similar to: Bonding performance question

Hi! I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the corresponding configuration for the master is ( /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): TYPE=Bond BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME=bond0 DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=10.3.20.131 PREFIX=24

would like some input on this one please. Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other. Both servers have the following setup: CentOS 5.5 x64 XEN 1GB NIC's 7200rpm SATA HDD's The hardware configuration can't change, I need to use these servers as they are. They are both used in production

I'm looking at tuning up a new site and the bonding issue came up A google search reveals that the gluster docs (and Lindsay) recommend balance-alb bonding. However, "team"ing came up which I wasn't familiar with. Its already in RH6/7 and Ubuntu and their Github page implies its stable. The libteam.org people seem to feel their solution is more lightweight and it seems easy

Promox 4.2 running on 2 nodes + 1 quorum = total 3 servers. All of them have tinc 1.0.24 running. On very rare occasions (every few days or 1~2 weeks), my website hosted on this proxmox node will throw cloudflare 522 connection timed out for few seconds or few minutes: https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200171906-Error-522-Connection-timed-out This problem has been driving me

Hi all, Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup? Of course we are also bridging here. - aurf

Hello list, I have two differents installation Xen Hypervisor on two identical physical server, on the same switch : The problem is on my new server (Xen 4.0.1 with pvops kernel 2.6.32.24), I have bad performance on bandwidth I have test with a files copy and "iperf". Result iperf average: Transfert Bandwidth XEN-A -> Windows

I'm only doing one frame using speex_encode_int greatly simplifies my code I'm not sure why the sample I was working off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) {

I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre7. save/restore should be working for 32 bits on both SMP and UP, and maybe for 64 bits although it''s not tested. If someone could test migration it would be much appreciated. The installer seems to not install the drivers under 64 bit environment... but they can then be installed manually. Not sure why at this point.

I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre7. save/restore should be working for 32 bits on both SMP and UP, and maybe for 64 bits although it''s not tested. If someone could test migration it would be much appreciated. The installer seems to not install the drivers under 64 bit environment... but they can then be installed manually. Not sure why at this point.

Hi, I am using the speex 1.0.4 library from Windows. I have posted my problem before but didn't get a solution. I am doing an VOIP project in which i am recording sound and streaming it to the peer. I wanted to encode and decode wav files that brought me to this site. I am recording sound in the following format:- m_WaveFormatEx.wFormatTag = WAVE_FORMAT_PCM;

I'm getting garbled playback with decoded fragments and I'm hoping someone here can point me in the right direction to correcting the problem. Essentially I'm capturing audio from the microphone. I stream it over the net, but for testing purposes with this API I'm just grabbing the whole chunk and encoding / decoding it right away and then updating the sound buffer for

Alright noted, I changed me code so that the state is created in the constructor and destroyed in the destructor of the object. However I'm still getting the same issue although I'm sure that would have bit me sooner or later. The new code is as follows. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) { short *in=(short*)inputBuffer;

Hi, I have just started to work with Xen and have a question regarding the expected network throughput. Here is my configuration: Processor: 2.8 GHz Intel Celeron (Socket 775) Motherboard: Gigabyte 8I865GVMF-775 Memory: 1.5 GB Basic system: Kubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake Xen version: 3.02 (Latest 3.0 stable download) I get the following iperf results: Src Dest Throughput Dom0 Dom0

Hi, I am seeing a performance degradation while using libvirt to start my vm (kvm). vm is fedora 12 and host is also fedora 12, both with 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686. Here are the statistics from iperf : >From VM: [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 199 MBytes 55.7 Mbits/sec >From host : [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 331 MBytes 92.6 Mbits/sec libvirt command as seen from ps output : /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -S -M

Hi I am search a sample config for my linux box: Shorewall 3.2.3 Eth0 => Internet Access 4Mbits on ethernet Eth1 => Lan Eth2 => Lan 2 Eth3 => Lan 3 i want limit the internet access: Eth1 = 2 Mbits Eth2 = 0,5 Mbits Eth3 = 1,5 Mbits but if eth1 don''t use 2 Mbits other lan can use it anyone have a simple sample config for help me ? Thanks bye

Hi all. We have a performance problem over a 2 Mbits radio link. The configuration is as follows: we have a RH Linux 6.1 (double PIII processor, 100 mbit ethernet, raid 5), acting as a server for a network of Windows 95, 98 and NT. On the local network I can achieve up to 40 mbits transferring large files from the server to a windows 98 machine. This network is connected through a 2 mbits radio

> > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Sorry for the delay, had some problems with my mailbox, and I realized > > just now that > > my reply wasn't sent. > > The vm indeed ALWAYS utilized 100% cpu, whether polling was enabled or > > not. > > The vhost thread utilized less than 100% (of the other cpu) when polling > > was disabled. >

> > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Sorry for the delay, had some problems with my mailbox, and I realized > > just now that > > my reply wasn't sent. > > The vm indeed ALWAYS utilized 100% cpu, whether polling was enabled or > > not. > > The vhost thread utilized less than 100% (of the other cpu) when polling > > was disabled. >

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU