similar to: NFS v4 on Centos and "Cannot allocate memory"

Hi list, Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1? I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros "Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running. mount.nfs4: Permission denied" Is this an CentOS oder an config problem? Greetings Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org> > To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:13:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:03:39PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote: >> >> > On Dec 3,

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:59:47 +0100 > From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE > To: groucho.64738 at hotmail.com > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NFS4 ACLs with samba 3 (or 4) > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > > I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where

Hi all, I have setup a CentOS6.3 x86_64 host to act as a nfs server. According to RHEL6 docs, portmap is not needed when you use NFSv4, but in my host I need to start rpcbind service to make NFSv4 works. My /etc/sysconfig/nfs # # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes" # with yes being the default MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no"

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org> > To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 1:22:06 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:31:36PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote: >> >> Try these pages (U

Thank you for that, i did have a good look at that one. And i use Debian 9, if you test what i posted below in the thread, you will see NFSv4 works fine. Below is missing one more thing, the "allow to delegate (kerberos only) " on the computer object in the AD, should be enabled. And yes, i've see bugchecks also but only on my debian .. Lenny.. Stt.. ;-) .. Its my last lenny

After getting a reasonably configured NFS4 setup working on my Scientific Linux server, I spent a majority of my evening trying to do the same with my Centos 5 box, with fruitless results. Most attempts to mount that server returns the following message: [root at sl01 log]# mount -t nfs4 192.168.15.200:/opt/company_data /mnt mount.nfs4: Operation not permitted As nearest as I can tell, I was

Hi all, Not sure if this will be useful to anyone. Worse, it's probably not complete or correct, but I thought I would throw this out there for comment. I asked earlier about configuring libvirt for NFSv4 support. I wanted to define NFSv4 pool from xml config, but it's not an option. I decided to hack a bit. Added the following to source code: storage_conf.h(417):

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:59:47 +0100 > From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE > To: groucho.64738 at hotmail.com > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NFS4 ACLs with samba 3 (or 4) > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > > I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where

Good morning, folks. I'm involved in a project to enforce NFSv4 ACL's across a variety of storage platforms, in particular NetApps sharing NFS. That works fiine with the NetApp NFS qtrees, but we'd like to share those with CIFS clients as well. This works, and restricts access the way we expect NFSv4 ACL's to work, but the Windows clients cannot view any of the security settings

Hi All, I'm having a bit of difficulty getting a CentOS 5.5 Kerberized NFSv4 server working. This server is configured as a Winbind client to a Windows 2003 Active Directory. I've successfully bound it to AD and I am able to authenticate. I've successfully created a NFSv4 entry in /etc/exports to export the /exports directory and I can successfully mount a non-Kerberized NFSv4

Hai Baptiste, I re-checked my setup and your totaly correct. I can not enter the nfsV4 mounted directory as root. What i've added in idmap.conf Is this : Domain = your_DNS_domain.tld [Translation] Method = nsswitch And i found this link. http://serverfault.com/questions/526762/root-access-to-kerberized-nfsv4-host-on-ubuntu im testing this now. Greetz, Louis >

Thanks you very much Louis ! I have tried your setup and I can't mount the share neither from the server itself or the client. On /var/log/syslog I have : rpc.gssd : ERROR : no credentials found for connecting to server myserver This is because the machine principal is not present in the keytab : $ klist -k 1 nfs/myclient.samdom.com at SAMDOM.COM 1 nfs/myclient.samdom.com at SAMDOM.COM 1

Hai Batiste, Ok, thanks for these, i'll test that also. And the "why" is a bit more explained here. http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/crossrealm/libnfsidmap_config.html and per example, http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/crossrealm/ldap_server_setup.html First my work here, but this is a good one which i also need to adjust in my scripts, so thank you for asking

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:38:57PM +0100, Christoph Kleineweber wrote: > > I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and > delegate > > access control completely to the underlying file system. > > > > My problem arises from the following scenario: Our file system

Hi *, We use nfs4 in combination with dovecot. Also (hard)quotas are used on the exports. Using the dovecot quota fs plugin things did not work at all. There were a few issues we encountered: 1. Nfs4 is not recognized. The problem is that the mount type is only checked for "nfs" and not nfs4. This was an easy fix. 2. The (fs)path for nfs4 that is relayed to rquotad has to be without

I have been trying all sorts of things to get this working. nfsv4 works fine if I just use the nfs-v3 form of export i.e. /nfs4exports 192.168.230.237/24(ro,fsid=0,sync,insecure,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,squash_uids=0-99) /nfs4exports/NDG 192.168.230.237/24(rw,insecure,no_subtree_check,nohide,sync,no_root_squash,squash_uids=0-99) but this is inherently open to all on this machine. so then

Looks like just starting the nfs service turns on V2, 3, and 4 (based on reading the script, reading the man pages, and looking at the ports using netstat -l). However, I can connect using -t nfs in the mount, and -t nfs4 fails. I don't believe this is a firewall issue, internal IPs are fully open to each other according to an early rule in iptables. $ sudo mount host03:/home/ddb /mnt/ddb

I'm trying to setup a simple NFSv4 mount between two x86_64 hosts. On the server, I have this in /etc/exports: /export $CLIENT(ro,fsid=0) /export/qb3 $CLIENT(rw,nohide) ON $CLIENT, I mount via: mount -t nfs4 $SERVER:/qb3 /usr/local/sge62/qb3 However: $ touch /usr/local/sge62/qb3/foo touch: cannot touch `/usr/local/sge62/qb3/foo': Read-only file system I'd really

Am 20.03.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Volker Lendecke: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 05:47:11PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> Well the API is propably just stuffing blobs into extended >>> attributes directly from userspace. That's how most of >>> the NFSv4 ACLs usually get done :-(. >>> >>> Of course all implementations use different blobs containing