similar to: OT: Why VM?

We have a FreePBX-12 / Asterisk-12 setup that supports about 24 extensions, most internal Snom870s but six or so external (Jitsi-2.8). we use TLS and SRTP everywhere on our side of the fence. The server host is a dedicated atom(tm) box using the FreePBX distro (CentOS-6.x) and is up-to-date. Registrations require very long random passwords and registrable devices are further restricted by

Hello listmates, It appears that system-config-bind has been phased out. Whatever the reasoning was behind that decision - what are we expected to do now? Edit it manually? That is doable, of course, but kind of cumbersome. Does anybody know if there is a tool we are expected to use for that purpose? Thanks. Boris.

Respecting cloning vm guests, I see in /etc/ssh the following: ssh_host_dsa_key ssh_host_dsa_key.pub ssh_host_key ssh_host_key.pub ssh_host_rsa_key ssh_host_rsa_key.pub Is there a simple script somewhere to regenerate all the server host keys for the new guest after cloning? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at

Respecting cloning vm guests, I see in /etc/ssh the following: ssh_host_dsa_key ssh_host_dsa_key.pub ssh_host_key ssh_host_key.pub ssh_host_rsa_key ssh_host_rsa_key.pub Is there a simple script somewhere to regenerate all the server host keys for the new guest after cloning? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at

On Tue, February 7, 2017 14:29, Alnis Morics wrote: > May I ask an off-topic question? > > James, does saying "samba43" mean you installed this FreeBSD port or > package? Which is known to crash during provisioning as DC. Did you > find the solution to that issue? > Samba43 was installed on FreeBSD-10.3 as a binary package using the pkg utility. Other than ignorance I

CentOS-6.2 What is the maximum number of cpus can I configure for a single vm guest running on a host with this hardware? # lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 CPU socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID:

CentOS-6.5 (FreePBX-2.6) Asterisk-11.14.2 (FreePBX) snom870-SIP 8.7.3.25.5 I am having a very difficult time attempting to get TLS and SRTP working with Asterisk and anything else. At the moment I am trying to get TLS functioning with our Snom870 desk-sets. And I am not having much luck. Since this is an extraordinarily (to me) Byzantine environemnt I am going to ask if any of you have gotten

On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:50, Rowland penny wrote: > Port 137 should only be used by Samba nmb, so has nmbd somehow > been started ? No. The error is not caused by anything else listening on 137. [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# netstat -an | grep -i listen tcp4 0 0 192.168.18.162.22 *.* LISTEN tcp4 0 0 192.168.216.162.22 *.*

Arch = x86_64 CentOS-6.4 We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in hotswap cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP application and DBMS host. The ERP application will likely eventually have web access but at the moment only dedicated client applications can connect to it. I am researching how to best set this system up for use as a production host

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:57 AM James B. Byrne via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, August 24, 2020 11:17, James B. Byrne wrote: > > > > On the other hand, the errors I report are likely solvable should > someone with > > the ability to do so take note of them, so I am reporting this one. > What I > > want to know is whether this

I have a situation where gnome console does not handle vt102 escape sequences properly and therefor need to employ xterm instead. When I run xterm from a gnome terminal window I am presented with an extremely small terminal window employing an almost unreadably small font. I have attempted to set the font size using xrdb and a custom .Xresources file. I can change the colour scheme. I can

This morning I applied the 13 or so new updates to my servers. On one of them the ssh service and clients stopped working immediately after the update. I restarted the server in anticipation that there might be some instability introduced by updating on a system with active ssh connections. However, this has not cleared the problem. The packages in question are: openssh.i386

I am performing some configuration testing on a kvm host. When installing a guest operating system is it advisable to place each instance in a separate lv or better to accept the default and store them on the root file system? Respecting lvm, does one configure lvs in a virtual server to take space from the main vg or does one allocate lv space from inside that allocated to the virtual instance?

Where can I find a list of the options and their usage and meanings for the contents of this file? Regards, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada

On Mon, August 24, 2020 13:51 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > It isn't a PDC, that is something quite different ;-) > I know, but it is a lot shorter to write than the DC possessing the PDC FSMO role. > It is your first DC. Not really, I have been working with MS AD Domains since NT 3.51, or whatever it was called back then. This one just happens to be the one I am currently

On Fri, June 17, 2016 12:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, June 17, 2016 10:19 am, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> Keys issued to individuals certainly should have short time limits >> on them. In the same way that user accounts on systems should >> always have a near term expiry date set. People are careless. >> And their motivations are subject to change. >

[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca ALL -U administrator Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=3, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=hostmaster.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600) NS:

On Thu, March 26, 2015 22:29, Michelle Dupuis wrote: > You have to consider whether you really want "anonymous" calls, or you > just want to enable SIP calls from trusted companies/partners. The > latter means setting up routes to these companies and (ideally) > registration between peers. > This is what I am trying to get a handle on. It seemed to me that the promise

I am obviously missing something basic here but can someone explain to me what is wrong with the first statement, which returns nothing? $ history | grep ^su $ history | grep su 2997 su -l 3024 su -l 3050 su -l 3054 su -l Thanks, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited

I am attempting to get a script borrowed from DJB to work on my CentOS-6.6 box. Simplified it looks like this: tcpdump -l -n -e port 53 \ | awk '{if ($14 ~ /A.*?/) print $15}' \ | while read domain ; do echo $domain ; done ; The sticking point is the 'while read' construct. Run just as 'tcpdum | awk' I get this: english.stackexchange.com. www.urbandictionary.com.