similar to: CentOS 4 Kernel Update

Hello all Does anybody knows about web based file sharing software? of course that runs on centos. i have found 3 proyects on sourceforge, but i would like to hear from you what do you use or what do you recommend?. Thank you in advance.

Hello all, Is 10 Gb supported by CentOS 4 and 5? Anyone using it? i'll appreciate any information on this subject. Thank you ?Todo sobre Amor y Sexo! La gu?a completa para tu vida en Mujer de Hoy. http://mx.mujer.yahoo.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

After upgrading to 4.7 x86_64 on all our boxes (from 4.6), we have 3 VMware Server 1.0.5 hosts that are unstable. Sometimes they spontaneously reboot, other times they freeze and require a hard reset. Under 4.6, they were rock solid. Failures tend to be associated with a guest start-up event, but are often at random times as well. There is no useful evidence in either the vmware or messages log

I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the repository. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html Is this something that is coming soon? Thanks!

Hello everybody, I've searched google for a while looking for a list of USB or PCI dialup modems supported by CentOS without success. Any information on this subject will be really appreciated. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081125/dd8598ed/attachment-0003.html>

Hello, I have installed a new server with centos 5.2 x86_64, when i try to install a guest using the gui tool virt-manager the "new" button is disabled, so no good luck. Using virt-install on the command line, the install process begins but after retrieving the .treeinfo vmlinuz and initrd.img files, it stop with the following error: virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST operation

Please, do not delay this "Important" multiple security update. See https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html for more info. This update is "5.3" kernel but has been released as security update too. RHN pushed this kernel one day ahead of rest of 5.3 packages (on my servers). RH maintains API and ABI (!) compatibility so there is no problem to use this kernel

entOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0394 kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0394.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.25.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-89.0.25.EL.x86_64.rpm

entOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0394 kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0394.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.25.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-89.0.25.EL.x86_64.rpm

I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) to the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and EL6 at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). EL7: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html EL5 and EL6: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html As stated above, I am currently

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:494-01 Updated ImageMagick packages fix security vulnerabilities This package contains a fix for RedHat bug #62100:ImageMagick does not start from Gnome menu panel. The release number has been updated to indicate that this package has been modified for CentOS-2. Files available:

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror RHSA-2004:174 Updated utempter package fixes vulnerability RHSA-2004:178 An updated LHA package fixes security vulnerabilities RHSA-2004:219 Updated tcpdump packages fix various vulnerabilities John. -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:18 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > My manager just told me that upstream has released a patched kernel for 7: > > CentOS package kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64.rpm > see http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2098.html > > I'm hoping Johnny can get us that, hopefully before the end of the week. > > mark > >

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 > > Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS > rebuilt and released it. > > What,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0294 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0294.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 212a275e48ec514d4861c2a3875dc9db349113c85c7a0ef2bc117433ed672c6a kernel-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.rpm

Hi! I'm trying to install my security updates for Centos 7 and i can't find this kernel. I looked at the following mirror in the updates directory. Am looking in the right place? CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2574 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2574.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:303-01 Important: sylpheed security update Files available: sylpheed-0.5.0-3.EL21.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update --

Hi, After switching to the 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64 kernel (CentOS 6) a few weeks ago I have noticed that my servers are now reporting a much higher idle load. The servers are being monitored with Zabbix, and there is a clear difference between the older kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1 and the newer 2.6.32-573.12.1. I can see the problem on both physical and virtual servers. You can see the Load

I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list of updates. We released a new glibc yesterday for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 .. it is VERY important that all users update to these versions: This update is rated as Critical by Red Hat, meaning that

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > attacks using ptrace. I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel (local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix. Ask