similar to: firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Lars Hecking <lhecking at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > ?Possibly. Or possibly not. On a closely related topic, can you comment on > ?whether or not it's a good idea to install the nspluginwrapper rpms on x86_64? > ?They seem to be fundamentally broken. > I don't think you need it anymore with FF 3.6.

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0782 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0782.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 1d76f8ea733023360514810ed885638b firefox-3.6.11-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm 575961cc6506ee441290aad8b51cbd5e firefox-3.6.11-2.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

After my / disk seemed to be failing and found many files disappeared, I decided to remove it. I moved my other disk to it's place. Long story omitted. After installing my backup of /home and seeing firefox not restart, I started it from the command line with the immediate error: Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.5 and 1.9.0.5. I'm sorry, I'm at a complete loss.

I once had firefox x86_64 installed (because it was the default). But that one has problems with plugins (flash, java), which are much easily solved by using the i386 version. So I unstalled firefox, and installed it again using: yum install firefox.i386 This worked, and even the plugins worked fine afterwards. I did have some problems when uninstalling, because yum insisted on a whole load

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0782 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0782.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: d6d74606e240b46e24a6e5fef808fc6e firefox-3.6.11-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm ceea764509f836a4222d8513e48a2f4a nss-3.12.8-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0112 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0112.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: af85d2bab4fd84678522fa921ad7c65d firefox-3.0.18-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm 17a22cb02ee8ac264f6f5f169266443f xulrunner-1.9.0.18-1.el5_4.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0112 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0112.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: af85d2bab4fd84678522fa921ad7c65d firefox-3.0.18-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm 17a22cb02ee8ac264f6f5f169266443f xulrunner-1.9.0.18-1.el5_4.i386.rpm

Just wondering if anyone might be seeing any similar frequent crashes of Firefox/GNOME/Nautilus lately. I have a couple of users who have reported a problem like this. Any ideas are welcome. Latest CentOS 5.5 w/patches, latest nVidia graphics driver, firefox from repos. | ###!!! ABORT: Request 0.0: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such | operation): file nsX11ErrorHandler.cpp, line 182 |

I have CentOS5.3 installed on the system. I have updated firefox to firefox-3.6.11-2.el5.centos. While doing any work on the internet, suddenly the system logs out. What can be the problem? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101101/555a4463/attachment-0002.html>

Hello all, Well, my local mirror now has CentOS 5.6! Yay! But, I cannot get it to install. A "yum update" and a "yum --skip-broken" yields me this: --> Processing Conflict: firefox conflicts xulrunner >= 1.9.2.14 --> Finished Dependency Resolution firefox-3.6.13-2.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> firefox conflicts with xulrunner

Does there exist *anywhere* a Java web browser plugin for 64-bit FireFox? The SUN 1.6<mumble> JDK (jdk-6u18-linux-amd64.rpm) does NOT include the Java web browser plugin library. java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm does not have one either. Should I install the *32-bit* SUN 1.6<mumble> JDK and use the 32-64 bit wrapper? I've searched the web and read the wiki

Hello, I noticed something unusual today. If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size I'm using. I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and i386: $ echo test >test.txt $ ls -l test.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 filbranden filbranden 5 Mar 11 17:24 test.txt $ du -h test.txt 8.0K

On 06/21/2016 01:50 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I just setup a CentOS 6 desktop with the nux-dextop repository activated. > > When installing GIMP (yum install gimp), I get a gimp package as well as > a gimp28 package. I understand this is the Nux-Dextop GIMP 2.8 package. > Unfortunately this doesn't work so well with my system. It's not > localized (menus

I am ''raking'' my brain to fix this problem - I have searched, googled, looked through rake documentation, wiki.rubyonrails and I can''t fix... This works $ rake plugindoc (in /home/craig/ruby-db/th-db) rdoc -o doc/plugins/ez_where --title ''Ez Where Plugin Documentation'' -- line-numbers --inline-source -T html

What's the deal with all of the new dependencies for xulrunner-devel in the last update? I'm updating my servers and the update for xulrunner-devel is forcing me to install 43 new packages! Is this a packaging problem, or are all of those packages really needed? For the moment, I've been removing xulrunner-devel from my machines to avoid the problem. I figure since it is a

In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than centos. Manual installation of affected rpms using --nodeps (I don't advise this) did not apear to impair the

Hello, I read an article on the site lwn.net (http://lwn.net/Articles/397034/). My question (a newbie question !) is : where may I find these packages xulrunner-1.9.2.7-2.el5.x86_64.rpm and firefox-3.6.7-2.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm ? Regards, Yann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

The latest Sun Java release is jre-1_5_0, and unlike the recent versions of j2re-1_4_2-0[2345], this one does work with Firefox 1.0PR, Mozilla 1.7.3 and Netscape 7.1 (and hopefully other Mozilla-based browsers). >From http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/faqs/java.html: Java Runtime Environment 5.0 has been released, and fixes many problems users are having with Java. Go get it!. -- Brian D.

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When