similar to: CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

Jeff Sheltren has been providing timely and clear updates about the status of the 6.3 release: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/ They're much appreciated! Thank you very, very much. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45?38' N, 122?6' W

For those who don't follow the QA RSS, see: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/120 to get the latest info on the status of 6.2. Looks good so far!

Hello guys, we have done some progress on the new web site project. We need your comments for the design of the front page. We have 3 proposals or the design of the frontpage. Please look at them, we need your help :) http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/ Best regards, Marian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information given on this site: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax:

In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been released to QA: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/

Hi gang - Just took a look at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar/ I dont see anything on there for 6.1 Not trying to start flames and I know its ready when its ready and all that - but I was just surprised to see "nothing" on the calendar. jerry

Posted, in case you haven't seen it already: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/116 Good news.

The QA web site at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog was really helpful for those of us who were curious as to how CentOS 6.0 was coming along. However, there doesn't seem to be much information as to how CentOS 6.1 is going from either the QA web site, the forums (Announcements), or Kananbir's twitter feed -- but it may be I'm just not looking in the right place. Does the QA

Hi devs, If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an update on 6.1 on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the devs have been busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :) -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "At what point did we

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 06:45:57PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:41:52 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > We (ab)use virtio conversion functions for device-specific > > config space accesses. > > > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Rusty

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 06:45:57PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:41:52 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > We (ab)use virtio conversion functions for device-specific > > config space accesses. > > > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Rusty

Hi everybody, I have been using Shorewall for quite a while now but I recently stumbled over a new setup that stopped me cold. I don''t know how to proceed: I have an ordinary GNU/Linux box (2.6.11) connected to a nonpublic network with one interface eth0 which gets an IP through DHCP like 172.17.x.y. Traffic is not routed to the Internet in this subnet. In order to connect to the

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:54:45PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I think without the commit message I wouldn't have been able to > understand that, so Christoph, could you also add the comment below > please? I don't think this belongs into this patch. I can add it as a separate patch under your name and with your signoff if you are ok with that.

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

happy new year. a day off is a day to pick up a new project, so I wrestled my way through making ogg vorbis work on macosx. first, libao (not entirely a proper patch, but 2 source file diffs and a diff of a configure'd Makefile to one that works.): http://bolson.org/pub/libao-0.8.2-diff.tar.gz libogg and libvorbis compiled without incident. vorbis-tools were more complicated. I think

happy new year. a day off is a day to pick up a new project, so I wrestled my way through making ogg vorbis work on macosx. first, libao (not entirely a proper patch, but 2 source file diffs and a diff of a configure'd Makefile to one that works.): http://bolson.org/pub/libao-0.8.2-diff.tar.gz libogg and libvorbis compiled without incident. vorbis-tools were more complicated. I think

Splitting the previous serie in two. This part contains assembly code changes required for PIE but without any direct dependencies with the rest of the patchset. Changes: - patch v8 (assembly): - Fix issues in crypto changes (thanks to Eric Biggers). - Remove unnecessary jump table change. - Change author and signoff to chromium email address. - patch v7 (assembly): - Split patchset

Splitting the previous serie in two. This part contains assembly code changes required for PIE but without any direct dependencies with the rest of the patchset. Changes: - patch v8 (assembly): - Fix issues in crypto changes (thanks to Eric Biggers). - Remove unnecessary jump table change. - Change author and signoff to chromium email address. - patch v7 (assembly): - Split patchset

On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > See: > > > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13873 > > > and > > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-March/222141.html > > > These seem related, if not the same. They are, a bit more investigation, reveals why this has

Hi Centos Team, I was here the hard days in which CentOS 6 appeared would never appear, and then was CentOS 5.6 (maybe 5.7...do not remember well) that struggled to see the light and I was very afraid CentOS would not survive... but as I was worried in the past actually I'm very impressed of the speed of latest releases: what has changed? Just out of curiosity... Thanks for your hard work