similar to: PPC questions

I need to get a wireless device for an upcoming trip (USB is preferable to PCMCIA for a long list of reasons) and I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with or recommendations for such items, particularly which ones work with Linux/CentOS. Right now I'm debating between a reasonably cheap Belkin 54G and a slightly more expensive Netgear 54G. Thanks. mhr

Can't connect to network even with no security. Is this possibly a firmware issue? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090401/7c80deca/attachment-0003.sig>

where can I find packages for hplip and it's deps for centos4x?

Where can I find gv for centos 5.x -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080912/706041b4/attachment-0002.sig>

Chris Mauritz wrote: > > The 32bit PPC release is for the older G3/G4 macs, no? I've got a > pile of unused G4 400-800mhz powermacs just sitting around The ppc32 distro will work on any NewWorld G3, G4 based machine ( and 32bit ibm power, like the older rs6k's ) - it _also_ works fine on the MacMini and G4 Xserve's. With some common sense tweaks, a G4 450Mhz is a very

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Jeremy Hoel <jthoel at gmail.com> wrote: > Besides the other linux distros mentioned, you have another more retro type > choice > > http://www.macworld.com/article/2363177/macs/turn-your-g4-era-mac-into-a-next-gen-amiga.html > You know, I do have a G4 mini somewhere... I do wonder if it also works under emulation (KVM AFAIK does support

Ops. I meant to say 3.1. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Manny Ko Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:27 AM To: Eli Bendersky Cc: Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the

I know the old JIT pretty well but have only used the MCJIT from the client side. Most of my experience is on the x86backend though. Another critical feature missing from MCJIT is the JITEventListener. This is usually for supporting debuggers and profiling tools. Ciao. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Albert

No. It adds a new event, 'NotifyObjectEmitted'. The Intel JIT listener that I mentioned then uses the emitted object to find the functions (which are all emitted together). Because of the way that MCJIT is implemented, it isn't really feasible to reconstruct things like the EmittedFunctionDetails in the NotifyFunctionEmitted event. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: Manny Ko

I see. If I am writing my own listener can I still get back the (llvm::Function, void* Code, size_t Size)? Ciao. -----Original Message----- From: Kaylor, Andrew [mailto:andrew.kaylor at intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:24 PM To: Manny Ko Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC No. It adds a new event,

The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine when a new object is emitted, but the profiling listeners do not do anything with the events (and I don't expect they will before the 3.2 release becomes official). I have implemented some code in trunk since the 3.2 branch to traverse the emitted object and pick out named functions in the IntelJITEventsListener. An

On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:10:56 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 15:51 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > - There is no support for generating position-independent code > > > > on PPC32. (PIC on PPC64 now works well). Nevertheless, I have > > > > sometimes run into linking errors when compiling shared > >

Besides the other linux distros mentioned, you have another more retro type choice http://www.macworld.com/article/2363177/macs/turn-your-g4-era-mac-into-a-next-gen-amiga.html On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:29 AM, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > Hello there, > > > complete off-topic, sorry about this, but my former idea was to install > a CentOS on an old mac mini (PPC!).

Thanks Andrew for the update. Does it support NotifyFunctionEmitted? Cheers. -----Original Message----- From: Kaylor, Andrew [mailto:andrew.kaylor at intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:06 PM To: Manny Ko Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine

This set of patches removes PPC/Altivec code from FLAC. I decided to split the patch into 5 parts to make it more simple: 1) removes FLAC__lpc_restore_signal_asm_ppc_altivec_16* from lpc.h and stream_decoder.c 2) removes PPC-specific code from cpu.c and cpu.h 3) removes PPC stuff from libFLAC/Makefile.lite and build/*.mk 4) removes as/gas/PPC-specific stuff from configure.ac and

Hello there, complete off-topic, sorry about this, but my former idea was to install a CentOS on an old mac mini (PPC!). Disappointed to see that PowerPC is not a supported architecture and that non ARM or Intel architecture are not managed by recent distros.. :-(. Searching the web, I see very few possibilities to install a recent (I need gnome2) GNU/Linux distro on such hardware. I gave Linux

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang > or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, > generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang > relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself > that is failing to initially interpret the string? If

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:43:30 +0700 <arkady-parabel@ngs.ru> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using a powerpc-based board (CPU - Motorolla 82855, 50 > Mhz) with 32 Mb of RAM, Big Endian. > Linux kernel - 2.4.22, bridge - statically linked & as a > module > brctl - 0.9.6 > Ethernet - fec (arch/ppc/8xx_io/fec.c) > All this was compiled with gcc version 3.2.2 20030217

The parts of klibc specific to the ppc architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit a82c9b6e9b3428bae592241d1ac276054bc46fc5 tree 70852f39dd495c9bffc307d38f6da673d91ab08a parent 078d6614054391efe17093f8d70340e2c0644ffb author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:37 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the version I have been using. If it is already implemented than it is very good news. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Eli Bendersky [mailto:eliben at google.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:25 AM To: Manny Ko Cc: Albert Graef; Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT