similar to: noatime effect

Did someone of you find a solution for our problerm ??? I send you the documented as you asked it but I always got the same problems. I tried some possibilites for optimizing my system but I always stay with my problem for writing files. Reading files from my shares is not a problem but writing causes "buffers" problems with windows and windows says he could not write all the blocks.

Hi all, I was trying to mount root-partition which is ext3 partition with noatime and ro option. I included "ro" in the kernel command line But for mounting it with "noatime" option when I searched for some solution I came across a patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/5/38 But after applying this patch and including option "noatime" in

When mounting a Windows share within Linux the noatime option seems to be ignored. I use the following command mount -tsmbfs -ousername=user,noatime //192.168.0.12/eclipse /mnt/tmp Each cat /mnt/tmp/testfile updates the last access time regardless if noatime specified or not. I'm running smbmount v2.0.7 on a old Suse production system, but I could reproduce the same behaviour with a current

I have read archives about two-factor authentication on this list and it is interesting and can open up a can of worms. I don't intend on opening a can of worms or spur debate. As far as I can tell, authentication to openssh can be performed by signing a connection request with a private client key & having the server decrypt the key with the public key. The other way to authenticate (of

Will Dovecot be negatively impacted if I change my XFS mount options to noatime,nodiratime? Thanks. -- Stan

Hi I have a single filesystem i don't mount noatime because mutt would work very good otherwise. Today, in a discussion about mkisofs, i learned that Linux since 2.6.8 supports "O_NOATIME" as an option to open. (see "man 2 open") So how comes that rsync doesn't do that and/or there is no option to switch on that behaviour? Bis denn -- Real Programmers

On 05/05/2017 03:33 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2017, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I thought this worked. Many web pages tell you it works. But bash is >> ignoring tabs in my here docs. Worst, where there are two tabs, it is >> functioning as a command expand in bash, where all files in the current >> directory are listed to complete the command. >>

More research... On 05/05/2017 04:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 05/05/2017 03:33 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: >> On Fri, May 05, 2017, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> I thought this worked. Many web pages tell you it works. But bash is >>> ignoring tabs in my here docs. Worst, where there are two tabs, it is >>> functioning as a command expand in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Ben Johnson wrote: > On 8/7/2014 11:14 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >> one idea: http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/exitcodes.html >> >> exit code 134 would be in bash's meaning (if this website is >> correct all) some program died off signal 6. This would be Abort in >> Linux. >> >>

Hi, Here are my settings: I have a samba server running samba 3.0.24 on redhat EL4 (kernel 2.6.9-5.ELsmp) and a samba client running samba 3.2.3-0.20.fc9 on fc9 (kernel 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.x86_64). A share on server is mounted on client using sudo mount //server/data /mnt/data -o user=me,workgroup=group,rw,file_mode=0600,dir_mode=0700 The problems are (in the directory /mnt/data), if I use

Hi everyone, Previously I was using RSYNC 2.5.7 on RedHat 8.0 to mirror CPAN (http://www.cpan.org/) and LDP (http://www.tldp.org/) and everything was working fine. After upgrading to Fedora Core 2 and using RSYNC 2.6.x , I kept on getting the following errors: # rsync -av --stats --delete --force ftp.funet.fi::CPAN rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (9382362 bytes received so far)

Hello Everyone, I have a few users that are complaining about the "slowness" of copying files to and saving files directly to the Samba server. From my own recollections, the speed is rather identical to the speed we experienced on our old Windows NT 4.0 fileserver. One thing that could be the impetus of this issue is that Samba is serving up files, for opening and copying from the

We do this by defining DB_DUMP unconditionally and then testing the special exit code given by the shell if the command is not found (see http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/exitcodes.html). Packagers may either: (1) Provide db_dump as a build requirement, but make it a weak dependency at runtime, or: (2) Not provide db_dump at build time, but define DB_DUMP to its expected path when configuring,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Ben Johnson wrote: > On 7/29/2014 11:20 AM, Ben Johnson wrote: >> On 7/29/2014 3:13 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Ben Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> I have some debugging output in my pipe script; the output looks >>> >>> How does your script looks like?

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542 Bug ID: 3542 Summary: Allow to redirect stderr only even with tty Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Jun Lim via llvm-dev Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:05 AM Hi All, I found some cases where a spill of a live range in a block is reloaded only in one of its successors, and there is no reload in other paths through other successors. Since the spill is reloaded only in a certain path, it must be okay to sink such

Hi All, I found some cases where a spill of a live range in a block is reloaded only in one of its successors, and there is no reload in other paths through other successors. Since the spill is reloaded only in a certain path, it must be okay to sink such spill close to its reloads. In the AArch64 code below, there is a spill(x2) in the entry, but this value is reloaded only in %bb.1, not in

> From: junbuml at codeaurora.org [mailto:junbuml at codeaurora.org] > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:39 AM > > On 2018-02-22 11:14, gberry at codeaurora.org wrote: > > FROM: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] ON BEHALF OF > > Jun Lim via llvm-dev > > SENT: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:05 AM > > > > Hi All, > > > > I

At a snail's pace I keep on translating an introduction to R into italian; I have reached the section describing the glm() function, in which some example code is presented. The very last line of code, before the beginning of the section on Poisson models is: ldp <- ld50(coef(fmp)); ldl <- ld50(coef(fmp)); c(ldp, ldl) which of course gives results 43.663 and 43.663; the correct code

At a snail's pace I keep on translating an introduction to R into italian; I have reached the section describing the glm() function, in which some example code is presented. The very last line of code, before the beginning of the section on Poisson models is: ldp <- ld50(coef(fmp)); ldl <- ld50(coef(fmp)); c(ldp, ldl) which of course gives results 43.663 and 43.663; the correct code