similar to: CentOS or other Linux Internet Router/Gateway

Hi All, I'm lately suffering from Quota abuse at home. believe it or not my teenagers are eating through my allowed quota. Hence, i'm thinking of setting up a centos machine to work as such: HDSL modem(natted to an onboard dhcp service for lan users) -> Centos - > Switch - LAN users Hw specs: 3 GB ram 3.0 core 2 duo 2 X 1 TB HDD 2 X 1 Gb NIC Centos will contain the

Hi All, I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and I can host this in my garage. (Comcast offered me a 100 x 20 circuit for $99/mo with 5 statics) I used to run Untangle, but as of version 9, you are forced to use their build in protocol policies versus the firewalling I am used to (Deny All and then opening holes for specific IP's, etc). There are so many

Hi, Last week I finished installing a small network in a private school : one server (an old IBM X225), seventeen desktops (Fujitsu Siemens PIV 2.4 GHZ, 512 MB RAM, 40 GB HD), all running CentOS 5.5. One extra machine is acting as a router, in that it is installed between the DSL modem and the network, with two Ethernet cards, and it's taking care of DHCP, DNS, NTP and also acts like a

So, assuming your Asterisk box is behind one firewall (Linksys/Tomato Software) and your Wireless SIP phone is behind another firewall (SonicWall 1260 Enhanced). Is there anything special that I have to do to the firewalls. I do have the Asterisk firewall configured to work (ports 5060 & 10001-20000). But I'm not sure about the other end. Do I need STUN at the SIP Phone end? Do I

At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote: >James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > OS 6? > >> > >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument > >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. > > > > Maintenance. > > > > A consistent set of expectations does wonders for

On 06/29/2015 06:46 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Even considering a minimal CentOS install, is that still less minimal than > e.g. Smoothwall or Ipcop? Yes, a minimal install of CentOS is probably larger (less minimal) than a specialized distribution. > In my world, security has a price and, and that might be the need to learn > another distro in order to minimize security issues (and

>Message: 23 >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:11:59 -0400 >From: Dan Halbert <halbert at everyzing.com> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate & > config not found >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Message-ID: <469830EF.3080601 at everyzing.com> mailing-lists at computer2.com wrote: <snip>

Hello, First let me apologize for posting about a GUI topic on here. There's a reason why I did that, and it's because the underlying concept of this is connected to Asterisk.Here's my situation: Twenty wifi clients connecting to our wireless router (Cisco Linksys E4200 loaded with Tomato). All these WiFi clients are running eyeBeam (in case you're wondering where the calls come

Besides ranch networks and borderware, what other SIP aware firewalls for the SOHO/medium market exists? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama, Republica de Panama Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780 ------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I use CentOS as a firewall/proxy/webserver/fileserver in my small network. As the small-spec machine with CentOS is heavily loaded/used I can't afford downtime. 20 GB, pentium II with only 128 MB RAM. However I want to know the news on 4.5 is it due soon? Can I gain more by running CentOS 3.x range on such an old machine like mine? Will CentOS 5.0 mean you need a minimum of 512 RAM?

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o

On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: OS 6? > > Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument > behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. > Maintenance. A consistent set of expectations does wonders for debugging odd-ball occurrences. Why learn the idiosyncrasies of two distros when one suffices? Just start with a minimal CentOS install on

Hi Everyone, I am using pfSense to do firewall and NAT on an Asterisk server. I have ports 5060 TCP/UDP and 10k-20k UDP forwarded to the Asterisk server local IP 192.168.5.5. However, when a user from outside using Linksys WRP400 ata connects to the Asterisk server and registers I see them as 192.168.1.1 in the "sip show peers" command. In face, all many different of the Linksys WRP400

I have an Asterisk 1.4.2 system that has been installed for about 3 months now in our home. We converted all of our phones to SIP phones, and use two different trunk providers (BroadVoice for incoming & FlowRoute for outgoing). Most of the time its working flawlessly. But about 1/3rd of the calls that come into us complain of an echo and what is best described as latency issues. Its

I have purchased a used Compaq DL360 which I was going to use as a proxy server. Presently, we are using a cheap box with ipcop which is working fine but it didn't have much RAM (64MB), etc. This new box we will want to run squid and perhaps dansguardian for filtering (this is a non-profit company) and I'm wondering if I should just put ipcop on it or would it be smarter/better to install

On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 08:17 -0700, david wrote: > <snip> > > > >Yup. For, um, about a dozen years, I ran RH 7.1,7.2, 7.3, and eventually 9 > >on an old box that was nothing but a firewall router. I was seriously > >paranoid - no gcc or any development tools, no X, not much of anything. To > >the best of my knowledge, we never had a breakin. > > >

Greetings - I will be getting a new server for my company in the next few months and am trying to get a better understanding of some of the basic theoretical approaches to using Centos KVM on a server. I have found plenty of things to read that discuss how to install KVM on the host and how to install a guest and setup the network bridge, and all the other rudimentary tasks. But all of

Dear Lance, It is not work. Any idea? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Lance Fredrickson [mailto:lancethepants at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:53 AM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: Tinc Router Mode - PING RESULT is destination host unreachable On 2/16/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Yau wrote: > Hi Lars, > > Once I modify the firewall FORWARD rule to

Hi, I'm in the process of trying to convince my organization to move from an exchange server, to a samba solution, while retaining their original windows environments, including Outlook clients. I thought I had all my issues covered, and suddenly I'm facing a show stopper. it turns out that a lot of my users "documentation" has been stored on "public folders" on the

I'm finally biting the bullet, and replacing the 12-yr-old box that's been my firewall/router with an appliance. First, does anyone have any idea whether the WRT160 nl can use tomato? Second, is there any way, or any reason, I could/would want to run bastille against the firmware? mark