similar to: Bug or normal?

Hello there, I am using a Gigabyte H55M-UD2H (Intel H55-Chipset) together with a Core-i5-650. According to Gigabyte Support the Mainboard does support VT-d. Well, actually support says, that VT-d does work on Windows-7 in XP-Mode. They do not test and support Linux though. Did anybody here have success using VT-d on any H55-Board? Perhaps it is some misconfiguration on my side. I tried a

Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:54:34PM +0100, frode wrote: > > I got the following error while rm'ing a 700mb file from an ext3 partition: > > Assertion failure in journal_unmap_buffer() at transaction.c:1857: > "transaction == journal->j_running_transaction" Hmm --- this is not one I think I've ever seen before. > >>EIP; c015ea1a

From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> The pdflush thread is long gone, so this patch removes references to pdflush from btrfs comments. Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> --- I expect this patch to be merged via Al Viro''s VFS tree.

Hi All, We're currently trying to use samba in an embedded application, so we're working with samba 3.0.2a compiled for PPC. We have a test application which will basically write, then read back and compare data files on the disk. The problems we see occur when we try using just over 3500 small files (< 10k each). It seems that after about 200 or so iterations of this test, we start

Testing with a modified copy of the fsfuzz, the btrfs filesystem hanged with the following output in dmesg. The system still remain responsive, except for the terminal that was doing the testing. Any attempt to list files in the btrfs-mounted directory will block as well. I am not sure how to proceed from here. Possibly to reboot the system next. But anyone can shed some suggestion?

Hi all, Firstly if this is a FAQ and I've missed it - let me apologise in advance. I use dovecot as a backup mail store and would now like to purge all mails over a certain age. Is it as simple as using find and rm'ing the results or is there more to it? I'm using maildir if that make a difference? Thanks in advance. Daveh

Would it be possible to enhance this error message? Could the message say how large the limit was that was reached? Is it that the limit for one particular vector has been exceeded (and to how much would it have grown vs. how much was allowed?), or is it that the entire memory space has been exceeded (and rm'ing other objects could fix this)? regards, /iaw [[alternative HTML version

I got a samba server(Linux) to store some data in my PC(windows) frequently. And last night I found that samba can't work. After logined to samba server and found that there's 91 smbd processes with status "D" totally. # ps 169 root 0 SW [pdflush] 170 root 0 DW [pdflush] .... 29534 simon 20608 D /sbin/smbd -D 29548 root 2792 D

I am experimenting with the kernel (as some of you may know), and I have added a whole slew of traces in some relatively sensitive code in the lower levels of the page cache and i/o functions. Most of this tracing not only works but is highly revealing as to what the kernel is doing and why. However, I am now getting this odd content in the trace log (dmesg), and I cannot figure out what it is

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thursday, 26 April 2018 15:36:15 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:58:19PM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> > It's been a while since we introduced drm_dev{get/put} functions >> > to replace reference/unreference in

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:29:27AM -0700, Santha Meena Ramamoorthy wrote: > Replace drm_gem_object_reference/unreference function with *_get/put() > suffixes, because it is shorter and consistent with the kernel > kref_get/put() functions. The following Coccinelle script was used: > > @@ > expression e; > @@ > > ( > -drm_gem_object_reference(e); >

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:38:35PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:17 PM Fernando Ramos <greenfoo at gluegarage.com> wrote: > > > One of the things in the DRM TODO list ("Documentation/gpu/todo.rst") was to > > "switch from reference/unreference to get/put". That's what this patch series is > > about. > > The

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:38:35PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:17 PM Fernando Ramos <greenfoo at gluegarage.com> wrote: > > > One of the things in the DRM TODO list ("Documentation/gpu/todo.rst") was to > > "switch from reference/unreference to get/put". That's what this patch series is > > about. > > The

Hi, I have a P4 3.2 linux server. Every since I upgrade to centos 5.3 I see duplicates when running top - c like: 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.13 [ksoftirqd/0] 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/0] 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/1] 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.64 [ksoftirqd/1] 7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/1] 8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0

Replace reference/unreference with get/put as it is consistent with the kernel coding style. Done using the following semantic patch by coccinelle. @r@ expression e; @@ -drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(e); +drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(e); Signed-off-by: Srishti Sharma <srishtishar at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c | 4 ++--

Replace reference/unreference with get/put as it is consistent with the kernel coding style. Done using the following semantic patch by coccinelle. @r@ expression e; @@ -drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(e); +drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(e); Signed-off-by: Srishti Sharma <srishtishar at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c | 4 ++--

Hi, I've got a big problem with a cx88 DVB card. It is passed through to a CentOS 5.3 domU (dom0 is CentOS 5.3 as well), but when I shutdown the domU, this happens: cx88[0]: mpeg risc op code error cx88[0]: mpeg - dma channel status dump cx88[0]: cmds: initial risc: 0xffffffff cx88[0]: cmds: cdt base : 0xffffffff cx88[0]: cmds: cdt size : 0xffffffff cx88[0]: cmds: iq base

Hi. A friend of mine was doing real-time video decoding on Fedora Core 13 and he had a performance glitch (1/2 a second freeze) every 5-10 seconds. "top" showed flush-253:0 process at the moment of the freeze. Major device number 253 corresponds to device-mapper. I advised my friend to re-install his FC13 without LVM, to see if the glitch is related to LVM. After re-installing FC13

Hi, Since upgrading to "2.6.18-194" I am getting odd messages in the logs. Such as; sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds. The output from > grep '120 seconds' /var/log/messages | tr : ' ' | awk '{print $10}' | sort | uniq -c 6 nfsd 4 pdflush This is from an NFS server that since the upgrade has been

Hi, I''m getting some excessive looking CPU time for ksoftirqd (on CPU0) when running Xen on a Hyperthreaded P4 3Ghz. Any one else seeing this?... [root@localhost ~]# top top - 21:35:23 up 1 day, 12:18, 3 users, load average: 0.06, 0.02, 0.00 Tasks: 53 total, 1 running, 52 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.5% sy, 0.0% ni, 86.0% id, 0.0% wa, 13.5% hi, 0.0% si