similar to: 5.4-->5.5 Upgrade broke OO 3.2.0

The last few releases of OpenOffice have gotten very unstable on my desktop which is a CentOS 5.5 i386 system. After multiple crashes when doing embedded simple drawings in OpenOffice writer (circles and lines with connections), I started using the versions from Sun then Oracle. I am now using version 3.3: openooffice.org3-3.3.0-9567. I've lived with this but with version 3.x it has gotten

I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1. When I used "yum remove openoffice.org-core" the response was "package openoffice.org-core available but not installed", but then, when I used "yum install openoffice.org-core there was a long list of Transaction Check Errors. I then removed openoffice.org3.1-redhat-menus-noarch which was in the errors. Here's the

I was just wondering if anyone here knows why the OO.org packages on RHEL/Centos are so huge. Eg. On Mandriva 2006: 40834529 OpenOffice.org 113064600 OpenOffice.org-libs 20124669 OpenOffice.org-help-en 19976941 OpenOffice.org-l10n-en = ~185MB On Centos 4: 683298379 openoffice.org-i18n 124072694 openoffice.org 111894560 openoffice.org-libs = ~876MB!! When I say 'installed by default' I

Sending my son back to college with a dual-boot laptop with Win 7 and CentOS 5.5. He uses Win7 to manage his iPod and SW that sometimes issued by a professor for a specific course...otherwise he uses CentOS for everything else. That setup worked well last year, except for printing. He has a low-end Cannon printer that is not supported in the Linux realm. Most of his coursework was uploaded to

I recently updated to OpenOffice 3.2 and I noticed that it, and the latest Evolution, seem to be incredibly slow for some operations. E.g., in OO, about half the time when I'm editing something, it takes anywhere from 10-30 seconds for OO to respond to a click on one of the icons or menu items, and Evo is taking forever to format messages. During these times the gnome-system-monitor icon on

Hi, Is there any way I can read a .docx file on my CentOS desktop ? Cheers, Niki

Hi, Being relatively new to OO programming and not so old on R, I noticed the possibility to do OO programming in R. But it seems there is two "paradigms" S3 that seems the old one but is the one used in the R.oo package and S4 which seems more recent As a starting point, which one is best to use? Is R.oo useful? what are the main difference between the two? Any feedback

It makes little sense to require the oVirt certificate, especially when the verification of the connection (-oo rhv-verifypeer) is disabled by default. The only work done with the certificate in that case is checking that it is a valid certificate file. Hence, make -oo rhv-cafile optional, requiring it only when -oo rhv-verifypeer is enabled. --- v2v/output_rhv_upload.ml | 16

On Thursday, 19 September 2019 13:16:01 CEST Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > >This way it is possible to override the UUIDs of the uploaded disks, > >instead of letting RHV generate them. > > > >This can be useful to force certain UUIDs, and to specify the disks in > >--no-copy mode (which now can be used).

This way it is possible to override the UUIDs of the uploaded disks, instead of letting RHV generate them. This can be useful to force certain UUIDs, and to specify the disks in --no-copy mode (which now can be used). --- v2v/output_rhv_upload.ml | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py | 2 ++ v2v/virt-v2v-output-rhv.pod | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files

Hi all, I'm trying to do some object-oriented programming in R using the R.oo package. Right from the start I encountered a strange (at least for me) problem. I define a new class/constructor based on the R.oo documentation. However the first attempt to create an object fails: === Code: === library(R.oo); setConstructorS3("MyClass",function(param) { print(param);

Can someone show me how to modify one (R.oo) class's object inside another (R.oo) class's method? Is that possible with the R.oo package? A quick example or reference to an example would be outstanding... Thanks, Ben [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R.oo package users, while testing some functionality of the R.oo, I found that during the first construction of a object from a class, the constructor is twice called, but only one object is finalized. In all subsequent creation processes, the constructor is (expectedly) called once. Here some example code: library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("Test_class",function(val) {

I got the following warnings when I install R.oo. Are these warnings normal? Should I reinstall the package as mentioned in the warnings? How to reinstall? The sessionInfo() is at the end. > install.packages("R.oo", dependencies=T) Warning in install.packages("R.oo", dependencies = T) : argument 'lib' is missing: using '/utility/R' also installing the

Hi to all members, i have a question about class inheritance and methods using R.oo package: I have the following code and it doesn't work, guess i'm doing smth wrong and there is nothing in the help. library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("ClassA", function(A=15) { extend(Object(), "ClassA", .size = A ); }) setMethodS3("print", "ClassA",

Hello, I see some people including myself confused by the different object-oriented approaches in R (S3, S4, OOP, R.oo etc.). Would it be ok to collect examples and solutions for the different OO-packages in one package and add a vignette for documentation? (assuming I find time for this task) I mean in this case the package would not add data or functionality to R or serve as a companion

Hello, Using the R.oo package, how do I throw an error if a field is not present when the user of the class creates the object? Using the example in the R.oo package: setConstructorS3("Person", function(name, age) { if (missing(name)) name <- NA; if (missing(age)) age <- NA; extend(Object(), "Person", .name=name, .age=age ) }) [rest of class methods

This is actually not required, because ovirtsdk4 will use the system's global trust store if necessary. Therefore we can make it optional in all cases. --- docs/virt-v2v-output-rhv.pod | 5 ++++- v2v/output_rhv_upload.ml | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/virt-v2v-output-rhv.pod b/docs/virt-v2v-output-rhv.pod index 04a894268..4520c9184 100644 ---

I would like to use R.oo and tcltk to implement a Turtle World. I have encountered many problems because: 1) I am not sure how to implement static fields with R.oo 2) I am not sure how to implement a constructor that would call a function only for the first instance of a class (i.e., to initialize value of static fields only once) 3) I am not sure how to remove/delete cleanly existing

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:34:48PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: >The validation helps us fail early and with a sensible error message. The NIL >UUID is not valid for oVirt, but other than that there is no other logic in >there merely because the UUID types are a matter of the generator and they are >just forwarded in this partucular case. > >Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander