similar to: Gnome 2.32 backported to RHEL6

Hello, If you're interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6, take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6, and how to fetch dom0 capable 2.6.32.x kernel from upstream git repository. It also shows how to get libvirt/virt-manager working with Xen on RHEL6. Hopefully it helps :) --

Hello, If you're interested in running Xen 4.0 hypervisor/dom0 on RHEL6, take a look at here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial It explains steps needed to rebuild Xen 4.0.1 src.rpm from Fedora on RHEL6, and how to fetch dom0 capable 2.6.32.x kernel from upstream git repository. It also shows how to get libvirt/virt-manager working with Xen on RHEL6. Hopefully it helps :) --

It turns out augeas on RHEL6 is 0.7.2, which does not have ''setm'' command available. ''setm'' is available in augeas release 0.8, which is available in EPEL, but not available for RHEL6 (the reason is the package is already in RHEL6, thus no package would be released in EPEL for this. All I want to do is to put console=ttyS0 on all kernel lines in /etc/grub.conf.

On 09/12/2017 02:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. >> Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. >> >> Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? >> >> I am

I''m attempting to run Puppet 3.2.3 on RHEL6 and am running into key problems. The keys seem to be exchanged, or at least the puppet master receives the key from the client: lib_puppet2.library.nd.edu|root no_ora /var/lib/puppet 1029$ puppet cert list --all + "puptest1.library.nd.edu" (SHA256)

We have done some benchmarking tests using dovecot 2.0.12 to find the best shared filesystem for hosting many users, here I share with you the results, notice the bad perfomance of all the shared filesystems against the local storage. Is there any specific optimization/tunning on dovecot for use GFS2 on rhel6??, we have configured the director to make the user mailbox persistent in a node, we will

On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of > that upgrade from

Hi, First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0. I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6. If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/dovecot/2.1.0/ Feedback would be appreciated. After some testing, we will use these RPMs on our IMAP servers. Best regards, Morten

Dear All, I've seen posts to the effect that.. 1) choose.dir is only available for windows, and 2) tk_choose.dir would be the linux equivalent. I'm still having trouble with the subject package on linux/rhel6. I've specified --with-tcltk during ./configure, and I still get the response... > install.packages("tcltk") Installing package(s) into

Hello, I am working on building an internal repo for RHEL6 x86_64 and I don''t see any augeas rpms in the puppetlabs repo? There are for i686 but not x86_64? Are the rpms "noarch" that can be used for both? -chrisl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to

I tried installing the Asterisk 11 RHEL6 packages from packages.asterisk.org I followed this guide: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Packages The SRTP support appears to be missing though. I notice libsrtp was not automatically installed as a dependency, and no srtp module exists under /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules Is it still necessary to do a source build every time SRTP is

Hello, I'm running a LXC guest using libvirtd under RHEL6. The guest has this particular memory behavior that I'm unable to explain. I've the following memory settings for this guest's memory. Inside the guest I'm running a Apache webserver serving PHP scripts and static content. <memory unit='GB'>2</memory> <currentMemory

On Sep 12, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of > that upgrade from Apache 2.2 to

> I don't have any official knowledge, but I would suspect that they will > maintain httpd-2.2 throughout the lifetime of RHEL6. Security issues > would be backported. (If older versions of RHEL are any indication) The basic problem is though that there won't be any security fixes for 2.2 How can they back port something that does not exist? Or do you mean you think

I have a RHEL6 that hosts many kvm virtual machines. It has been working fine for a couple years. I apply errata updates about once a week. In the last couple weeks, I've ran into a bug where the virtual machines start failing to start with a cgroup error message. If I reboot the host (very disruptive) then things start working normaly for a few days. Can I configure qemu/libvirt not to use

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working

Hi folks, I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of that upgrade from Apache 2.2 to Apache 2.4 ? thanks, -Alan -- "You should sit in nature for 20 minutes a day. Unless you are busy, then

Hey folks, I''ve encountered a rather interesting/frustrating issue with RHEL6 domU''s and live migration. I have no problems booting a RHEL6 domU using its stock/native kernel on Xen 3.4.1 or Xen 3.4.3. But in terms of live migration, there seems to be a problem when moving from a higher (in terms of CPU MHz) to lower (MHz) system -- even if the higher of the two is a much

G'Day, I've been looking at our minimum python version for the AD DC. We have some patches currently being proposed to help us become compatible with the modern Python3, and one aspect (PyCapsule) would be easier to do if we restricted Samba to requiring Python 2.7 as a minimum. The wrinkle comes from our good friends at Red Hat, which found itself caught with Python 2.6 on RHEL6.

Anyone had tried the save/restore against rhel6 guest? I found it always throw timeout when I tried to save the guest. And only fail with rhel6 guest.(ubuntu, fedora are ok). best regards yang _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel