similar to: IPC Benchmark in Centos

Hi List, I''ve took some time and made some tests on the performance of java-lucene, hyperestraier and ferret as Dave encourages the community of ferret to do so. Quite intersting numbers. Ferret indeed deserves to be called a high-performance port!! It''s MyFirstBenchmark ( http://ferret.davebalmain.com/trac/wiki/MyFirstBenchmark ) so please don''t be too cruel on

On 06/07/2017 02:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/7/2017 11:28 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> In the case of CentOS-7 .. you don't need to create a whole new >>> distro, you can just petition the CentOS Project Board to create a >>> Special Interest Group to get access to CentOS Project controlled >>> resources to build packages (and get them rolled

Dear all I was thinking about efficient reading data into R and tried several ways to test if load(file.Rdata) or readRDS(file.rds) is faster. The files file.Rdata and file.rds contain the same data, the first created with save(d, ' file.Rdata', compress=F) and the second with saveRDS(d, ' file.rds', compress=F). First I used the function microbenchmark() and was a astonished

Hi All, I am facing miscompare error when running povray (and few other C/C++ benchmarks) from spec cpu2006 suite enabling FMA4 (and disabling FMA3). I have used -ffp-contract=fast to turn on this option. (Compilation options and targets pasted below). >>>>>>>> clang version 3.2 (trunk 163295:163308) (llvm/trunk 163295) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix

Without the glusterd log file and the core file or the backtrace I can't comment anything. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:09 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggestion.... > > On Dec 6, 2017 11:51, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> We are getting the crash in glusterd after

The large value for maximum time may be due to garbage collection, which happens periodically. E.g., try the following, where the unlist(as.list()) creates a lot of garbage. I get a very large time every 102 or 51 iterations and a moderately large time more often mb <- microbenchmark::microbenchmark({ x <- as.list(sin(1:5e5)); x <- unlist(x) / cos(1:5e5) ; sum(x) }, times=1000)

I'm having a couple of problems getting samba to process /etc/printcap properly. The printer definition lines of my /etc/printcap are: epson|lp|uniprint-letter-auto-mono|Epson Stylus Color 800 (mono, 360x360):\ color|epson_color|lp1|uniprint-letter-auto-mono|Epson Stylus Color 800 (color, 360x360):\ med|epson_med|lp2|uniprint_stc800p-letter-auto-mono|Epson Stylus Color 800 (mono, 720x720):\

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, James Molloy via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > You don't appear to have addressed my suggestion to not require a perfect > > external world, instead to measure the overhead of an imperfect world (by > >

Note that if you force a garbage collection each iteration the times are more stable. However, on the average it is faster to let the garbage collector decide when to leap into action. mb_gc <- microbenchmark::microbenchmark(gc(), { x <- as.list(sin(1:5e5)); x <- unlist(x) / cos(1:5e5) ; sum(x) }, times=1000, control=list(order="inorder")) with(mb_gc,

FYI, Yesterday's Slashdot had an article about Linux compiler benchmarks from Coyote Gulch (Scott Ladd). In this update he compares GCC and ICC. You can read the article here: http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers/ Of particular note was his use of SciMark 2.0 which is a NIST developed benchmark for scientific computing. Its available in both java and C and computes a MFLOPS

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, James Molloy via

I just upgraded to Debian 2.2 and Samba 2.0.7-3, but Samba isn't working. When I try and connect to a share from my windows box, I get a message "The specified computer did not receive your request. Please try again later." when I try to connect as I boot and "Permanent connection not available" if I try and connect later. Here are the messages from my log file. Does

Hi Atin, Please find the backtrace and logs files attached here. Also, below are the BT from core. (gdb) bt #0 0x00003fff8834b898 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:55 #1 0x00003fff88350fd0 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 [**ALERT: The abort() might not be exactly invoked from the following function line. If the trail function

I have a problem with samba 2.05a on my irix-6.5 box. Now I know this must be a user problem because I have run samba on this machine before. Samba compiles and runs fine and I have tried the precompiled version too. I have /tmp shared out as [tmp] and get the following messages in log.smb when I try to connect to it using smbclient from the localhost smbd version 2.0.5a started. Copyright

I hope these logs were sufficient... please let me know if you require more logs. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Atin, > > Please find the backtrace and logs files attached here. > > Also, below are the BT from core. > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x00003fff8834b898 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at >

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > It is a valid benchmark though :-) compile speed is a actually a > good measure for any integer app that is small enough to run in > large cache... Image processing, oil companies for their simulations, > cad... they all act very similar to compile benchmark - if a compile > is twice as fast, a software image rendering is usually

Newbie here (to R) and running Linux... > install.packages("gsl","~/R") ... trying URL 'http://cran.wustl.edu/src/contrib/gsl_1.8-4.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-tar' length 57051 bytes opened URL ================================================== downloaded 55Kb * Installing *source* package 'gsl' ... checking for gcc... gcc checking for C

Hello, I have the following entries in /boot/loader.conf: kern.ipc.shm_use_phys="1" kern.ipc.semmns="500" kern.ipc.semmni="40" kern.ipc.semmap="500" which are set correctly. Unfortunately, the following two entries kern.ipc.shmmax="512000000" kern.ipc.shmall="65526" do not change the corresponding values according to

http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits Is this anthing people are working on? Is it on its way to RELENG_7? Is there a 7-version of the patch or anything? This would be a _VERY_ useful feature. -- Peter Ankerst?l peter@pean.org

Either I''ve been up too late, or the timeout value passed to Ipc.new isn''t actually saved anywhere. Am I wrong? Anyway, I''ve added docs and a test suite for win32-ipc. Feel free to take a look and make sure there aren''t any glaring errors. Thanks. Dan PS - I''m hoping to release win32-event 0.2.0 and win32-ipc 0.1.0 this weekend unless there are