similar to: Partial mock when a complex return value is required

Hello guys, Is there any way to match a render :nothing? I coudn''t find any way to do this so i''ve just changed my controllers to do a "head :ok", but it would be nice to know if there is any other way :) -- Maur?cio Linhares http://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) | http://blog.codevader.com/ (en) Jo?o Pessoa, PB, +55 83 8867-7208

I''ve found myself mocking out a published api in my set-up method. This has led to some contexts having a large set-up and empty specifications. As the mocks get auto-verified, the specification blocks have nothing to do but serve as documentation. Does this sound bad? Chris

What is the appropriate way to stub out (and put an expectation on Object#__send__), without getting warnings from the Rspec mock library? Scott

Another question. When my database is running, I do [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ cp --o_direct xdb01.dbf /tmp cp: cannot open `xdb01.dbf' for reading: Permission denied [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ When the database is shudown it works. Is this normal for ocfs because with any other filesystem I can just copy a file at any time (Its only a testing, I know I cant copy datafiles and have

Hello, I''m wondering If I am missing something here when creating an example that sets an expecation at the top or beginning of an action but requires you to stub / mock everything that follows. Example: I want to test that a certain controller is running a before_filter...thats easy: - controller.should_receive(:require_user) - do_get But now i''ve got to mock / stub

Hey all - The trunk currently supports three types of mocking/stubbing: Mock Objects (created dynamically at runtime) Partial Mocking of methods on existing classes Stubbing of methods on existing objects or classes The main difference between Partial Mocking and Stubbing is that Stubs don''t verify. I''m wondering if we really need the stubbing facility at all, given that we

There is one annoyance I''m encountering with the Mock API in rSpec. Overall it works well, as far as dynamic mocks go ;)... but there''s this one thing... It doesn''t allow overriding of expectations. example: m = mock("blah") m.should_receive(:one).any_number_of_times().and_return(1) m.should_receive(:one).and_return(1) The second call to should_receive

Hi, Quick reminder that the conference is happening today at 12:30 PM EDT. I'd like to talk more about updating to 1.4. I now have a test box running asterisk 1.4.5, CentOS 5 and Lumenvox speech rec software. Seems to be fine except for some double NAT issues that could be router specific. Byran Johns from Shelton-Johns is our guest to share some of his extensive experience. More about him

Hi again, my last example wasn''t good either. It really makes only sense in the context of using Thread. I finally came up with this code, that should now test all important aspects of running a task in a background thread (to keep it simple, I left out the exception handling). see http://pastie.caboo.se/35559 or end of mail. It seems, TaskRunner is now very well covered by the

These are patch releases recommended for anybody who has already upgraded to 2.10. ### rspec-mocks-2.10.1 full changelog: http://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/compare/v2.10.0...v2.10.1 Bug fixes * fix [regression of edge case behavior](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/132) * fixed failure of `object.should_receive(:message).at_least(0).times.and_return value` * fixed failure

Hi Code with a large number of different paths is probably the biggest problem I have right now. I''ve made a sample class that illustrates the simplest case of one parameter that takes two values: class DataStorer def initialize(logger, emailer, db_updater, do_update_db_step) @logger = logger; @emailer = emailer; @db_updater = db_updater

Dear spec''ers, As many of you already know, we''re gearing up for a pretty big 0.8 release of RSpec in the next couple of weeks. I''m writing in advance because I want to give you a heads up about upcoming changes and how they may impact your existing specs. Two important things to note first: 1. We will provide a translator that you''ll be able to use to

I was disgruntled with the amount of spam I was getting, so I started setting up accounts for the various mailing lists I listen to. I use rspec at showcase60.com to read the mail here. Along with the rspec news that comes over this channel, I''m getting more and more spam addressed to this same account, which means that the open way this list passes around email addresses is

Recently as a result of using Git I''ve noticed a number of inconsistencies in the RSpec codebase with respect to whitespace (mixed line endings, mixed use of spaces and tabs for indentation, and trailing whitespace at the end of lines). I never would have noticed, but Git produces nice colorized diff output which highlights these kinds of inconsistencies. I wanted to ask if the