similar to: Strange ntp behaviour?

HI Team, I am currently working on problem and stumped on "for" loop. Data: structure(list(Coutry = structure(c(3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L), .Label = c("J", "M", "U"), class = "factor"), State = structure(c(1L, 1L, 4L, 2L, 5L, 5L, 3L, 6L), .Label = c("A", "C", "K", "O", "S",

Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday, thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report section... Also not sure why there's an issue with automount either.... but I guess I could ask on that issue as well. I am not worried about the NAMED error, this is something that happens due to one of the services that

Hi all, I have a problem with ntpd daemon in my CentOS7 vm. When I try to list peers, command fails: [root at c7tst ntpstats]# ntpq ntpq> pe ntpq: read: Connection refused ntpq> My actual ntp.conf: # For more information about this file, see the man pages # ntp.conf(5), ntp_acc(5), ntp_auth(5), ntp_clock(5), ntp_misc(5), ntp_mon(5). driftfile /var/lib/ntp/drift # Permit time

Author: blu Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 9dfbca422b39aadbbb66a2a06662c20916e08edb Log message: 4529113 Leitch refclock driver should set precision Files: update: usr/src/cmd/xntpd/xntpd/refclock_leitch.c

Hi All, I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space). It is being sent to root at www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch all so it does get to me. How do I change where this e-mail is sent? I have tried in /etc/postfix/main.cd, master.cf, bounce.cf.default, etc and I don't see

My server is supposed to be using ntp, with nothing changed from the defaults set up by CentOS5. However, daily I see log entries like Total synchronizations 2 (hosts: 2) **Unmatched Entries** sendto(193.6.222.20) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s) sendto(141.89.226.2) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s) Does this mean that ntp is failing? I assume so, and if so, how do I change

On 03/09/2015 03:42 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, C.L. Martinez wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a problem with ntpd daemon in my CentOS7 vm. When I try to list >> peers, command fails: [....] >> >> [root at c7tst ntpstats]# ntpq >> ntpq> pe >> ntpq: read: Connection refused >> ntpq> > > Does "ntpq -4 -c

If samba and xntpd are running, you're done! Samba is a time server. Setting the smb.conf parameter "time server = yes" will cause Samba to advertise itself as a time server in the browse list through nmbd. Regardless of this setting, clients can still set their time with the "net time" command. -Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061

I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. I also configured NTP point to out time server. I found /var/log/messages file every 20 to 30 minutes will generate a error message : Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument Mar 15 14:45:22 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument Mar 15 15:02:29 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16):

I'm just curious if anyone has the X100P & Callerid receiving working outside US. Replies are appreciated. Also if it's not working for you in a certain coutry you can respond too. regards Martin

The Skype network is circulating a virus that has appeared there before: http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=198500135 . The virus sends a URL to other Skype users in the infected user's contacts, which the target Skype displays as clickable. Clicking downloads the virus. Asterisk supports features like these, in combination with certain clients (which aren't

I never thought it would happen to me, but it did... I have read threads about slow copies from WinXX to Linux/Samba on the list in the past, but I don't recall a concise answer regarding what the cause was. THE PROBLEM: Trying to copy an 8 meg file from Win95 to my Linux/Samba box (named "Nemesis" - for good reason), the transfer speed slows to a crawl. The Win95 copy dialog box

Hi, I have a set of servers whose system time is drifting. I am running ntp client on CentOS 5.8. My config is here -> http://fpaste.org/s55U/ Anything i am missing? Regards, Kaushal

I thought I'd play with making my system an ntp server. I did the "service ntpd start" it started OK. on my laptop I did "ntpdate IP" and it says no server for sync found. My firewall has open ntp:udp What did I miss? Thanks, Jerry

Hi folks, Have there been any changes to the way ntpd behaves in the past few updates? Reason I ask, whenever I run the ntpq or ntpdc, I immediately get a response of Name or service not known. I know things used to work sometime back, and never saw this kind of stuff. Nothing has changed in the /etc/ntp.conf file, nor has anything changed in the /etc/ntp/ntpservers files. T

Hi On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue. What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct the time. Is there something 'special' i need to do in order for the drift to work? $ cat /etc/ntp.conf restrict default

I am having a terrible time getting the hardware clock, system clock and the time served to my winXX boxes to jive on my Mandrake 7.2/Samba 2.07 machine. I have my clock file, timezone and localtime links set to America/Chicago. No matter what I do, if I use UTC for my hwclock, my system clock on the Linux box is fine, but samba passes system time +6 hours to the windows clients. (Yes I know CST =

I don't think my original post made it, so here is a repost of my problem. I am having a terrible time getting the hardware clock, system clock and the time served to my winXX boxes to jive on my Mandrake 7.2/Samba 2.07 machine. I have my clock file, timezone and localtime links set to America/Chicago. No matter what I do, if I use UTC for my hwclock, my system clock on the Linux box is

Hi, using SLES10 I''m unable to synchronize the time of DomU with that of Dom0. There is a persistent offset of about 3 seconds! Here''s a small history (not actual output): remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter rkdvmso1.dvm.kl 192.168.0.11 5 u - 64 1 0.136 -2977.1 0.099 *rkdvmso1.dvm.kl 192.168.0.11 5 u 2 64

OK, So what you people say is : 1. Run "ntpdate" during startup only once 2. After that, keep time with ntpd Right ? Regards, spyros ---- "I merely function as a channel that filters music through the chaos of noise" - Vangelis