similar to: Package updates for 5.4?

I'm having trouble setting up ldap based authenication. I have a virtual (KVM) CentOS 5.4 box set up to authenticate to a 389 (fedora) directory server, and that works fine. However, I set up a virtual box running CentOS 6, and I can't get it to authenicate. I've run authconfig with the appropriate flags, ldapsearch properly finds the data, but I can't log in. /var/log/secure

I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard

I'm running fedora directory server on some boxes in a multi-master arrangement. The problem is that when dirsrv is lauched from init (on boot) the maximum number of allowed file descriptors (ulimit -n) is only 4096. That means that the slapd process can only accept ~4k connections, and it needs to accept ~10k or so. The value for nofile for all users in /etc/security/limits.conf (and

I'm trying to find out if a particular RedHat patch has been ported to CentOS yet. In particular, this vulnerability: CVE-2011-3607 According to this: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0323.html it has been patched as of httpd-2.2.3-63.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm Now, in the latest CentOS repository, I find httpd-2.2.3-63.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm Is this the same (or later) release? I suspect

Converting this customer from a MiTel system to asterisk. Discovered that the inbound calls from the T1 are going to extension 366. (This was mapped in the MiTel for some arcane purpose.) The dial plan I am currently using is shown below. When loading the dial plan, I get this warning: WARNING[5004]: pbx_config.c:1561 pbx_load_config: The use of '_.' for an extension is strongly

Hello, I have install Horde rpm with webmin: Instalando paquete(s) con el comando yum -y install yun grouinstall horde ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de * updates: ftp.belnet.be Setting up Install Process No package yun available. No package grouinstall

Hi, Here are some top reminders for the 3.12 release: 1) When 3.12 is released 3.8 will be EOL'd, hence users are encouraged to prepare for the same as per the calendar posted here. 2) 3.12 is a long term maintenance (LTM) release, and potentially the last in the 3.x line of Gluster! 3) From this release onward, the feature freeze date is moved ~45 days in advance, before the release.

I just stumbled over /var/log/CodeMeter, which contains a number of large log files. I know I'm getting old and forgetful, but I can't remember intentionally installing that package. Yum just says "installed" instead of listing a repo. Looking at codemeter.com, it seems to work with something called a "cm stick". I don't have one, don't want one, and never

Hi guys, I've been running 0.5.0, which is dated sometime in September of this year and I've noticed a couple of new features in more recent code that I'd like to use, but am hesitant to go w/ CVS code. My system is not exactly a production system, it's mostly test, but I'm still leery of the fresh code. I'm wondering when the next stable release might come out, and

Hello, Since outgoinglimit is EOL'd, I've implemented SetGroup/GetGroupCount to ensure that SIP clients will only have a single call at any time. Works perfectly for simple calls using Dial(). I'm now struggling to find a way to similarily limit 2nd calls to SIP clients that are Agents, who receive their calls from a Queue(). Is there any way to accomplish this (without writing

Yeah, about that... Back in '12, we got a nice HP poster printer. They don't support Linux, but a co-worker got the .ppd out of the Mac support file. I tried it, then I looked at the file in vi... and found it *only* supported the 24" printer, *not* the 44" printer that we had. Well, we just bought a replacement, since the old printer was EOL'd. This time, I went to hplips,

On 19 April 2018 at 05:04, Always Learning <centos at u68.u22.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 09:40 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > >> > On Wed, April 18, 2018 8:36 pm, Always Learning wrote: > >> >> I have an aversion to using anything that comes from unknown sources, as >> >> used by Torrent. > >> Can we also challenge this

Interesting notes on the 79xx series. The 7920 is the wireless phone; not mentioned here. For a more complete guide to Cisco's phones, see: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_data_sheets_list.html The 7902 is the "very inexpensive" Cisco phone, and it looks like it will be SCCP (Skinny) only. Twiddling my thumbs here waiting for the chan_sccp to

Another day, another apparant unexplained hardware incompatibility. I have a TE412P and a TDM400B living quite happily in a whitebox using an Intel motherboard: http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/se7230nh1-e/index.htm I tried to move to an IBM x3650 system. It uses a slightly newer chipset, but apparantly it's in the same family. The SE-7230 board has been EOL'd and the

On 01/06/17 22:47, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some top reminders for the 3.12 release: > > 1) When 3.12 is released 3.8 will be EOL'd, hence users are encouraged > to prepare for the same as per the calendar posted here. > > 2) 3.12 is a long term maintenance (LTM) release, and potentially the > last in the 3.x line of Gluster! > > 3) From this release

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Andy Graybeal wrote: >> The Polycom 321 has not been EOL'd and supports VLAN. It is, however, >> lacking a 2nd ethernet port if you were to go that route. >> >> -M >> > Thanks for the response Mark. I see the 331 has two ports and the same > features as the 321. > > I'm wondering what phone would be best being used as an

i've just started looking after a (virtual) centos 5.4 server that's hosted at rackspace and, unsurprisingly, it was set up with all the standard defaults. part of the work i'll be doing involves php and, as i read it, the standard php version with centos 5.4 is php-5.1. if i *wanted* to move up to a more recent version (say, php-5.3), obviously, i'd need to go outside the

Jim Perrin mentioned a job opening on the CentOS list yesterday. I'd like to do the same, but I'm leery of contributing to topic drift. Is there any interest in creating a job-board section of some kind on the wiki? Anyone have experience with unusual problems that such a section might cause?

Hello all...new to dovecot and this list. I have a question that may have been answered before, but I can't find anything yet that addresses it directly. I installed dovecot 2.0.8 (+postfix, fetchmail) on a small server to manage several e-mail accounts. I love this software! So, to back to the question: I'd like to archive e-mail as it ages into a single IMAP archive directory.

I went to download 4.9 stable today, but was leery when I noticed that the files for 4.9 are all dated in October 2002 (on ftp.freebsd.org). While I suspect that this is just a clock issue on the server, I wanted to make certain that there was not a potential security concern. Can anyone confirm that this server just has an incorrect clock? Thanks, Eric