similar to: ipvs and destination hashing...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "ipvs and destination hashing..."

2006 Dec 22
1
IPVS connections not removed
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font color="#000000">Hi centos users,<br> <br>
2007 Sep 16
0
Port forwarding from dom0 to bridged domU with IPVS
Hi list, We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of : . a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386 This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will only have one public IP. Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables / netfilter. We didn''t really
2005 Feb 21
1
keepalived on centos 3.4
Is anyone successfully using dag's keepalived-1.1.10-1.1.el3.rf on centos 3.4? It's giving me some strange issues (LVS Topology never shows up, even though I can manually set it w/ ipvsadm) Attempting to rebuild it has been less than successful, as anyone who tries will see in their appropriate BUILD/keepalived-1.1.10/config.log and in the rpmbuild output. It complains about openssl
2011 Mar 08
2
keepalived+LVS
hello, all! if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ? tks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>
2018 Apr 23
3
[Bug 1247] New: Module crash due to broken count
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1247 Bug ID: 1247 Summary: Module crash due to broken count Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: other OS: other Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: unknown Assignee: netfilter-buglog at
2006 Jun 29
1
CentOS 4.3 (Final) need IPVS
Hello All Currently on a CentOS 4.3 system with the 2.6.14.3 kernel. Is there a recommend way to properly recompile the kernel? I was thinking of dling the source from kernel.org, but I was told that using SRPMs would be better? Any suggestions ? Thank You -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2009 Jun 29
1
IPVS support in current kernel
Is the IP Virtual Server available by default in the stock 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5? Or shall I compile my own kernel? I did check "config-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5" yet I am not that sure! :) Usually how long does it take to compile the kernel on a modern machine? I am using CentOS 5.3 32 bit thnx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2012 Oct 23
1
masq rules for LVS
Hi, I need some special masq rules to allow internal servers to resolve public IP''s which are loadbalanced by LVS - the rule are: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m ipvs --vaddr <LVS PUBLIC IP>/32 --vport 80 -j SNAT --to-source <LVS INTERNAL IP> Also I need to enable: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack Currently I do all this from /etc/shorewall/started - but is
2001 Dec 13
1
Linux Virtual Server and EXT3
We are looking to set up a cluster of machines using LVS and running EXT3 on each machine. Does anyone have any feedback on doing this? Any known gotchas? The stable version of IPVS kernel module is for 2.4.12. The latest stable kernel in 2.4.16 The latest patch for ext3 is for 2.4.14 or 2.4.17pre2. Any suggestions on what combo to try? Thanks, Charlie
2018 Jul 26
0
net-next boot error
[ Added Thomas Gleixner ] On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:34:39 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM, syzbot > <syzbot+604f8271211546f5b3c7 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > syzbot found the following crash on: > > > > HEAD commit: dc66fe43b7eb rds: send: Fix dead code in rds_sendmsg
2016 Jan 27
0
HA firewall with tinc
This is a vpn for Disater Recovery sites, so it is not necessary to have a seamless failover, strictly speaking. Encryption instead is mandatory. Testing we found that on Keepalived failover remote Tinc take few seconds to reset the connection and correctly re-connect to the new active firewall (probably new firewall resetting the connection + PingTimeout + some seconds to reconnect). This is
2014 Dec 08
3
How to copy roaming profiles to new server ? ("Group policy client service failed. The logon access is denied")
Am 08.12.2014 um 22:55 schrieb Rowland Penny: > Hi, It sounds very much like a SID problem to me. > > the user 'Fred' with the SID-RID > 'S-1-5-21-4036476082-4153129556-3089177936-1005' is **NOT** the same > user as 'Fred' with the SID-RID > 'S-1-5-21-2025076216-3455336656-3842161122-1005' > > You need to change the domain SID on the new
2017 Sep 17
0
keepalived segfault after upgrade to 7.4
Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm seeing /etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork --log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224 Registering Kernel netlink reflector Registering Kernel netlink command channel Registering gratuitous ARP shared channel Opening file
2016 Jan 27
0
HA firewall with tinc
Hi Saverio, I found conflict: 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:1b:ba:5e VMware, Inc. 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 2) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 3) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 4) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 5) So my assumptions were wrong ! :D Probably Virtual
2016 Jan 27
0
HA firewall with tinc
This is what I want to avoid :D I want an active Tinc virtual interface active with ip identical of the other firewall, without ip conflict on the same network. Do you know if Tun type virtual interface on one host can have same ip address of another host in the same network without ip conflict ? ie if a tun virtual interface can work active without transmitting on real network ? or if such a
2001 Nov 06
2
2.2.14 integration with lvs
Hi, I had to modify 2 files to integrate ext3 patch with lvs patch.. (ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8.gz and ipvs 0.8.2) --- drivers/block/loop.c.orig Tue Nov 6 10:13:48 2001 +++ drivers/block/loop.c Tue Nov 6 10:17:55 2001 @@ -218,14 +218,16 @@ static int lo_send(struct loop_device *l index++; pos += size; UnlockPage(page); -
2014 Jun 11
2
Re: libguestfs supermin error
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:00:16PM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: > Hi RIch > > Below are the logs updated logs of libguestfs-test-tool on ubuntu powerpc... > > libguestfs-test-tool > ************************************************************ > * IMPORTANT NOTICE > * > * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED >
2015 Sep 29
3
Keepalived vrrp problem
Hey guys, I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an install from source. And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Here's more of that log entry: Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA Keepalived_vrrp[44943]: VRRP Instance = VI_1 Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA
2016 Jan 22
0
tinc with ha firewall
Ok, I think synching 2 firewalls are best solution with keepalived active/passive HA, too. I'll try this solution to see if all goes straitforward between failover/failback and tinc communications. Thank you Guus. Best regards Roberto -----Original Message----- From: tinc [mailto:tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org] On Behalf Of Guus Sliepen Sent: venerd? 22 gennaio 2016 10.24 To: tinc at
2016 Jan 27
0
HA firewall with tinc
I think it should work at least for TUN virtual interface as TUn works at IP level. This is a sample configuration. firewall1 lan = 172.16.1.11/19 (ALWAYS ACTIVE) - "Physical Network Interface" - system config as ifcfg-... 172.16.1.10/19 (VIP Keepalived Make active) - Active/Passive configuration with firewall2 firewall1 vpndr1