similar to: PHP - Security Updates

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-1692 The NIST advisory says that all versions of OpenSSH potentially contain the flaw. ?But is that really true? ?For example, I looked at the 3.8.1p1 distribution and didn't find any reference to JPAKE at all. Thanks.

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X012 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 2eb1022ec7ec2d508248c9c152e253aa72acfa08a155701d2791b1458766590a e1000e-2.5.4-3.4.68.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X011 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 0ca23e081ddc488aa22b357fd2ad46b26526424f4613f5af7254bcbdcbcf1474 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.55.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X009 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- b46a8cc4391424f463aec8e81e716152357426ae3601857b2661bc5a1257f9b3 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.43.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X018 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 2ac8f3b6799eac04c6fc5fe054a68d00bdf914f173087a7802c9bce8b4366e48 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.25.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Thanks for the analysis of second bug. Please also share CVSSv3 score for first bug. Arjit Kumar On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:36 +0530, Arjit Gupta via samba wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Please let me know the severity of CVE-2017-2619 and CVE-2017-7494. > > They are not unpublished:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0620-01 Important (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: a8a913de2ce129fe28c1015d2be0ca72acbb70eb7b4e41ef470f8fdc3d70c6ad kernel-3.4.50-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm b01179ca3023f3f3503fe71f8efbdecee9f01f6be552c2a35c91909fe652574f

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil > sites with New DoDCAC > > I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved > DADEMS recently? DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would

In the bang head and repeat mode here. The live usb partition is /dev/sda1 Reboot / power on It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2 $ umount /mnt/disc/sda2 $ mkdir /root/foo $ mke2fs /dev/sda2 $ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo Kernel panic Snip from the kernel panic: ?????? list_del+0xb/0x71 cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186 ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37 .... system_call+0x7e/0x83 --

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X002 Important (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- kernel-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm: a9dcd1ef0417ed31aad7642b1f5a028e8ad69a11382640b4442059ba1d9ccc23

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X005 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 4d780927c1273021f707954531d4f8363f96001a09101ac3b828c02dcf640fc5 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.29.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

Hi All, Actually I am working with the OpenSSH version 6.2p which is vulnerable to above mentioned vulnerabilities. So am looking for some help how I can fix these vulnerabilities in my version. I need to fix it in the OpenSSH code. Regards Abhishek

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >

Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore,

On centos 4 (i386 chroot on an x86_64) it just prompts me for a password. Any suggesstion on where to start looking? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443)

Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost also reports 16.0.0.0. Google is not being my friend right now, any advice? Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp In the chroot: httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4