similar to: how to set ACLs on windows share

Hi, does anyone remember the rules for port forwarding ? the followings does not work: iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -p tcp ?dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -i eth0 ?dport 80 -j DNAT ?to 192.168.20.1:80 thx lewis

Sorry Andrew, I forgot to send to the list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] CIFS Mount Obeying ACLs Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:32:48 +0100 From: steve <steve at steve-ss.com> To: Andrew Martin <amartin at xes-inc.com> On 27/02/13 01:03, Andrew Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I have configured a Samba 3 fileserver (on Ubuntu 12.04) joined to a Samba

Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share via >> cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also tried it >> with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So I joined a member server like the >> wiki describes. Everything

Hello, I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also tried it with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So I joined a member server like the wiki describes. Everything works fine. I can manage the users and permissions with the RSAT tools. For the linux side I use rfc2307 and winbind on the member. So every user and

Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu

Dear all, The system is Ubuntu 12.04 (latest beta as of yesterday) Bind 9.81 (12.04 standard) Samba 4, also git-cloned yesterday. I've imported a zpool created on another ubuntu system with the same version of zfs-linux (RC-8) http://zfsonlinux.org/ The zpool is working perfectly well; responsive, no errors reported, scrubbed. Samba can see the zpool as part of the greater file system and

Am 23.01.2015 um 10:19 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 23/01/15 07:34, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> >> Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>>> Hello,

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am getting a permission denied when trying to ls as a domain user a > samba mount with windows ACLs (sigh I thought I had this figured > out). I tried to include self descriptive server names and include > them in the info below (fs1: file server, nc: addc, u2gui: ubuntu >

hi list, we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with MacOSX panther and tiger as clients --setup-- [share1] path = /data valid users = @admins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 2770 [share2] path = /data/folder valid users = @noadmins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode

Hi I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ? a simple "smart ups 1000" could be enough ? thx so much!! lewis.

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should be used over both protocols. With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? Posix-ACLs set on the server with setfacl are recogniced on a windows-client. But every change I do on a

Hi, I want to make secure my python http server.. what should i use ? chroot ? there are something more secure ? On my centos server I've SE enabled..then .. sandboxing ? Thanks very much lewis -- Linux and Windows 2003/2008 Server. http://predellino.blogspot.com/

Hi, I am using CIFS 2.01.01 on HPUX11V2. CIFS is running in ADS security-mode. Winbind is used to map the userers from the W2K3-Domain (german) to an tdb-file. The user mapping works fine, but I have problems with the ACLS: setting the ACLS to a file or folder from windows leads in "access denied". I'm the owner of the object and have full access. The really crazy thing is,

hi there - is it possible to share a directory via samba and (kernel-)nfsv4 in parallel and make samba use (ie.: read, write and enforce) nfsv4 acls to implement winnt-acls? i know that using nfs3 and posix acls is working halfway okay, but couldn't find anything useful for nfsv4 and the associated acls - sorry if i missed something obvious. i played around with the nfs4acl_xattr and

I have a situation where I need to share, via Samba, a filesystem mounted via NFSv4. I'm struggling with the best way to make Samba see the NFSv4 ACLs and enumerate them to provide the proper SMB/CIFS access to the files, instead of "Access Denied" errors that I currently get. Looking at the Samba source, the only obvious NFSv4 stuff appears to be the following: - zfsacl, available

August 21, 2017 5:34 PM, "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:37:03 +0000 > "A. James Lewis" <james at fsck.co.uk> wrote: > >> OK, obviously I am slightly sanitising the output here, but I'm >> preserving the case, and just replacing local names with generic ones >> as I did for the

Also, I see the following repeated in syslog:- ==> syslog <== Aug 21 15:25:41 hostname01 winbindd[691]: [2017/08/21 15:25:41.438959, 0] ../source3/libsmb/cliconnect.c:1895(cli_session_setup_spnego_send) Aug 21 15:25:41 hostname01 winbindd[691]: Kinit for HOSTNAME01$@DOMAIN.LOCAL to access cifs/LOCAL_AD02.domain.local at DOMAIN.LOCAL failed: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm

Hello In the Samba Wiki page "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/NFS4_ACL_overview" we can read the following: "If you use the Samba vfs module acl_xattr, you can use the full Windows ACL features but you will not be able to manage the ACLs on the OS of the Samba host directly and you will not have the permissions enforced by the filesystem. Samba is doing permission management in

Hi all, we have special scenario with a slow file share where Samba (maybe combined with other tools) could help by acting like as a CIFS proxy and caching system: We're testing an Alfresco ECM System which has a CIFS subsystem (based on jLAN) that is simply to slow for our needs. In this setup the appserver Alfresco (SUSE on vmwars ESXi) and the clients are on a local LAN with Gb Ethernet