similar to: php 5.1.6 vulnerability in CentosPlus repo

I have a Centos 4 box that has been updated all the way to 4.6 without using the centosplus repository. Now I want to use the centosplus repository for Centos 4 to get the latest LAMP, mod_perl, perl and other perl modules so that I can install rt 3.6.6 and its necessary modules. However, for some reason, the latest perl package in the centosplus repository does not appear on the radar when

With invaluable help here, I've just gotten 6.0 onto a PC. I went through the listings in PackageKit, removing things I know I'll never use; ran yum update; installed Opera; went to the epel, rpmfusion, and one whose name slips my mind (It's a new name.); enabled them all; and tried to get a lot of my regular apps : [....] Setting up Install Process No package dillo

I wish to use PostgreSQL with PHP+PDO. I haven't use PDO before. I have the php-pdo package installed on my CentOS 4.7 server: # rpm -qa |grep pdo php-pdo-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 Now when I try connect to the PostgeSQL db with this code: <?php print "PDO test<br />"; try { $db = new PDO("pgsql:host=192.168.0.180;port=5432;dbname=mydb;user=test;password=test");

Hi everyone, I have this package installed, and Apache has been sefaulting randomly on my server. I have tried to locate the fault and believe the problem may be in mod_php. However there are various posts that say that HTTPD could have an issues as well. Is anyone else having similar issues? Any feedback is welcome thanks. If httpd crashes again I should have a segfault dump and I will make

Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see support built into the included libphp module.. Thx, CC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090729/5a4b2130/attachment-0003.html>

Hi, Is there someone successfully running memcached-1.4.1 on Centos 4 with centosplus php? I'm trying to use memcached under Centos 4. I can set values fine but 'get' returns: [root at rakosnicek eshop]# php d.php PHP Warning: Memcached::get(): bad type specifier while parsing parameters in /var/www/d.php on line 6 NULL string(7) "SUCCESS" array(1) {

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:37:42PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: Noise removed. Quick question, if I may? What does this have to do with CentOS? John -- Spring is nature's way of saying, "Let's party!" -- Robin Williams (1952-), American actor and comedian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

I am doing "tar" test due to some software require "tar cvhf". When I using "tar cvhf and tar xvhf ", files have symbolic link replace by physical files. wield things is my friend using same command 'tar cvhf and tar xvhf". after restore link still there. does there has way when I using "tar cvhf" and "tar xvhf" I can get link back not

Please watch the addresses that you are responding to when mailing the list. There continue to be replies to Harald Reindl on the list. Please note that Reindl is not a subscriber to the list (and for good reason - thank you, list admins) so any mail you get from him purporting to be from the list is bogus; he sends mail to you Cc'd to the list (or vice- versa) just to get his 2-cents back

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:18:40AM -0400, mark wrote: > > Nope. Well... actually, my manager's talking about Ubuntu or maybe even > FreeBSD. He's *extremely* upset with RH being so slow - 8 should have been > out for some time, for one, and a lot of 7, even with SCL, is far behind, It should have been? Says who? John -- You may know how little God thinks of

Hi, is it possible to Restore files deleted with " rm rf " from ext4 or ext3 filesystem by mistake. Regards Ahmad

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> wrote: > > N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is > using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet. Further, no mirrors have been spotted, which is not to say there

Good morning. Might I please have edit access to the AdditionalResources/Repositories page on the wiki? Account name is JohnDennison. Thanks! John -- Humans hate to admit error even as they stand there, black and smoldering, with the stub of a cigarette in one hand, in the middle of a wide crater containing them and the remains of a sign that once read "DANGER: VOLATILE

Hi all, I know some may find this OT, so please ignore this if you think it's OT. I don't know any Linux-friendly Windows mailing lists / forums that will even bother with Linux related questions. I want to carry some data (client info, documents, photos, email, accounting stuff, etc) with me on a USB HDD, but want to encrypt it. I know one easy way to shared data between Windows &

e.g. what packages are in them, as well as other groups or group-related options which may exist... Thanks, -- Chad

I need to upgrade PHP because the latest WordPress requires one at least at 5.2.4. What are the tradeoffs of using the php53 packages provided by CentOS versus IUS? I've seen that installing the RHEL-derived php53 requires removing php first and it creates package conflicts because it doesn't provide a virtual php-common package. That suggests I should install the IUS package. Is

Hi, Is there way to subscribe centos security alerts via email? like: http://lwn.net/Alerts/CentOS/ -- Eero

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:04:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> Umm, yeah. Encrypted protocols would never be compromised.... > > Which do you think is more likely? Someone sniffing a cleartext > credential set on the wire or someone subverting an alleged "secure" >

On Jan 6, 2015, at 6:49 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:37:42PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > > Noise removed. > > Quick question, if I may? What does this have to do with CentOS? Some people are annoyed that CentOS keeps changing on them, and keep going to greater and greater lengths to try and argue that CentOS should not

Disable remi repo and try again.. 26.4.2015 11.54 ip. "Tim Dunphy" <bluethundr at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > Hey guys, > > > I'm trying to instal gd-devel onto a CentOS 7 host. > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: gd-last-devel-2.1.1-2.el7.remi.x86_64 (remi) > Requires: libvpx-devel(x86-64) > You could try using