section found. ERROR:

I was having problems with the same server locking up to the point I can't even get in via SSH. I've already used HTB/TC to reserve bandwidth for my SSH port but the problem now isn't an attack on the bandwidth. So I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to ensure that SSH is given cpu and i/o priority. However, so far reading seems to imply that it's probably not going