similar to: Server unresponsive until reboot, memory exhausted

Just noticed this, <http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/relators/>. MARC (Library of Congress) relators are now part of Dublin Core, this allows refinements to meta-data like actor, composer, instrumentalist (of interest to kitchen sink metadata in Ogg/Vorbis). It still falls short of the more qualified relationships that might be available with Musicbrainz advanced relationships (eg

I wanted to post publicly my problem with Jonathan's proposed album requirements. Although I do apologize, since this thread is too big already. The idea that as a requirement one should be able to identify the exact CD a track was ripped from is not a valid requirement in my book (not for the tags at least), and I hope I can explain why. Without knowing the exact way Jonathan wishes to

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:19:05PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > as artist=(composer) Beethoven), I think cast lists for films present > a similar problem. There is consistency and indexability to be > addressed (Ludvig van Beethoven; Beethoven, Ludvig van; > Beethoven). ID3 has a concept of "sort" tags, which provide a string for sorting purposes which is different from the

Help! I'm researching Vorbis as a solution for talk programming archiving (obviously more affordable for the budget conscious public radio stations than Real). An important feature will be the abillity to search the metadata of the audio files. Is this functionality already available with b4? I've also research an open standard for meta data tagging called MusicBrainz and they mention

I discovered FLAC earlier this year, and wrote flac-archive to archive my CDs to single FLAC files. I've been archiving my collection for months now, and have gotten it to a reasonable level of stability and robustness. I recently looked over this list's archive and saw a number of questions about doing this, with no clear solution emerging. So, here i am to offer my meager tools.

Is there any good tagger for CentOS 6? -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****

On 14 Sep 2007 at 15:52, Ian Malone wrote: > Vorbis comments could do better than they currently do > but no-one seems compelled to implement any of the exotic > tag proposals that have hung around for years. Exotic tag proposals?! Do you mean the ones linked from the wiki? As far can tell, the only roadblock to "implementation" (by which, I assume you mean support from

I need some sort of utility to calculate a checksum of an Ogg file. Two differently encoded Ogg:s should give different checksums, but the same file with different tags should give the same result. (The serial number doesn't work here, obviously. I need something that is changed if a bit of the file is lost.) -- Björn Lindström <bkhl@elektrubadur.se> http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/

On 12 Eki 2012, at 20:00, Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: > >> Dear Tim, >> >>> >>> The JIT sounds like it does almost exactly what you want. LLVM's JIT >>> isn't a classical lightweight, dynamic one like you'd see for >>> JavaScript or Java.

Dear Jim, On 12 Eki 2012, at 21:17, Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: > >> >> On 12 Eki 2012, at 20:00, Jim Grosbach wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 12, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Tim,

Dear Tim, > > The JIT sounds like it does almost exactly what you want. LLVM's JIT > isn't a classical lightweight, dynamic one like you'd see for > JavaScript or Java. All it really does is produce a native .o file in > memory, take care of the relocations for you and then jump into it (or > provide you with a function-pointer). Is there any other reason you >

On Oct 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: > > On 12 Eki 2012, at 20:00, Jim Grosbach wrote: > >> >> On Oct 12, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: >> >>> Dear Tim, >>> >>>> >>>> The JIT sounds like it does almost exactly what you

I am generating LLVM IR code and I would like to convert this IR code to native code using the LLVM C++ API. This would be very similar to what's done in the Kaleidoscope tutorial, but instead of relying on JIT compilation, I'd like to emit native code -- the same native code that's produced by llc, for instance. I'm sure this is possible, but I wasn't able to find the

I was looking at the Freeamp stuff and I looked at their RDF metadata stream spec. (http://www.musicbrainz.org/MM). I noticed on that page it says, "Furthermore, this format will hopefully be used by the Open Source audio codec Vorbis to store audio/video metadata with the audio/video tracks." Is this the metadata format planned for Vorbis? If so, how would it be embedded in the .ogg?

I've put together the first attempt to defining an RDF metadata vocabulary for use with the CD Index/MusicBrainz/OggVorbis. If you care about metadata issues, please take a look at: http://www.cdindex.org/MM I've included a section for video specific stuff, but everything that I originally had in there is being covered by the MM:Contributors section. The Contributors stuff will allow

Hi, I'm building LLVM IR. I'd like to compile this IR to native code (I don't want JIT) and immediately load it to execute. So far, I've the following: 1) I can emit the IR to native assembly/object file doing the same thing llc does (using TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile). 2) I can dynamically load a precompiled .so file (using llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary::getPermanentLibrary),

On Oct 12, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: > Dear Tim, > >> >> The JIT sounds like it does almost exactly what you want. LLVM's JIT >> isn't a classical lightweight, dynamic one like you'd see for >> JavaScript or Java. All it really does is produce a native .o file in >> memory, take care of the

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Baris Aktemur <baris.aktemur at ozyegin.edu.tr> wrote: > I am generating LLVM IR code and I would like to convert this IR code to > native code using the LLVM C++ API. This would be very similar to what's > done in the Kaleidoscope tutorial, but instead of relying on JIT > compilation, I'd like to emit native code -- the same native code

I have a loop that I iterate through in my view. <% coll.each do |itm| puts(itm.value) end %> How do I render the itm.value without using a <%= %> tag? Should puts not work? Joerg P.S. There is a good enough reason for me wanting to do this :-) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Have a problem with flac tags,... need to clean up 100's of .flac tags.... example: (1)_Buff & the Skylights - Wishing You.flac 07 have a great day.flac ^^Love for ever - Muffin Men.flac (spaces) As you can see, there are allot of problems, and I don't have the time to hand tag each .flac file. ---- is there ANY thing for Linux, that can ( RE-tag ) .flac files, ie: do a lookup