similar to: make fails with "recompile with -fPIC"

(cross-posted on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78022766) Hi all, I'm trying to compile R as a static library with the -fPIC flag so I can use it within java+JNI (is it only possible ?), but I cannot find the right flags in '.configure' to compile R this way. I tested various flags but I cannot find the correct syntax. for now, my latest attempt was ``` rm -rvf?

The following code currently links incorrectly when linking against a dynamic libc on Ubuntu 12.10 unless -fpic is specified. #include <stdio.h> int main() { fputs("hi\n", stdout); } The reason is that stdout gets a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation, but is of type Object. The ELF writer can't see this, and assumes all R_X86_64_PC32 relocations in dynamic outputs are to functions

I would love to hear from anyone who has successfully built 3.5.0 under Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic Beaver). My attempts have failed, including: export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -fPIC" export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -fPIC" export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fPIC" ./configure --enable-R-shlib --prefix=/usr/lib/R/3.5.0 #### Configure completes normally without errors or warnings make #### make

Hi, I am trying to release a Makefile for building my company's software that will be flexible enough to use the llvm suite of compilers to build shared libraries for talking to USB peripherals. The problem that I am having is that while I am able to build a shared library using llvm-gcc , the llvm-g++ compiler is giving me error messages saying " relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against

Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4. Today I tried installing monodevelop and this is the result of the installation: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/258829139 Now. When I went to my terminal and ran monodevelop... nothing. When I tried to locate the actual executable by running find . -name "*monodevelop*" (kinda overkill, but figured that I'd get this option out of the way), I

Hello, I am encountering a linking failure when using Control Flow Integrity while building a shared library. It looks like the wrong relocation type is being emitted for functions referenced via the PLT. I am using clang 3.9. The error message I get is: /usr/bin/ld.gold: error: /tmp/lto-llvm-df723d.o: requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc against 'free' which may overflow at runtime;

I always failed to build the xen in my enironment, with following error (my gcc version is 4.1.2): > gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -m64 -g > -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD > -MF .libxenlight.so.1.0.0.d -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -Werror

On 9/23/2013 7:07 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The following code currently links incorrectly when linking against a dynamic libc on Ubuntu 12.10 unless -fpic is specified. >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> int main() { >> fputs("hi\n", stdout); >>

I want to make a shared object from Fortran code to be loaded with dyn.load(), but have the following messages: # g77 -c kerimp1.f # R CMD SHLIB kerimp1.o gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o kerimp1.so kerimp1.o -L/usr/lib64/R/lib -lR /usr/bin/ld: kerimp1.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `qweight_' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link

Hi, I'm in the process of migrating from clang5 to clang10. Unfortunately clang10 introduced a negative performance impact. The cause is an increase of PLT entries from this patch (first released in clang7): https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36370 https://reviews.llvm.org/D43383 If I revert that clang patch locally, the additional PLT entries and the performance impact disappear. This

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Steve Gutreuter <sgutreuter at gmail.com> wrote: > I would love to hear from anyone who has successfully built 3.5.0 under > Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic Beaver). This is the wrong list, see R-sig-debian. That said, apt-get update apt-get build-dep r-base wget https://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.5.0.tar.gz tar -xvf R-3.5.0.tar.gz cd R-3.5.0

On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > The following code currently links incorrectly when linking against a dynamic libc on Ubuntu 12.10 unless -fpic is specified. > > #include <stdio.h> > > int main() { > fputs("hi\n", stdout); > } > > The reason is that stdout gets a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation, but is

I suspect the main difficulty the OP is having is building R with shlib support. Steve, can you build from source without the --enable-R-shlib flag on configure? Kevin On 05/23/2018 01:58 PM, Ista Zahn wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Steve Gutreuter <sgutreuter at gmail.com> wrote: >> I would love to hear from anyone who has successfully built 3.5.0 under >>

Hi, Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this; doman.com MX 50 mail.domain.com domain.com MX 100 mail2.domain.com domain.com CNAME www.domain.com -aurf

This bot seems kind of flaky. In the last 100 builds, it has failed "gdb-75-check" 22 times with what is either a linker error or a missing header (or both?): gdb compile failed, /usr/bin/ld: error: /home/buildslave/osuosl_slave/clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75/clang-tests/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/pendshr1.c.o: requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc against 'pendfunc1' which

Hi all, I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to 5 seconds to finally login. My tcpdump -vv weren't producing much output (not good) and my pings to and from that host were normal and almost identical to other hosts on my subnet that had no ssh login delay issues. Log files also showed nothing alarming. My hosts file was missing this at the very end of

Hi all, I'm migrating from my Cent 5.x LDAP server to Cent 6.x. But wondering if there are any advantages to the Directory Server package itself? Been using regular old LDAP server for years now. I manage it both via Webmin and command line as well as some tweaks to a Drupal module. The fail over has always sort of bothered me as the secondary LDAP servers pull vs being pushed to, at

Hi, I've been using qemu-img resize for a few days now, seems fine. But if I du the VMs image file, it still shows the size before resizing. Inside that VM, the new size shows correctly. Is qemu-img resize the right tool for this? Once I qemu-img resize, I then use various fdisk/ LVM tools, etc... to resize within the VM just incase you all were wondering. - aurf

Hi all, Don't mean to double post as I sent this to the general Centos list. But, does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup? This would be a bridge+bond setup of course. If not possible, would I still bond the interfaces on the switch and then bond them in the guest rather then from within the hypervisor? - aurf

Hi, I'm VNCing into my KVM server and opening virt-manager. When trying to manage a newly created guest, I'm finding the mouse pointer stays on the outside of its virtual machine window. Any insight as to why its tracking so oddly? Thanks in advance, - aurf