similar to: Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card

Hi I am trying to install CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180 G6 which has HP Smart Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver. I have 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD and configured RAID 1+0 using System BIOS, the BIOS detects usable disk space as 940GB disk space, when i start installing the OS, it does not detect HP Smart Array B110i SATA RAID Controller Driver As per

Hello, I'm trying to install CentOS 6.0 64bit on a HP ProLiant ML110 G7 with a HP Smart Array B110i SATA RAID Controller. One logical drive (RAID 1+0) on the RAID Controller is already build. CentOS Installation can't find the logical Drive, but it shows me the zwo physical drives (sda+sdb). After searching the web, I found following hints:

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-26~bpo50+1 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I've installed the following packages an lenny, which are working well on other maschines. # dpkg -l | grep xen | grep bpo ii libxenstore3.0 4.0.1-1~bpo50+1 Xenstore communications library for Xen ii linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-686 2.6.32-26~bpo50+1 Linux 2.6.32 for modern

On 7/28/2016 3:41 PM, Fawzy Ibrahim wrote: > LSI SATA MEGARAID 95Q9 afaik, the megaraid cards are mostly all SAS, which support SATA drives, except very old ones were SCSI. Ok, I do see they had a series of MegaRAID SATA 150-xx and 300-xx cards, these were 64 bit PCI or PCI-X cards. 95Q9 does not appear to be a valid card number, 9240, 9260, 9280 are some pci-express SAS MegaRaid

John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/26/2016 10:20 AM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: >> I want to install Centos 7 latest build on NEC Server 5800/120b-2. >> >> The installation wizard fails to detect the storage connected to LSI >> SATA MegaRaid PCI. > > which megaraid card? they've made quite a lot. lspci will list the > card type... > > linux will only see storage

On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. Which kernel version? > It happens several times a day that I get a message about > > Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 > Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel:

I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. It happens several times a day that I get a message about Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret

Greetings, I''m attempting to do gfx_passthru with the primary graphics adapter (03:00.0), passing it to a guest. I can unbind it from the host but when I fire up the guest OS my monitor loses signal from the graphics card and that''s that. The GFX card is dual DVI, I''ve tried both slots. Host is Linux 2.6.32.14-1.2.105.xendom0.fc12.x86_64, Guest is Windows 7. PC is an

Hi, I have HP DL 180 G6 2U Rack Server with HP Smart Array Controller Card B110i Onboard SATA Controller Chipset. This server has 4 * 500 GB SATA HDD have configured RAID 1+0 and it shows Single Logical Drive of 940 GB Hard Disk in the RAID BIOS. Have created driver diskette using dd command to enable this controller card to the CentOS 5.6 x86_64 arch and it shows HP LOGICAL VOLUME of size 940 GB

Hello, I''m hoping someone may be able to push us in the right direction. I''m trying to get one of our products to work with the current branch of Xen (4.0/4.0.0) but I''m hitting a problem. We are currently using Xen 3.3.2 on a Sun Blade 600 chassis (with x6270 blades) this works great. But when we upgrade to Xen 4.0/4.0.1 we get the following message when

+cc: ocfs2-devel, sunil Marek, Thanks for the detailed report! Can I trouble you to file a bug at http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla ... oh, is that your report http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1339? This looks like a deadlock of some sort. I don't think your hardware configuration really matters here. We'll keep looking into it. Joel On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:22:48AM

I have a raidz2 and did a scrub, it took 8h. Then I reconnected some drives to other SATA ports, and now it takes 15h to scrub?? Why is that? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi there, I have a question regarding PCI passthrough on the Citrix XenServer 5.6 (Xen 3.4.2). I already managed to get some soundcard passed through to a Windows guest. So I think my knowledge about that topic isn''t _that_ low. But I cannot seem to pass through a SATA/PATA controller to a Linux guest. I have some additional CD/DVD burner (PATA) attached to a SATA/PATA controller

I think I finally have nailed down the problems with TFTP on the 4.10 branch, and so I have released 4.10-pre20. Please let me know if you have hardware on which 4.05/4.06-pre3 works, and 4.10-pre20 does not. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

Hi, I''ve been trying to boot stefano''s minimal dom0 kernel from git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git 2.6.36-rc1-initial-domain-v2+pat On xen-unstable, I get the following WARN_ON()''s from Xen when bringing up the NIC''s, then the machine hangs forever when trying to login either over serial or NIC. (XEN) Xen WARN at msi.c:649 (XEN) ----[

I''m trying to pass my SATA controller through to a domain and have run into a weird situation. I have two machines with the same general class of hardware (Intel PIIX) and the pass-through works on one machine but not the other. On the non-working system, the SATA controller makes port reads, but they don''t return the correct values. For example, when running it in dom0, when

How do I check if the proper sata drivers are being loaded? If they are not what can I do other then rebuilding the kernel? Thank you in advance, Randy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Wei, Quick question: Am I reading the code correctly, that even with per-device interrupt remap tables, that GSIs are accounted to the intremap table of the corresponding IOAPIC, presumably because the IOMMU sees interrupts generated as GSIs as coming from the IOAPIC? In that case, then we need all devices sharing the same IOAPIC must not have any vector collisions. Is that correct? -George

Hi list, I''ve got a system with 3 WD and 3 seagate drives. Today I got an email that zpool status indicated one of the seagate drives as REMOVED. I''ve tried clearing the error but the pool becomes faulted again. Taken out the offending drive and plugged into a windows box with seatools install. Unfortunately seatools finds nothing wrong with the drive. Windows seems to see

I have just bought a 120GB external usb drive but after plugging it in it is not getting mounted. lines from /var/log/messages: > Oct 22 18:54:49 station2 kernel: usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 > Oct 22 18:54:49 station2 kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > Oct 22 18:54:49 station2 kernel: scsi4 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage