Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "rssh / scponly"
2005 Jan 15
0
rssh and scponly arbitrary command execution
I just released rssh version 2.2.3 to fix the problem detailed below.
I haven't had time to update my website yet, and my Internet acess is
quite limited these days (hence the terse announcement), so I probably
won't get to that for a while. However, rssh 2.2.3 is available from
the sourceforge.net site:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rssh
All users of rssh should update to the
2004 Dec 03
1
[BUGTRAQ] rssh and scponly arbitrary command execution
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[This came over BUGTRAQ this morning. Note the call for volunteers
vis-a-vis rssh.]
- ----- Forwarded message from Jason Wies <jason at xc.net> -----
List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe at securityfocus.com>
To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com
Cc: rssh-discuss at
2012 Feb 07
3
Suggestion for openssh
Hi!
I do not know if it's the ideal place, but I'm sending some suggestion.
Always use openssh and its enormous features.
- I needed to create an environment with only sftp access and thus used:
- Match User suporte
ForceCommand / usr / lib / openssh / sftp-server
OK! It worked perfectly! But only sftp.
- Create an environment with only blocking the ssh, but scp and
2004 Oct 23
1
rssh: pizzacode security alert
PIZZACODE SECURITY ALERT
program: rssh
risk: low[*]
problem: string format vulnerability in log.c
details:
rssh is a restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp
and/or sftp. For example, if you have a server which you only want to
allow users to copy files off of via scp, without providing shell
access, you can use rssh to do that. Additioanlly, running rsync,
rdist, and cvs are
2008 Mar 08
1
rsync 3.0 and rssh
Since rsync 3.0 i've detected a problem with rssh and -e option....rssh
doesn't allow this option...but is essential to me (cyphered transmission
with ssh).
Surfing the net i've seen a guy that made a patch but I don't know how
reliable is...and rssh former programer says he just left the project so
it's no longer his problem.
Is this stuff going to be updated in rsync or is
2004 Jun 19
0
security flaw in rssh
rssh is a small shell whose purpose is to restrict users to using scp
or sftp, and also provides the facilities to place users in a chroot
jail. It can also be used to lock users out of a system completely.
William F. McCaw identified a minor security flaw in rssh when used
with chroot jails.
There is a bug in rssh 2.0 - 2.1.x which allows a user to gather
information outside of a chrooted jail
2008 Jun 07
2
Chroot'ed SSH
Hi,
Is anyone chrooting users that connect through SSH?
I looked for it on Google and I basically saw several methods:
- OpenSSH 5 supports ChrootDirectory (FC9 apparently has RPMs that
probably could be rebuilt under CentOS 5)
- There seem to be several patches for OpenSSH 4.x to do the chroot,
the most popular seems to be http://chrootssh.sf.net/
- There appears to be a pam_chroot
- There are
2005 Dec 30
5
rssh: root privilege escalation flaw
Affected Software: rssh - all versions prior to 2.3.0
Vulnerability: local user privilege escalation
Severity: *CRITICAL*
Impact: local users can gain root access
Solution: Please upgrade to v2.3.1
Summary
-------
rssh is a restricted shell which allows a system administrator to
limit users' access to a system via SSH to scp, sftp, rsync, rdist,
and cvs. It also allows the system
2002 Aug 21
1
vulnerabilities in scponly
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: msg.pgp
Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20020820/23eb5774/attachment.ksh
2007 Sep 05
3
Chrooting SFTP over SSH2
Hi,
As per the subject line - if I look up setting up chroot jails for SFTP over
SSH2 I'm led to various Web sites and patches and also to a CentOS wiki page
dated 2005, but what's the 'best' or 'correct' way to set this up for Centos
4.5 and 5?
Thanks
2011 Mar 09
1
Bug#617527: logcheck-database: incomplete rules for scponly-full
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.3.13
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
scponly-full (using 4.8-4.1) in Debian is compiled with additional support for rsync, unison and SVN.
However, the logcheck rule is based on the original version and doesn't include those commands in
the regexp.
Please add those three commands to the regexp.
Best regards,
Markus
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
2008 Dec 09
2
Feature request: AlwaysDenyLogin, LoginDelayTime
Please consider adding the following features to sshd:
1. AlwaysDenyLogin - a setting that will result in always denying
login regardless of the credentials given by the client.
2. LoginDelayTime - to specify a delay in milliseconds before the
server responds to a client's login attempt.
These would help to employ brute force bots.
Regards
2003 Dec 31
2
chroot + ssh concerns
Hello,
I'm new to the list, but hopefully I've done enough digging around that
I don't get yelled at too terribly ;)
We're looking to implement a chrooted environment for allowing users to
scp files from servers. That's basically the only functionality that
we need in this case. We're looking to chroot the user and/or remove
any chance that the account can login via
2006 Jun 24
1
[PATCH] sftp-server Restricted Access
Hello,
This patch makes it possible to restrict sftp sessions to a certain
subtree of the file system on a per-Unix account basis. It requires a
program such as rssh or scponly to function. A patch for rssh is also
attached to this email.
The method employed uses realpath() and a string comparison to check
that each file or directory access is allowed.
With this patch, sftp-server takes a
2010 Apr 13
3
[Bug 1755] New: Broken pipe with scponly with debuglevel
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1755
Summary: Broken pipe with scponly with debuglevel
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.4p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sftp-server
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2003 Jul 07
0
[semi-OT] rssh FINAL RELEASE! Well, hopefully.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm pleased to announce that rssh now has per-user configurations!
Today I released rssh v2.1.0 with that last peice of functionality to
be added, bringing active development of rssh to a close.
Additionally, I spent several hours testing and debugging this release
as thoroughly as I could think to, and I'm pleased to report (tongue
in cheek)
2003 Jul 02
0
[semi-OT] rssh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I released rssh v2.0.4 today. It fixes bugs in the parser which
affect quoted arguments in the config file, as well as the code which
builds the vector for the arguments to the exec call. In the latter
case, arguments which contain a space were treated as two sepearate
args. The man page was also updated to include information about
quoting values
2003 Jan 02
0
rssh 1.0.4 released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Today I released rssh 1.0.4. rssh is a small replacement shell that
provides the ability for system administrators to give specific users
access to a given system via scp or sftp only.
For downloads or more information, visit the rssh homepage:
http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh
This release fixes a stupid bug caused by a failure to
2005 Mar 24
1
"ssh user@server /bin/sh" vs "no-pty" option.
Hello List,
Do I get it right that I *MUST* chroot a user first and make
/bin/rssh his shell in the /etc/passwd to effectively restrict him?
There should be no /bin/ksh (or bash) in his jail?
If I do not jail him - no matter what is his passwd shell - he will
be able to issue "ssh user at server /bin/sh" still, right?
--
Best regards,
Anthony mailto:rz1a at
2003 Aug 16
0
sftp-server (secure) chroot patch?
Hello,
I know this chroot issue has been brought up many times before on this list. I saw that the contribibuted chroot-patch was removed from the contrib directory because it always was out of date. The main reason was of course was that sftp-server has to be run as root to be able to do the chroot() call? Most of you are against chroot (since it isnt in the src) but I believe a lot of users