similar to: use parted to create "raw paration"????

On 08/09/2017 01:48 PM, hw wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled >> from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). >> Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on >> the console. Here is an example: >> >> [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14

Dear experts, I try not to trouble the list again after this question. I want to print this vector into a file > myvec [1] --Control --Control --Control --Control --Control HBA2 HBA1 [8] HBA1 --Control HBB --Control HBB HBA1 MBP [15] --Control HBA1 HBA2 HBB PTGDS GAPDH UBC [22] --Control GAPDH TPT1 HUWE1 PRM1 CKM

Hi all, I used a kickstart script to setup a new machine of mine with RAID 1 (I couldn't get anaconda to create matching partition schemes). So I've now got /dev/sdg1 and /dev/sdh1 as 'bios_grub' (/dev/sd{a-f} are a separate array). 0 root at an-nas02:~# parted /dev/sdg print free Model: ATA ST3000NC000 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdg: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical):

Dear List, Would anyone know how to perform prepared queries with ROBC ? I had a shot with some of the internal (non-exported) functions of the package but ended up with a segfault, so I prefer asking around before experimenting further... Thanks, Laurent

Dear Srs, I get this error when running "mkfs.ocfs2": ================================================================================= # mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4K -C 32K -N 255 -L backup_ocfs2_001 /dev/sdb1 mkfs.ocfs2 1.2.7 Filesystem label=backup_ocfs2_001 Block size=4096 (bits=12) Cluster size=32768 (bits=15) Volume size=6000488677376 (183120382 clusters) (1464963056 blocks) 5678 cluster

Greetings. I'm trying to recreate in R some regression models I've done in SAS, but I'm not getting the same results. My advisor suspects this may be due to differences in precision between R and SAS. Does anyone know where I can find specifications for R's type double? (It doesn't seem to be in the R Language Definition.) Thanks in advance for any help anyone can

OK todays problem. I have a HP N54L Microserver running centos 6.5. In this box I have a 3x2TB disk raid 5 array, which I am in the process of extending to a 4x2TB raid 5 array. I've added the new disk --> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb And grown the array --> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=4 Now the problem the resync speed is v slow, it refuses to rise above 5MB, in general

In the non linear mixed effects package a groupedData object can be created to facilitate modeling. The gD object includes a formula of the form 'response variable' ~ 'primary covariate' | 'grouping factor'. In experiments creating response surfaces there are 2 or more primary covariates. Is there any way to use the groupedData() function to include 2 primary

I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on the console. Here is an example: [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK [168177.004050] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 CDB: Read(10)

Hello again, Been an interesting day. I'm attempting to use parted to create a partition on a 28TB volume which consists of 16x2TB drives configuired in a Raid 5 + spare, so total unformatted size is 28TB to the OS.. However upon entering parted, and making a gpt label, print reports back as follows; Model: Areca ARC-1680-VOL#000 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdc: 2199GB Sector Size

We just got in a few server-class drives. They're Seagate Constellations, 3TB. I went to partition and format, and did a mklabel gpt in parted. Ooops. It claims Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B After data sheet that doesn't tell me, and a long wait*, I spoke to a Seagate tech, who agreed that it *is* 4k physical. This is CentOS 6.2 Anyone know any way to correct this, or if

HI all, I just did a fresh C7 install using kickstart. fdisk -l /dev/sda shows: # Start End Size Type Name 1 2048 2050047 1000M EFI System EFI System Partition 2 2050048 104450047 48.8G Microsoft basic 3 104450048 112642047 3.9G Linux swap 4 112642048 234440703 58.1G Microsoft basic What extra do I need to

Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:03:03 -0400 I am not sure exactly where the problem is here. I am using a sieve script that sorts various incoming messages into their own mailbox. MS Outlook does not show those folders if they are not directly under INBOX. EXAMPLE: drwx------ 31 vmail vmail 1.0K 2014-07-19 14:46:55 EDT ./ drwx------ 3 vmail vmail 512B 2014-07-02 13:52:03 EDT ../ drwx------ 5

Trying to set up UEFI Syslinux boot on an ArchLinux USB 4GB stick. - Host system: 64-bit Ubuntu 14.10 on 56 GB hard drive - Hardware: ASUS P8H77-I, Bios v1101, i7-3770 at 3.40 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 - ArchLinux Instructions followed: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Syslinux#UEFI_Systems > ? ? 2. UEFI Systems > 2.2 Installation - Arch syslinux v.6.03 196352 Oct 13 22:25 /usr/sbin/syslinux

I am experimenting with KVM and I wish to create a virtual machine image in a logical volume. I can create the new lv without problem but when I go to format its file system then I get these warnings: Warning: WARNING: the kernel failed to re-read the partition table on /dev/sda (Device or resource busy). As a result, it may not reflect all of your changes until after reboot. Warning: Unable to

I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows: /sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart primary fat32 Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] 11:

This is a post I sent by mistake directly to Ady without a reply to all (i.e., to the thread "Fail to set up UEFI syslinux on ArchLinux USB Flash Drive") It should go between Ady's post of Sun Mar 15 13:23:26 PDT 2015 and Ady's post of Mon Mar 16 06:03:58 PDT 2015 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: alex lupu <alupu01 at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:07

Results for parted: parted /dev/sda print Model: ATA KINGSTON SUV5001 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 120GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 1050MB 1049MB fat32 EFI System Partition boot 2 1050MB 53.5GB 52.4GB ext4 3 53.5GB 57.7GB 4194MB

@Alex, please next time use "Reply All" (instead of the simple "Reply") for the mailing list emails; that way the emails will get to the Syslinux Mailing List (instead of arriving to particular members). Now, to the matter in question... (snip) > > Just a minor detail (but it helps for understanding each other)... > > You probably mean "in UEFI

RHEL 5's old parted didn't have the -m option. A number of commands relied on this option and thus would break on RHEL 5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598309 This rather large patch adds a second parsing path which allows us to parse the old text-based output (it preserves the code for parsing the output of the -m option too, since if supported, that is more accurate).