similar to: Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one to

Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB???? 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the

On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? > It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: > > -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock > --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue > rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm

Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but

Am I correct in thinking that it''s not currently possible to have a method that creates a ''standard'' mock (i.e. a mock that has defaults useful in all contexts)? I''ve tried with the mock method and also by manually creating new Mock instances. I get failures when setting up expectations (undefined method ''receive'' for proc). Chris

Here''s another one. spec: m = mock("blah") m.should_receive(:foo).with(1) code: m.foo(2) Failure message: Mock ''blah'' expected ''foo'' once, but received it 0 times ------ Twice now I''ve gotten this failure message and wasted time trying to understand why the method foo() was not being called despite all evidence suggesting

Hi, I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. I have the following in the mock config template: [local-repo] name=my-Local baseurl=http://yumrepo.example.com/yum-repository/local/centos/8/x86_64/ failovermethod=priority skip_if_unavailable=False When I try to run mock I get the following error: (vgeppetto3 pts18) $ mock -v -r epel-8-x86_64

Morning, somehow the upgrade to 4.4 broke mock on my system: | [angenenr at shutdown SPECS]$mock -r c3-i386 /home/angenenr/redhat/SRPMS/apache-ssl-2.8.28-2el4.src.rpm | init | clean | prep | This may take a while | Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed? Nope, it's not the config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall build' issue, as I'm still

Hi Jonathan, On Sun, 23 Aug 2020, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:07, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> ?Hi, >> >> I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. >> I have the following in the mock config template: >> >> [local-repo] >> name=my-Local >>

This might be an embarrassingly simple question. How are people building multi-arch library packages on CentOS 7? On older releases one could "mock -r epel-6-i386" and "mock -r epel-6-x86_64" to build a library twice. With no 32-bit release, there's no epel-7-i386 target for mock. Specifying --target=i386 or --arch-i386 both fail. Do we have to set up the

On 25/08/20 11:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock. >> In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following: >> config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the >> rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not

Hi, Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical" build environment to create those srpms in the first place. Am I right or did I get something terribly wrong? Cheers! -- Nux! www.nux.ro

I've successfully rebuilt Red Hat EL PHP 5.2.10 RPMs using mock on a CentOS 5.4 i386. I wanted to be able to build both x86_64 and i386 versions so I reinstalled my builder system with CentOS 5.4 x86_64. Now I can build the PHP RPM successful for x86_64, but i386 fails with the following during configure /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64: command not found For the

Just curious - now that rspec (as of 0.9) let''s you choose your mock framework, how many of you are actually using (or planning to use) mocha or flexmock? Anybody planning to use any other mock framework besides rspec, mocha or flexmock? Thanks, David

Hello list, I'm currently trying to build the i686 version of http://vault.centos.org/7.5.1804/os/Source/SPackages/nss-util-3.34.0-2.el7.src.rpm The x86_86 version works with mock, but I cannot figure out how to build the i686 version. best regards, Martin

I have a mock object (Person) that is associated with another object (my_object) through a belongs_to association. When I check whether my_object is valid (my_object.should be_valid), I am getting an error like the following: Mock "Person_6338" received unexpected message :marked_for_destruction? with (no args) Checking the list of methods on the mock,

I was reading through the FlexMock docs and noticed the expectation method .mock, which returns the original mock associated with an expectation. It looks really handy for writing nice all-in-one mocks like: mock_user = mock(''User'').expects(:first_name).returns(''Jonah'').mock So I started playing around with mocha and found I could actually already do this!

I have a model class, say, model.rb, and in the normal course of things it creates an instance of another class, say utility.rb (also in the models directory). class Utility def initialize(obj) # do stuff... end def do_something_expensive # lots of stuff here end end During testing, I want to mock out do_something_expensive because it''s not important for the tests,

There is one annoyance I''m encountering with the Mock API in rSpec. Overall it works well, as far as dynamic mocks go ;)... but there''s this one thing... It doesn''t allow overriding of expectations. example: m = mock("blah") m.should_receive(:one).any_number_of_times().and_return(1) m.should_receive(:one).and_return(1) The second call to should_receive

I''m having a problem using mock objects in development (not testing). I have a class called User. In order to log in, User has to connect to an external IMAP server and authenticate. I don''t want to do this during development. So, I created a mock User in tests/mock/development that went something like this: require ''models/user'' class User def