similar to: amd64_edac: probe of 0000:00:18.2 failed with error -22

Hi All, I don't know enough about when errors are *really* errors. So I google a lot to read and learn. I have a few things in my Logwatch that I want to make sure I understand 1. smartd **Unmatched Entries** Problem creating device name scan list Device /dev/sda: using '-d sat' for ATA disk behind SAT layer. Device /dev/sdb: using '-d sat' for ATA disk behind SAT layer.

Am 21.01.16 um 17:41 schrieb Jan Beulich: >>>> On 20.01.16 at 16:01, <andreas.pflug at web.de> wrote: >> Initially reported to debian >> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810964), redirected here: >> >> With AMD Opteron 6xxx processors, half of the memory controllers are >> missing from /sys/devices/system/edac/mc >> Checked

I haven't yet done as much experimentation as Andreas Pflug has, but I can confirm I'm also running into this bug with Xen 4.4.1. I've only tried Linux kernel 3.16.43, but as Dom0: EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0 AMD64 EDAC driver v3.4.0 EDAC amd64: DRAM ECC enabled. EDAC amd64: NB MCE bank disabled, set MSR 0x0000017b[4] on node 0 to enable. EDAC amd64: ECC disabled in the BIOS or no ECC

Initially reported to debian (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810964), redirected here: With AMD Opteron 6xxx processors, half of the memory controllers are missing from /sys/devices/system/edac/mc Checked with single 6120 (dual memory controller) and twin 6344 (2x dual MC), other dual-module CPUs might be affected too. Booting plain Linux (3.2, 3.16, 4.1, 4.3), all memory

Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE

Hello, every few hours I get the following message in /var/log/message: Jul 5 20:23:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 20:53:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 22:13:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 23:53:28 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 5 23:58:27 hXXX kernel: Machine check events logged Jul 6 01:38:27 hXXX kernel: Machine

Geting a seg fault. Have not investigted the cause. rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/richard$ tar vfxz ~/Downloads/ellcc-mips-linux-2014-Mar-24-07-32-26.tgz rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/richard/ellcc/bin$ gdb ./ecc GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are

This morning between 07:10 or so and 08:10 I discovered that my PC had shut itself off. I thought it was due to a power failure becuase I never turn it off without a good reason, and it had been running (and playing sounds) until it wasn't. My roommate/landlord tells me that the only anomaly he observed was that our router had lost its internet connection (via a cable modem, which was still

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:02:53AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.05.17 at 00:36, <ehem+debian at m5p.com> wrote: > > I haven't yet done as much experimentation as Andreas Pflug has, but I > > can confirm I'm also running into this bug with Xen 4.4.1. > > > > I've only tried Linux kernel 3.16.43, but as Dom0: > > > > EDAC

Is there a method to view the status of the rams ecc single or double bit errors? I would like to confirm that ecc on my xeon e5520 and ecc ram are performing their role since memtest is ambiguous. I am running memory test on a p6t6 ws, e5520 xeon, 2gb samsung ecc modules and this is what is on the screen: Chipset: Core IMC (ECC : Detect / Correct) However, further down "ECC" is

As part of my ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org), I build clang/LLVM on my native x86_64 Linux box and then use it to compile itself. For further sanity checking, I then use that copy to cross compile for other targets (arm, armeb, i386, microblaze, mips, mipsel, ppc, and x86_64). After updating to a recent TOT revision, r195452, I get a strange error when cross compiling for the i386:

Hi, I was trying to get OpenSSH portable working with my Yubikey.? A key was present on the token but generated using the ECCP384 algorithm. This lead to many obscure goose-chase red-herring error messages from OpenSSH such as the delightful "Could not add card : agent refused operation" or other nonsense that was meaningless and unhelpful. Many hours later in Mr Google's company,

Hello Has any one have any experience in ECC RAM Errors. we are seeing ECC fault Errors but I am not sure if it can be related to RAM it self or it is related to bad connection and noise. please let me know if you have a good document regarding ECC Errors, specially I want to know if data will be retransmitted when error happens. 02:00:31, Thursday, 10/11/2007 : EXCEPTION: ECC Error Interrupt

I don't know how to get both RSA and ECC cert from letsencrypt. Aki > On 30 July 2018 at 20:43 David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > What acme implementation do you use for your letsencrypt certificates? > If it's acme.sh how do you get both rsa and ecc certificates? What > configuration options are you using in your

CentOS tracks RHEL and there is something I think probably can only be done in a point release but I believe should be done. Update to nss and curl. The problem - the version of curl that ships with CentOS does not support ECC cryptography. A newer version would, but requires manual specification of the ciphers if the TLS/SSL library used (NSS on RHEL/Fedora) does not have the ECC ciphers

Like many others, I am looking to put together a SOHO NAS based on ZFS/CIFS. The plan is 6 x 1TB drives in RAIDZ2 configuration, driven via mobo with 6 SATA ports. I''ve read most, if not all, of the threads here, as well as sbredon''s excellent article on building a home NAS, yet I still have a number of unanswered questions. I was leaning heavily towards the M2N-E for a while,

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Gerald Galster wrote: > > After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending operations" have > > cleared. > > Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged (bitflip, ...)? > > Best regards, > Gerald I don't have the logs from that time them nor do I see any

At an account running 3.0.14a Debian (same account as the dual log file issue posted earlier). A user sporadically cannot update an Access mdb file and gets access denied errors. The log: [2005/09/08 12:14:31, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245) ginny opened file database/EACM & ECC Reports Secure.ldb read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=4) [2005/09/08 12:14:36, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245) ginny

At 01:54 PM 1/8/2015, John R Pierce wrote: >On 1/8/2015 11:32 AM, david wrote: >>The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a >>server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my >>environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the >>storage needed. I wonder if anyone has had experience with it, and can answer:

"Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot?" That''s a kind of radical, possibly offensive, question formula that I have lately. Reading up on theory of RAID5, I grasped the idea of the write hole (where one of the sectors of the stripe, such as the parity data, doesn''t get written - leading to invalid data upon read). In general, I think the same applies to bitrot of