similar to: "yum -yq --security check-update" spouting lots of text?

How come rpmforge.repo wants to install a whole slew of perl modules, yet if I leave rpmforge.repo out of the update process, none of the perl modules shows up? Here's the rpmforge.repo file.. do any of yall see anything wrong with anything in there? Sam # Name: RPMforge RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise 5 - dag # URL: http://rpmforge.net/ [rpmforge] name = Red Hat Enterprise

Hi ,all : Today I run the "yum update" command on my laptop, which is CentOS 5.4 i386. Then the screen displays the following message : root at kuku ~ > yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirror.centos.net.cn * base: mirror.centos.net.cn * epel: mirrors.sohu.com * extras: mirror.centos.net.cn * rpmforge:

I had some trouble setting up dual monitors on centos with an nvidia card. I managed to track stuff down, so I thought I'd make it public on the list. I have an nvidia quadro nvs 290 in a Dell, recently installed centos5. Same stuff should apply for other nvidia cards. I needed nvidia-x11-drv.x86_64. It is available from rpmforge. Installing rpmforge is described on this

Hi list, I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday, 10th May). I don't run the automated yum-updated and didn't run a yum update yesterday, and no packages were installed. Obviously the entries are old. I was wondering if anyone could offer an explanation? Thanks, Ned --------------------- yum Begin ------------------------ Packages

On 05/31/2016 05:12 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public > libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware is still OK, though > sometimes really old, so the least evil will be to keep CentOS 5 on the > old machines until that version is EOL. > > I've been using CentOS 5 as my main system somewhere

Centos 6 Sounds good to me if You came from 5. and the repros Worked me Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 31.05.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > >> On 05/31/2016 05:12 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public >> libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware

On 05/31/2016 05:12 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public > libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware is still OK, though > sometimes really old, so the least evil will be to keep CentOS 5 on the > old machines until that version is EOL. > > I've been using CentOS 5 as my main system somewhere

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:43 PM, John Doe <jdmls at yahoo.com> wrote: > From: Aft nix <aftnix at gmail.com> > >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:53 PM, John Doe <jdmls at yahoo.com> wrote: >>> ?From: Aft nix <aftnix at gmail.com> >>> >>>> ?I'm developing some kernel module, so i need a stand alone qemu to >>>> ?test my

I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do not play well together and that if I use both, epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority. Alas I had it the other way around. rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity. I no longer need audacity, but would like to fix the situation before some other problem crops up. Would fixing the priorities and telling yum to reinstall all the

Hi, I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware is still OK, though sometimes really old, so the least evil will be to keep CentOS 5 on the old machines until that version is EOL. I've been using CentOS 5 as my main system somewhere between 2007 and 2009. At the time the RPMForge was my favorite third-party repository,

Dear All, there's a security update for libmodplug: This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package. This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on 2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574, CVE-2011-1761). I've the following priorities configured: priority = 1 [base] priority = 1 [extras] priority = 1 [updates] priority = 2

Hi all; I'm actually running RHEL 5.4 I installed the rpmforge centos repo (and disabled it). Then I installed the following: yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install libdvdcss libdvdread libdvdplay libdvdnav lsdvd mplayerplug-in mplayer mplayer-gui compat-libstdc++-33 flash-plugin gstreamer-plugins-bad gstreamer-plugins-ugly gstreamer-ffmpeg libquicktime yum --enablerepo=rpmforge

On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > What do you > need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel? Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find hexedit and gqview for el6 ? Epel has them for el5, but not el6. Fortunately, installing them from rpmforge didn't drag along any dependencies. -- Bob Nichols

I installed Centos on some machines that need long term support. I'm running up against some simple user convenience issues. How to play MP3? I've been really puzzled today that the addon rpm sites like livna, rpmforge, rpmfusion, epel, don't seem to have something like amarok-mp3 or xine-lib-mp3. What am I missing? It can be done in Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora Linux. In the

Is there a package for zoneminder in the std repos (base, rpmfusion, epel), or just on rpmforge? mark "unless someone's got a security DVR to loan us for testing...."

Michael Hennebry wrote: > I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do > not play well together and that if I use both, > epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority. > Alas I had it the other way around. > rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity. > I no longer need audacity, > but would like to fix the situation before some other problem crops up. > >

Just upgraded to 5.4 yesterday morning. (Kudos to those who did that!) That's probably irrelevant to this problem: "yum install mplayer" fails. Here's what happens: ================================================== # yum install mplayer Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, filter-data, kernel-module, keys, kmod, list- : data, merge-conf, security, upgrade-helper,

Hello, It would be nice if we could get a full list of packages which have a wrong sha1 checksum. I don't have the bandwidth for a full mirror of all of Dag's rpms and i also don't have shell access to such a mirror. So a small request for a mirror admin: The following checks the files repodata/*.xml.gz against the sha1 sums in repomd.xml and checks the RPMS/*.rpm files against

# yum install libwpd-devel Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package libwpd-devel.i386 0:0.8.7-3.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libwpd = 0.8.7-3.el5 for package: libwpd-devel --> Finished Dependency Resolution

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1043 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1043.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1f840991f4ec80bfcbd90c844d598645eb115624d383e7eb1cc76b1b8ecc396a libwpd-0.8.7-3.1.el5_8.i386.rpm