similar to: Resize all partitions bigger

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working

How do I get the keyboard layout selector in gdm login for 6.3? I have language selector but no keyboard layout selector. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 (for an alias ip) I just want to know if it's possible and reliable Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

> > It looks like Clonezilla and Ultimate Boot CD both prescribe > special installation procedures for USB stick. > isohybrids can be put onto stick just by e.g.: dd of=/dev/sdb > Make a backup of the stick if you later want to restore its > partitioning. > The (recent yet not latest) versions of Clonezilla that used Syslinux 5.xx will fail in some systems when writing

created 2 partitions on laptop (/ and swap) formatted them. mounted both source and target (under /mnt on each machine) rsync -a / from desktop -> laptop (Note: OS on desktop is on sdb5. On laptop it's going to sda1) Now I need to put grub on mbr of laptop boot: linux rescue chroot /mnt/sysimage Here is my problem grub-install /dev/sda The file /boot/grub/stage1 not read correctly. Can

> With respect to all of the actually important stuff however, I may have > missed it all, but I don't recall having read or seen an explanation of > what Ady & everybody else finally figured out about all this. What is > the answer, in the end? I did get the part about how (for my board, > at least) tweeking some of the info within the relevant MBR partition > table

> > In message <BLU0-SMTP1383C5798F6C577E5FFF368BA40 at phx.gbl>, > Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> With respect to all of the actually important stuff however, I may have > >> missed it all, but I don't recall having read or seen an explanation of > >> what Ady & everybody else finally figured out about all this... > >

Does anyone know if there is a Gnash rpm available for CentOS 4? I have tried compiling it myself but run into dependency problems. I looked here http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/gnash/ but there is only 0.8.2 for el5 not el4. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/ C++ GUI tutorial

> > Both sticks show very unusual factors for heads and sectors > > which are hardly intentional. If BIOS gets confused like fdisk, > > then the failure to find files is quite plausible. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Could you please exercise what is described for Linux in > >

Just noticed that our new server has a newer 80+ efficiency 865W PSU with PFC. So apparenty our existing 1500VA (865W) APC Back-UPS is not safe to use anymore. We apparently need a pure sine wave UPS. http://nam-en.apc.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/8883 I found an affordable 1500VA UPS by CyberPower, model CP1500PFCLCD, which has a pure sine wave output. Wondering if anyone has experience with

I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) provide dhcp and nfs services to an internal subnet via a dedicated switch. The other nic (eth0) connects to an external WAN switch to provide net access to the systems in the subnet. --- eth1 WAN switch eth0 --- | SUBNET switch --- eth2 Question: Is it

Running CentOS 6.3 Areca hardware raid 10 fdisk -l reports multiple partitions with the following description. "Partition # does not end on cylinder boundary." Disks are 512 byte sector size. Raid stripe size is 64K. but if I use fdisk -lc (-c Switch off DOS-compatible mode. ) I don't get any warnings. Should I reinstall? (performance hit?) -- Robert Arkiletian Eric

I just read the rhel6 filesystem size limit. http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/ It says 16TB limit for ext4 (same as ext3)?!?! I thought ext4 was supposed to support 1EB ( ~ 1 million TB) limit. That was one of the main advantages of rhel6. After a little more digging all I found was that the user space formatting tools (mkfs.ext4) only support 32bit filesystems (not 48bits). I'm surprised

Hi, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > what exactly did we determine that GA-M55Plus-S3G is failing > to support? It appears to be related to the choice of CHS addressing with the FAT filesystem. This opens the door for misperceived factors of heads per cylinder and sectors per heads. My current suspicion is that the partition end did not expose the effective factors in its end CHS address, so

I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a number of similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane howto on the subject. TLDP's "Hard disk upgrade howto" is embarrassingly antiquated: when's the last time you saw LILO? What's the recommended procedure for doing an HDD copy/upgrade from one disk to another? Is there a nice, detailed howto that

Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec. I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use the normal download though. Here's hoping... -- Bill

* Gene Cumm, 2014-06-10 : > If 4.05 or 3.86 acted nicely, this would mean a bug. OK, so, with unpatched official binaries: 3.86 ---- pxelinux.0 Loads fine, assumes terminal width 15, displays menu, but then freezes (I suspect it does not process any input from the serial port) gpxelinux.0 Displays: PXE->EB: !PXE at 9E64:0060, entry point at 9E64:00F6 UNDI code segment

Hallo, I'm just trying to boot a Clonezilla *.iso (live-20100521-lucid) via PXE; Label clonezilla kernel memdisk append iso raw initrd iso/clonezilla.iso The first step is ok - I see the boot menu of the *.iso. When I choose "Clonezilla live" the system fails with Isolinux: Disk error 02, AX = 4224, drive E0 when I choose "freedos" it fails with

Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in, is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would be detected by the raid 1 software. Thanks, Nataraj

Hi, I am currently using isolinux (syslinux-6.03) in a clonezilla setup. It boots fine, however I want to have a setup where the default boot selection alternates every boot. * First boot : Default is menu item 0 * Second boot : Default is menu item 1 * Third boot : Default is menu item 0 ... The idea is that when it is booted into clonezilla the clonezilla script checks if the system needs to