similar to: variable raid1 rebuild speed?

I have configured 2x 500G sata HDD as Software RAID1 with three partitions md0,md1 and md2 with md2 as 400+ gigs Now it is almost 36 hours the status is cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 hdb1[1] hda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md1 : active raid1 hdb2[1] hda2[0] 4096448 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md2 : active raid1

Is my new 300GB RAID 1 array REALLY going to take 18936 minutes to sync!!???

Dear all, I'm not used to handling software raid. I've inherited a server which has raid 10 set. one of our disks failed, and it's to be replaced today. My question is; any hint how to add this new disk to the existing raid array ? first thought is :- Create identical partitions as other disks in the array i'd like to add it to.- add it to raid. Though i'm extremely worried of

Hi, Has anyone had any experience with Intel Vroc[1]? I'm possibly having to deal with a new server with such technology and can't find much (real world) information about it. Looking at the specs it's basically a glorified fake raid which usually turns on my alarm bells. Has anyone done any testing, how does it compare with "real" raid or software raid? Cheers, Lucian [1]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 07:01:00AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > 3. Here's a neat little trick you can use to speed up the initial sync. > > $ sudo echo 50000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min > > I've written a detailed blog article about the kind of setup you want. > It's in French, but the Linux bits are universal. > >

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Michael Smith wrote: > >What do I have to request to get the .xsl page of stats? Can't remember > >the page name so I don't know if it's working or not. > > You can use any xsl file in the web directory. Just use > http://server:port/your_page.xsl ummmm... Ok. And if I get a 404 error? Is this indicative of something in particular? the

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Michael H <michael at wemoto.com> wrote: > Selinux has been around for a while. > Yes, I know this but ... > > setsebool - set selinux boolean > What I am asking is if the command above is part of SELinux since I doesn't use before because it's a VM running on my PC so I not need such security levels. > > You should

Hi, My requirement is something like as given below, a.c => a.obj contains a1() and a2() function b.c => b.obj contains b1() and b2() function main.c => main.obj call to a1, a2, b1, b2 Now, I want to move a1(), a2() from a.obj to b2.obj and on top of function b1() When I call b1() from main, it should call first a1, a2 and then function definition of b1 Can you please give me some

Hi! Shorewall Users May I know ..what does it means ? Nov 5 12:43:34 netgw kernel: Shorewall:newnotsyn:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:05:5d:4e:fc:62:00:d0:95:7a:d5:f1:08:00 SRC=210.59.230.239 DST=211.24.146.50 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=36787 PROTO=TCP SPT=80 DPT=20291 WINDOW=65160 RES=0x00 ACK FIN URGP=0 Best Regards, Support

I suppose, CentOS 7 ships with DVD and minimal version. While the minimal version is just 700M, what makes the minimal along with a GUI about 4.3 GB. Isint it too huge for an OS ? -- Cheers -- S.Ramaseshan Engineer fractalio.com ramaseshan at fractalio.com

Hello list. The next days we are going to install Centos 7 on a new server, with 4*3Tb sata hdd as raid-5. We will use the graphical interface to install and set up raid. Do I have to consider anything before installation, because the disks are very large? Does the graphical use the parted to set/format the raid? I hope the above make sense. Thank you in advance. Nikos

Hi: Have been testing the latest winamp plugins on my icecast2 stream (http://bumpy.braille.uwo.ca:9000/test.ogg <plug plug>) and I noticed that in the field where the player/browser is listed in the log entries I see Mozilla for the winamp plugin. Isn't this ummmm. wrong? Geoff. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

Hello, After some fiddling with the server now I have broken RAID1 with the "current" mirror on the disk with few unreadable sectors. If I try to re-add other disk to the mirror resync goes till those bad sectors and then starts from the beginning. And so on. Is it possible to somehow force resync to continue even after errors? Manual resync with dd would require a bit too long

Full_Name: Murray H Smith Version: 0.63.3 OS: Windows NT Submission from: (NULL) (130.216.5.57) The ppois function is displaced by -0.5. Try: > ppois(-0.5,1) [1] 0.3678794 > ppois(-0.51,1) [1] 0 > ppois(0,1) [1] 0.3678794 and > par(mfrow=c(2,1)) > x<-seq(-1,5,0.01) > plot(x,ppois(x,1),type="s",ylab="F(x)",main="Poisson CDF?") >

Le 27/06/2019 ? 15:36, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit a ?crit?: > Do I have to consider anything before installation, because the disks > are very large? I'm doing this kind of installation quite regularly. Here's my two cents. 1. Use RAID6 instead of RAID5. You'll lose a little space, but you'll gain quite some redundancy. 2. The initial sync will be very (!) long, something like a

I would like to write AGI script in Ruby Would anybody please show me right direction.. Thanks

Is anyone using RAID6 in production? In moving from hardware RAID on my dual 3ware 7500-8 based systems to md, I decided I'd like to go with RAID6 (since md is less tolerant of marginal drives than is 3ware). I did some benchmarking and was getting decent speeds with a 128KiB chunksize. So the next step was failure testing. First, I fired off memtest.sh as found at

I have found a: HPE 873830-S01 ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 for <$300 without drives.? If I can believe the seller, it has a AMD Opteron X3216 Dual-core (2 Core) 1.6GHz and 8GB Installed. It has 4 3.5" bays. and 1? "Media" bay? https://www.servertechsupply.com/873830-s01/ this could well be acceptable.? Got to find out power draw.? Looks like ~40W. Any input on issues of OS

Hallo Simon, > Anyway, the splitting of large disks has additional advantages. Think of > what happens in case of a failure (power loss, kernel crash...). With the > disk as one large chunk, the whole disk has to be resynced on restart > while with smaller segments only those which are marked as dirty have to > be resynced. This can make a bit difference. I am not sure if this is

At 07:11 AM 8/17/2020, you wrote: >On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now?? Last time I tried > > that my system refused to boot.? I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 > > kernel to get my machine to reboot. > > > > Since that happened I've been watching this mail list