Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "ext4 in CentOS 5.6?"
2014 Apr 03
2
RFC: slow-down option
Hello,
I've been using rsync on some backup servers for years. In 2011 we had a situation where the FS of the backup server was
behaving strange, even thou there was enough available I/O, the fs(ext4 on 16TB partition with a lot of inodes) was
lagging. After much testing we found that rsync was hammering the fs too hard.
At that point I patched rsync to add a stupid option which will sleep
2011 Mar 30
1
ksplice within CentOS
Hello guys,
I saw that a few days back there was a talk about encorporating the ksplice
toolchain into CentOS and creating rebootless upgrades to the CentOS kernel.
I'm really interested in helping for that.
Where/how we can start work ?
Best regards,
Marian Marinov
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type:
2011 Apr 04
6
sshd: Authentication Failures: 137 Time(s)
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent
--update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 --name SSH --rsource -j DROP
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent --set
--name SSH --rsource
And this is part of logwatch:
sshd:
Authentication Failures:
unknown
2011 May 14
2
Apache in chroot reporting every client is 16.0.0.0
Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed
a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon
further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost
also reports 16.0.0.0.
Google is not being my friend right now, any advice?
Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp
In the chroot:
httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4
2011 Apr 12
17
40TB File System Recommendations
Hello All
I have a brand spanking new 40TB Hardware Raid6 array to play around
with. I am looking for recommendations for which filesystem to use. I am
trying not to break this up into multiple file systems as we are going
to use it for backups. Other factors is performance and reliability.
CentOS 5.6
array is /dev/sdb
So here is what I have tried so far
reiserfs is limited to 16TB
ext4
2010 Jun 02
1
Is zerofree or resize2fs applicable to ext4?
Hi all,
Can I ask if zerofree or resize2fs could also be applicable to ext4? Guestfish help of these two commands indicates that they are applicable to ext2/3. But ext4 is not covered in the help. However, I have tested these two commands in my Fedora 12 laptop, and it seems that both commands work well with ext4. So I don't quite understand why the help of these two commands only mention
2011 Jun 26
2
iptables port forwarding
Dear all,
I would like to forward a port to an internet server, but failed. can you help me?
Server: eth0: 192.168.1.250, Port: 8080 TCP, CentOS 5.6
Remote server: IP: a.b.c.d Port: 8181
Forward path: client1(192.168.1.10) -> 192.168.1.250:8080 (forward) -> a.b.c.d Port: 8181
-----------------------------------------
In Fedora, I successfully to config the firewall using
2011 Apr 16
1
WebSite V2 - progress
Hello guys,
we have done some progress on the new web site project.
We need your comments for the design of the front page.
We have 3 proposals or the design of the frontpage.
Please look at them, we need your help :)
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/
Best regards,
Marian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type:
2011 Jun 27
2
Mail Question
Hello everyone,
Im having a issue that I just cant seem to figure out. We currently are
running an email server Centos 5.6 Postfix/Dovecot with a squirrelmail
frontend. I was setting up a testbed to do a migration to SoGo using
LDAP/MYSQL/POSTFIX/Dovecot. I have everything up and functional but one
thing is giving me an issue. The testbed box will not handle a users
mailbox over 2gb. We are using
2011 Jan 11
4
ext4 or XFS
Hi all,
I've a 30TB hardware based RAID array.
Wondering what you all thought of using ext4 over XFS.
I've been a big XFS fan for years as I'm an Irix transplant but would
like your opinions.
This 30TB drive will be an NFS exported asset for my users housing
home dirs and other frequently accessed files.
- aurf
2011 May 13
2
Modify Parameters at system boot
Hi all.
i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't
load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes
/etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576
/etc/modprobe.conf
options ip_conntrack hashsize=131072
after reboot results
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
65536
cat
2011 May 16
2
allowing users to write to a web content area
Hello,
I've got apache running on a centos 5.6 machine. All of my users have
a umask of 077 set in /etc/bashrc. I'm now wanting to give several of
them permission to write to a web area so they can place content
visible to the web server. I've got two groups webdev1 and webdev2
which I want one to be able to write to site1 and the other to site2.
I've got between 3 and 5 users in
2013 Sep 20
1
Creating 38TB ext4 FS
mkfs.ext4 fails to create 38TB file system on CentOS 6.4 64bit with this
error:
mkfs.ext4: Size of device /dev/vg02/vtapes too big to be expressed in 32
bits
using a blocksize of 4096.
More details follow:
# uname -a
Linux tzbackup 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 28 17:19:38 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# fdisk -l /dev/sdc
Disk /dev/sdc: 41996.7 GB, 41996727091200
2011 Jul 21
2
tripwire alternative
Hello all,
Years ago, I used to work with tripwire for system monitoring.
Last time I checked with "yum search tripwire", there is no hit.
IIRC, it used to be packed by default on older Redhat distros.
Any suggestion for an alternative of tripwire for my CentOS 5.6?
Cheers,
--
**********************************************************************
Viet Nhat General Joint Stock
2011 Aug 03
1
Are file system mounts costly?
I recall a kernel parameter on Unix System V of number
of mounted file systems. Max recommended was 8.
Larger numbers slowed down inode location and
impacted performance.
Has Linux solved that bottleneck? Are 20 or 30 mounted
efs and cifs file systems on one system OK?
--
M Reynolds McClatchey Jr VP Engineering and Inventory
Southern Aluminum Finishing Co Inc 404-355-1560 x222
2013 Apr 22
1
Upgrading 6.3 to 6.4 "kdump: mkdumprd: failed to make kdump initrd" should I be concerned?
Howdy,
Running a round of updates from 6.3 to 6.4 and I'm seeing the following on
all the servers.
Want to make sure I'm not going to end up with a kernel panic if I reboot
into the new kernel or have any other issues.
Apr 22 11:10:21 www kdump: kexec: unloaded kdump kernel
Apr 22 11:10:21 www kdump: stopped
Apr 22 11:10:21 www kdump: mkdumprd: failed to make kdump initrd
Apr 22
2011 May 20
3
Passing password to script for rpmsign of list of .rpm files
I am trying to automatize signing of unsigned .rpm files. My repo has at
least 50 x 3 packages.
But I would have to type numerous passwords for each file. I can not see
hot to pass pass phrase to script.
rpmsign --resign {--pass=??} <filename from list> ????
Can someone advise me how to do that?
Ljubomir
2010 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 1/3] ext3/ext4: Factor out disk addressability check
As part of adding support for OCFS2 to mount huge volumes, we need to
check that the sector_t and page cache of the system are capable of
addressing the entire volume.
An identical check already appears in ext3 and ext4. This patch moves
the addressability check into its own function in fs/libfs.c and
modifies ext3 and ext4 to invoke it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick LoPresti <lopresti at
2013 Jul 05
4
What FileSystems for large stores and very very large stores?
I was learning about the different FS exists.
I was working on systems that ReiserFS was the star but since there is
no longer support from the creator there are other consolidations to be
done.
I want to ask about couple FS options.
EXT4 which is amazing for one node but for more it's another story.
I have heard about GFS2 and GlusterFS and read the docs and official
materials from RH on
2009 Sep 02
2
EXT4 status for centos 5.3
Hi,
I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've
noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer.
Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090902/7ba417df/attachment-0001.html>