similar to: Qemu network slow

On Jun 24, 2013 3:28 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > > Not unless you explicitly force the OS to include a driver. http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/MEMDISK#-_Drivers_that_detect_the_MEMDISK_mapped_floppy.2Fdisk.2FISO_image > mattias <mj at mjw.se> wrote: > > >ah i meen that > >so i can boot e.g windows xp? > >let's

ah i meen that so i can boot e.g windows xp? let's say i install a xp image with kvm and booting it with memdisk will it work? how about drivers? On 2013-06-24 20:40, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 06/24/2013 09:00 AM, mattias wrote: >> ccan i boot images created by kvm with memdisc? > Boot, yes. In the *general case* they will not run, however, as you > need a driver to detect and

yes............ if i boot the image with winvblock or the oter if the image starts fine will sound and usb work? On 2013-06-24 23:23, Gene Cumm wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2013 3:28 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com > <mailto:hpa at zytor.com>> wrote: > > > > Not unless you explicitly force the OS to include a driver. > >

No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no

Not unless you explicitly force the OS to include a driver. mattias <mj at mjw.se> wrote: >ah i meen that >so i can boot e.g windows xp? >let's say >i install a xp image with kvm >and booting it with memdisk >will it work? >how about drivers? >On 2013-06-24 20:40, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 06/24/2013 09:00 AM, mattias wrote: >>> ccan i boot

Exist none or only livecd? mail mj at mjw.se telefon 0104906298 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Seems libvirt are broken in centos7? I can start it but Virsh list for example: Connection refused Kvm are installed And the kvm driver installed

I''m complete newbie on xen Must i mount the file-system before i start it I not use lvm _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

ERROR Paravirtualized guests cannot install off cdrom media. Can i not install from cd in a para virt? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Is the rsync a first copy or are you overwriting a previous copy. How fast is the transfer rate with scp? -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Alex Regan [mailto:mysqlstudent@gmail.com] Verzonden: maandag 29 juni 2015 4:46 Aan: libvirt-users@redhat.com Onderwerp: [libvirt-users] Slow network performance issues Hi, I have a fedora21 system that's been running fine under normal network

yes because it worked before the upgrade -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] F?r Nux! Skickat: den 16 februari 2015 23:02 Till: CentOS mailing list ?mne: Re: [CentOS] libvirt There are some useful logs in /var/log/libvirt/, check them. Have you enabled virtualisation in the BIOS? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

If i will use a virtualbox image with xen Must ionly convert it to raw and copy the hole image to a lvm or harddisk Or are it more advanced? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi all, i have trouble to PXE boot KVM-based (network of Linux-bridge) Virtual Machines: very slow transfer pxelinux.cfg. ====== tcpdump on KVM host system ==== [root at kvm-test01 ~]# tcpdump -i virbr1 | grep -v ssh | grep 10.0.5.187 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on virbr1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 17:57:29.809278

[CCing the libguestfs mailing list - as Rich responded on IRC about your question on timeout.] On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Thomas Kee <xsited@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Kashyap, > > Thanks for offering to help. The day job caused a pause and it took me an > hour to reassert where I was in the process. I usually hang out on freenet > as xsited. I am still reading the

We've been carrying this exact patch in RHEL 7 for several years. It reverts the change made in 2014 where we switched to using the virbr0 bridge for libguestfs networking instead of SLIRP. We thought SLIRP was going to become unsupported in qemu, but recently there have been more encouraging signs since it looks like SLIRP will be spun off as a separate project, running as a modular process

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:15:43AM -0700, Sureshkumar Kaliannan wrote: > thanks Richard, > > The experiment was indeed done with nested VM enabled. I am not sure about > the internals, but i thought once overlay is setup the 2 main processes are > sshd and qemu-img convert (reading data from sshd and doing the conversion) Yes this should be true. I wouldn't expect copying to

I eliminated software-bridge( using iperf3 bandwidth/latency on the host and guest was almost the same) and disk write(using qemu-img convert src dest file both on the host and guestvm was comprable) being the issue. Next I profiled both sshd and qemu-img during the conversion phase using bpftools (profile and tcptop) and this is what i see. Time (min) File Size (KB) sshd RX (KB) tcptop

Way are not a ramdisk included with the images from jailtime.org That seems this is needed _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Where to find xen images? If exist _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I have a fedora21 system that's been running fine under normal network activity, but trying to perform a full backup of the 300GB filesystem is taking forever because the network speed appears to be very slow. Using rsync, the transfer speeds reach a max of like 180kB/s. Using rsync to copy files on the local filesystem is greater than 55MB/s, so I don't think it's a disk