similar to: Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

Hi, I've set up a bridge using the 2.6.11.6 kernel. The machine is running Debian testing with three NICs in it. eth0 is a standard 100Mb Intel NIC, eth1 and eth2 are both Intel gigabit cards using the e1000 driver. I tested everything at 100Mb and it worked fine. I moved the machine into production, eth1 plugging into a dumb 100Mb D-link switch, eth2 plugging into a shiney new Cisco

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5

hi list, i got a small problem. here is my setup: WAN | | | bridged $FW-------DMZ | | masqueraded | LOCAL my shorewall machine ($FW) got three interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 * eth0 is connected to the WAN * eth1 is connected to my DMZ * eth2 is connected to LOCAL network i manage a whole C class (public adresses) in my DMZ, let''s say X.Y.Z.0/24 * my router

Hi All, I''m using Shorewall 3.0.4 and I''m wondering if it is possible to do traffic shapping on only one interface from a bridge. The firewall has got 3 NIC, eth0, eth1, eth2. eth0 and eth2 are bridged, but if I''m right, when you specify a traffic rate for a link, you do it for the interface. In my case, eth0 and eth2 do not appear in the interface file, but it is

I have posted this question to the netfilter mailing list along with #ebtables, #iptables, and #netfilter. Nobody has really responded, so I''m led to believe that it is either incredibly complicated or *really* simple. Please, somebody throw me a bone here! Ok, on with the show... I have a bridge (br0) with two interfaces (eth1 and eth2). Neither br0, eth1, or eth2 have an

Hi, I've been using CentOS & Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a default bridge) to the VM's. Since I wanted to configure additional physical iface, define a new bridge and propagate it to the viface-s of the VM's, i configured the bridge/phys. iface and brought it up (here are

Hi there, I'm currently experiencing a minor problem using the bridge module under kernel 2.4.27 part of the Devil Linux distribution (http://www.devil-linux.org). The problem I am having is that when the bridge is unloaded during a reboot I receive the following errors in /var/log/messages: Nov 14 13:22:13 src@Devil kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =

Running CentOS 5.4 x64. Have successfully bridged eth2 with br2 by following the instructions here: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking (under the RHEL section) Have been running several KVM VMs successfully via this bridge. I am now trying to bridge additional interfaces by using the same routine. Each bridge is named to correspond with the ethX device its bridged with. Example of

Hy, sorry for my poor english i think i''m having a very unusual problem and very dificult to track, but i''ll try to explain it as best as i can. here is my scenario: a firewall/bridge composed of 3 ethernet devices and 1 virtual one. my bridge (br0 ) is composed of eth0, eth1 and tap0 br0:eth0 is my connection to my router (200.244.92.1) br0:eth1 is my connection to my

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Here are some notes I have about Linux bridging. I''ll try to separate what I know I know from what I think I know. Let''s say I want to bridge eth0, eth1, and eth2 together, all with an IP Address of, say, 1.2.3.2. This is how to do it: echo "Setting up br0 to bridge eth0 with eth1 and eth2" /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0

hi list I have a strange problem here. Maybe it is normal behavior and i search within the wrong direction. Probably someone here can give me a hint. I have a device (rhel4 kernel 2.6.9) with 3 interfaces. 2 interfaces (eth0, eth2) are bridged together (br0) and the bridge device has an ip address assigned (192.168.11.15). Another interface (eth1) has assigned 10.7.0.10. So far so good.

I want to configure a device with three network interfaces where two of them would bridge two segments of the LAN subnet and the third one would be connected to the WAN link. eth0 - 10.10.10.2/24 to be connected to the internet gateway having IP 10.10.10.1/24 (also the default gateway for the device) eth1 and eth2 bridged as br0 with IP address 172.16.100.1 connected to different segments of the

Here is the report and the complete diagram. And sorry for email problem and incomplete email ! I have made new test. Eth0 and eth2 are bridged. I can ping NET from LAN I can ping every firewall''s interface from LAN I can ping eth1 from private LAN I can ping everything from firewall Bridging is activated in shorewall.conf >From LAN i can ping 192.168.11.253 but not 192.168.11.254

Hello You must add first: vlan (tagged) to eth2 eth2 interface is not tagged by default and not know vlan-s . It is like a cisco if you have 24 ports in cisco by default all ports are in vlan1. if you want to do trunk (with vlans) you myst add (vlans) to this ports (tagged or untagged) So you can compare that all interfaces in linux by default are in one vlan(but not tagged). (only for

I have read several articles for setting up a network bridge. My configuration is: WorkStation --> Switch0:VLAN1 --> Switch1:VLAN1 --> bridge --> Switch1:VLAN45 --> Laptop I am running CentOS 4.3 on the bridge #> brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.0030843e5aa2 no eth1

Hi all, I''m having a hell of a time getting my IFB to work. I know I''ve done this before, so I''m missing something stupid. Can anybody tell me what it might be? Configs as follows: -------- #!/bin/sh modprobe ifb numifbs=1000 modprobe act_mirred modprobe 8021q brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 brctl stp br0 off brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl addif br0 eth2 ifconfig eth1

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:53:08 +0800 (CST) "vanyew" <vanyew@mail2000.com.tw> wrote: > Dear Stephen, > > I'm a Linux embedded developer. > We want to build the bridge function on our product. > > We use brctl to build the bridge device. > > [root@localhost /]# brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >

Hi all, Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge named br0. Searching the web I only found about creating a file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to explicitely list what ports will be bridged. Where is it configured? Thank you. -- RMA.

While using the linux bridge module in 2.6.10, the kernel seems to munge the source IP address of broadcast UDP packets if they come from "0.0.0.1", and sticks on an address of the linux host. I humbly submit that re-writing the source address of packets is not proper behavior for a bridge, even if those source addresses are not traditionally valid. Sure, 0.0.0.1 isn't a valid