similar to: how to set ACLs on windows share

Hi, does anyone remember the rules for port forwarding ? the followings does not work: iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -p tcp ?dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -i eth0 ?dport 80 -j DNAT ?to 192.168.20.1:80 thx lewis

Sorry Andrew, I forgot to send to the list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] CIFS Mount Obeying ACLs Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:32:48 +0100 From: steve <steve at steve-ss.com> To: Andrew Martin <amartin at xes-inc.com> On 27/02/13 01:03, Andrew Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I have configured a Samba 3 fileserver (on Ubuntu 12.04) joined to a Samba

Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share via >> cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also tried it >> with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So I joined a member server like the >> wiki describes. Everything

Hello, I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also tried it with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So I joined a member server like the wiki describes. Everything works fine. I can manage the users and permissions with the RSAT tools. For the linux side I use rfc2307 and winbind on the member. So every user and

Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu

Dear all, The system is Ubuntu 12.04 (latest beta as of yesterday) Bind 9.81 (12.04 standard) Samba 4, also git-cloned yesterday. I've imported a zpool created on another ubuntu system with the same version of zfs-linux (RC-8) http://zfsonlinux.org/ The zpool is working perfectly well; responsive, no errors reported, scrubbed. Samba can see the zpool as part of the greater file system and

Am 23.01.2015 um 10:19 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 23/01/15 07:34, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> >> Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>>> Hello,

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am getting a permission denied when trying to ls as a domain user a > samba mount with windows ACLs (sigh I thought I had this figured > out). I tried to include self descriptive server names and include > them in the info below (fs1: file server, nc: addc, u2gui: ubuntu >

hi list, we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with MacOSX panther and tiger as clients --setup-- [share1] path = /data valid users = @admins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 2770 [share2] path = /data/folder valid users = @noadmins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

Hi I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ? a simple "smart ups 1000" could be enough ? thx so much!! lewis.

I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should be used over both protocols. With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? Posix-ACLs set on the server with setfacl are recogniced on a windows-client. But every change I do on a

Hi, I am using CIFS 2.01.01 on HPUX11V2. CIFS is running in ADS security-mode. Winbind is used to map the userers from the W2K3-Domain (german) to an tdb-file. The user mapping works fine, but I have problems with the ACLS: setting the ACLS to a file or folder from windows leads in "access denied". I'm the owner of the object and have full access. The really crazy thing is,

Hi, I want to make secure my python http server.. what should i use ? chroot ? there are something more secure ? On my centos server I've SE enabled..then .. sandboxing ? Thanks very much lewis -- Linux and Windows 2003/2008 Server. http://predellino.blogspot.com/

hi there - is it possible to share a directory via samba and (kernel-)nfsv4 in parallel and make samba use (ie.: read, write and enforce) nfsv4 acls to implement winnt-acls? i know that using nfs3 and posix acls is working halfway okay, but couldn't find anything useful for nfsv4 and the associated acls - sorry if i missed something obvious. i played around with the nfs4acl_xattr and

I have a situation where I need to share, via Samba, a filesystem mounted via NFSv4. I'm struggling with the best way to make Samba see the NFSv4 ACLs and enumerate them to provide the proper SMB/CIFS access to the files, instead of "Access Denied" errors that I currently get. Looking at the Samba source, the only obvious NFSv4 stuff appears to be the following: - zfsacl, available

August 21, 2017 5:34 PM, "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:37:03 +0000 > "A. James Lewis" <james at fsck.co.uk> wrote: > >> OK, obviously I am slightly sanitising the output here, but I'm >> preserving the case, and just replacing local names with generic ones >> as I did for the

Also, I see the following repeated in syslog:- ==> syslog <== Aug 21 15:25:41 hostname01 winbindd[691]: [2017/08/21 15:25:41.438959, 0] ../source3/libsmb/cliconnect.c:1895(cli_session_setup_spnego_send) Aug 21 15:25:41 hostname01 winbindd[691]: Kinit for HOSTNAME01$@DOMAIN.LOCAL to access cifs/LOCAL_AD02.domain.local at DOMAIN.LOCAL failed: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm

Hi all, we have special scenario with a slow file share where Samba (maybe combined with other tools) could help by acting like as a CIFS proxy and caching system: We're testing an Alfresco ECM System which has a CIFS subsystem (based on jLAN) that is simply to slow for our needs. In this setup the appserver Alfresco (SUSE on vmwars ESXi) and the clients are on a local LAN with Gb Ethernet

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> >> Hello Jeremy, >> >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client