similar to: Centos, Samba , WIN7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, I think this is not the only time you guys ever seen that kind of mails. First of all, I did checked all that is to be checked before writing to list. wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g work flawless. Also wbinfo -a, so I can authenticate without problems. The setup is a normal trust setup where domain X (my domain) trusts domain Y (another company).

Hello to all, is the first time I write to this mailing list, I wanted to ask you a hand about an upgrade of samba I did on a centos 5.5 i386 with kernel 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5, which I updated with yum samba3x-3.3. 8-0.52.el5_5.2 bringing it to samba3x-3.6.6-0.129.el5. Now I can not put the computer to the domain, the error is that I find myself Jan 24 17:53:03 VmPDC smbd[15115]: [2013/01/24

I see via yum that there is "samba" and there is "samba3x" available for CentOS (my boxes are hooked to the main CentOS repo, Fedora EPEL, and RPMFORGE). 'samba' is 3.0.33 'samba3x' is 3.3.8 Is there any down-side to upgrading to 'samba3x' and running 3.3.8 instead of 3.0.33? I'm assuming that, in general, I should be running the latest

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi all, Please help Ive been wasting days at this... I am not trying to create a PDC, I am not joining an active directory, I am not needing samba schema in my openldap (or do I?), I am not trying to use winbind and idmaps for translations from SID to UID/GID, I just want my samba server which shares linux home directories to authenticate user+password against my existing linux based openldap

In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages, mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The Samba server services Linux, WinXP, and Win7 clients. Now I get many, many errors logged to the Samba logs shortly after 3:00 AM, but only from the Win7 clients. I get roughly 430

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0698 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0698.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: faa58b13a65533c118e9ac87e8fa4d31 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.i386.rpm b80ab40b83e91b8574042b910fbfed69 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0698 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0698.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 6503b6b291bd78f5f7b46e4c9cf990c5 libtalloc-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.i386.rpm 4731ba6805281b11252a74423bafb8e2 libtalloc-devel-1.2.0-52.el5_5.2.i386.rpm

Hello, I've inherited a set of servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.9. They have some variant of samba 3.3 on them (e.g. Version 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2). These servers are using Samba and Winbind as a way to bind to our Active Directory environment as domain members. We also have a domain member file server running the following: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6

Dear all May be this question asked earlier in list but i didn't able to search exact . I have samba+ldap domain setup on RHEL 5.1 and samba version is 3.0.28. Today i got a windows 7 system , but i am not able to join that system in our samba+ldap domain. Do i need to do any registry tweaking. I can't upgrade own samba version beyond 3.0.33 because this maximum version i get if i update

Good morning all, I really hate emailing lists, but I've come to a wall that I just cant work out how to get past at the moment, so am hoping for some community assistance if possible. Some background: We are running Windows Server 2003 on all of our domain controllers, and are in the middle of migrating to server 2008 R2. We have unix exentions enabled (rfc2307 I believe), and manage

Hi, I'm abaut to install asterisk and I want to know if buying an E400P (Quad Span E-1 Interface) from digium my linux box will be ready (of course, after configure it) to work with PSTN and my already in use PBX (E1 interface), or I'll need to buy additional DSP's cards or whatever? thanks Eduardo Gon?alves AceNet do Brasil LTDA 55 11 3365-0500

Hi all, I get troubles with samba3x server: samba3x-winbind-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-common-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 Some times, users call and ask of any folder in any share sleep. Locked not _all_ share, only one of it's folder. In logs i don't see any errors(for time of user call, may be errors in log was some times before). I use

Good morning! I'm reviewing some corporate storage setups involving NetApps, where the NetApp stores what they call "UNIX Qtrees". So far, so good: those allow the setting of access to the data with NFS4 ACL's, which are fairly sophisticated and allow multiple groups or even multiple users to be granted write access.or read access, besides the normal UNIX group owner. That works

Good afternoon/morning/evening everyone, I've been running into the problem of clients using Windows 7 with CentOS 5.X and file/printer sharing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stand samba-3.0.33-x.x.x packages DO NOT provide compatibility with Windows Vista/7. I've had to manually compile samba from source or use the samba3x packages to fix the problem. Just wondering if we're

My customer has a Centos Linux 5.10 server running Samba 3. (Samba version 3.0.33-3.40.el5_10) The machine is about three years old. I suggested that they should consider replacing it with a Centos 6 machine and Samba 4, but they decided as it was doing its job without any issues to keep it as is. I also suggested updating to samba3x but they decided not to do this. I recently installed a centos

I've been running samba on RHEL5 for the past couple of years with XP clients. Late last year, in order to support new Win7 clients, I upgraded from samba-3.0.33 packages to samba3x-3.3.8 (from the Red Hat-managed configuration tree) and after some struggles got everything working. But now after upgrading to samba3x-3.5.4 I am only able to connect as a known user and not as a guest. Relevant

Hello Ia have samba PDC 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 on centos 5.5. My clients - win XP PRO SP3. I have noticed that some users copy from sama share whole catalog with program and run it from local drive where they got full access. Write access for This share [geo$] is only for @geo group! Others can't write . So they are workaround this ! How can I prevent copying programs from samba shares to a

Hi, I upgraded a working centos5.5 with squid using ntlm auth to centos 5.6 today. After doing so squid failed to authenticate. Downgrading samba3x to samba3x-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 got things working again. In the squid config I have, auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp in the squid config and this was working until the upgrade. testparm shows no errors

Hi, I'm currently running Samba3x-3.3.8-0.51 on CentOS 5.5. I currently have many Windows XP clients associated with the domain and behaving correctly. However, I am unable to join a Windows 7 PC. I receive "The specified network name is no longer available." I've verified that DNS is configured correctly, and as stated XP machines have no problem joining. Per some googling,