similar to: Remove all packages from specific repository

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

Does anyone know if the amavisd-new package in rpmforge has the Courier patch installed? -- Bowie

Hi, I am running Cent OS 5.8 in production. Can someone please explain me about various repositories available in CentOS 5.8 and which third party repos ( http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories) i should use it in Production environment. Help me understand the pros and cons. Regards Kaushal

Is anyone running amavisd and clamd under CentOS-7? Amavisd-new seems difficult to install, and clamd is difficult to find. (I've only added the epel repository, as I had a conflict when I added rpmforge as well.) I take it amavis is still the recommended way to run postfix? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Hi, First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0. I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6. If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/dovecot/2.1.0/ Feedback would be appreciated. After some testing, we will use these RPMs on our IMAP servers. Best regards, Morten

On 03/04/16 22:10, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 03.04.2016 o 04:39, Rob Kampen pisze: >> EPEL maintainers? >> I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV >> being available since Mar 5th. >> for CentOS 6 no update is available yet. >> I used to use rpmforge for this package but that languished for months >> before updates became

Hi folks I'm trying to install amavisd-new on Centos 5.3. There is a lot of failed dependencies errors when I try to install it. My question is, there is a way to automatically get all the rpm dependencies I need and get them saved somewhere in my hard drive for future installations? I'm behind a squid proxy. Thanks in advance. David

Hello all, About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. It runs very well, but it runs on CentOS 5.2, and if I try to upgrade, amavisd-new and clamav break. we are now also at the point where a backup mx will need to be implemented. If necessary I am

I sent this email to the Rehdat list, but I thought the Centos users might be more inclined to have the command-line solution I am looking for, so I thought I would post it here too: I would like to add anti-virus to my email server. Currently I have Postfix, Dovecot, PHP, and Squirrelmail installed. The users only use Squirrelmail to access mail. I am looking for command-line instructions,

In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos 6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge. Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?

I only have one Postfix server running at the moment and have some questions. On that install, I did Amavisd-new with ClamAV, SpamAssassin, Postfix and Dovecot. I know this is a bit off topic, but I'm really hoping for performance guidance. Is the added layer of complexity running Amavis worth the effort on a system with moderate mail flow? Or should I just go down the path of getting

Hi, It is probably a problem with pigeonhole 0.2.5. ... make[3]: *** [managesieve-proxy.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Here is my build log: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/temp/build.log Someone an idea? Best regards, Morten

Hi List, I've been working on documenting an amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav installation for postfix on CentOS5 with regards to writing this up for the Wiki (with invaluable help from forum member WhatsHisName - thanks!). I hope to make a start on a Wiki page in the next week or so, so if anyone has any experience with this combo and would like to offer advice, tips and

Dear All Recently I just setup postfix, dovecot, roundcube etc in a dedicated server. >From roundcuble, I am able to send mail to my gmail account. But from my gmail account, when sent mail to my mail id, that I setup recently, I do not see that email in roundcuble inbox. Neither that mail bounced back in gmail. Not sure, how do I debug this. Kindly let me know how should I proceed to fix

Hi, I want to move my mail server from sendmail to postfix over christmas. I've got a test server running with the following: postfix dovecot postgrey amavisd-new clamav spamassassin I've followed the howto's on the wiki <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos> with the exception that I installed amavisd-new and clamav from the EPEL repo rather than rpmforge. Things work OK with

I should probably find either the amavis or clam list(s) and take this there? Anyway, I have totally rebuilt my machine with clean installs. I have spent time carefully (I hope!) studying the amavis and clamav conf files before starting them and running the tests. Here is what I am getting: Jan 30 14:14:10 test1 postfix/pickup[6682]: DA8082A099B: uid=0 from=<root> Jan 30 14:14:10

On 11/11/16 13:36, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/09/2016 02:07 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> so I have /etc/tmpfiles.d/clamd.amavisd.conf with content >> d /var/run/clamd.amavisd 0755 amavis amavis - >> >> the process owner name and group name are amavis >> this is not quite what you specified - which should it be? > > If "User" is set to amavis in the

Hi I'm trying to install amavisd-new from dag repo on centos3. In the spec file perl dependencies use parenthesis: perl(Digest::MD5) it also uses '-': perl-MailTools The problem is that only the second notation is available: perl-MD5 I know this is an old problem. Is this only centos related? Is there a workaround? Do I have to modify the spec file? I'd like to use yum...

I am a bit puzzled at the versioning scheme of the RedHat clone family. RedHat seems to use integer 4, Tao and Centos does the same. If you do rpm -q --qf '%{version}\n' -f /etc/redhat-release you get '4'. However, Scientific Linux uses 4.0, and that seems to me to be a more logical choise, since presumable there are going to be versions 4.1, 4.2, etc. Is there any good

I'm trying to figure out if this is a bug... I'm running Postfix with Dovecot Authentication and have Amavisd-new as the front end. I fought with the install and in particular being able to send mail.... Auth failed. Hours of looking through all the config files yielded nothing... so I started Googling about. I finally found a comment at the bottom of a blog to check permissions on: