similar to: bridge :: kernel panic

re can somebody tell me what am I doing wrong (at this late night hour), because vlan are not getting bridged at all. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 ifconfig br0 up vconfig add br0 X vconfig add br0 Y X = vlan-ID (example: 222) Y = vlan ID (example: 223) # brctl show bridge name bridge

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =

I am so out of my depth on this one, but I would welcome some help. I have the following network and did get it to work with m0n0wall (a BSD firewall) an option called "transparent bridge". I've switched to Clark Connect because of its support for content filtering, and installed bridge-utils. I have a home network based a single WAN-facing NIC, eth0, that gets a public IP address

hi i've setup the following on debian etch with bridge-utils 1.4 (backported) and kernel 2.6.26 from backports.org: vlan10 with raw device eth0 vlan20 with raw device eth0 br10 with initial port vlan10 br20 with initial port vlan20 i've set hw addr to DE:AD:BE:EF:34:10 for br10 and DE:AD:BE:EF:34:20 for br20 the bridges are used to connect virtual machine nic's. "brctl

Hi, I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth5 brctl stp br0 on I check on my system's /var/log/syslog file. It shows something strange messages as below: - Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes)

Hi, I'm using linux 2.6.21.5 and our kernel is freeze. The problem is, if I create a Software bridge using $brctl command. and add two interfaces say, eth0.0 and eth0.1 using $brctl addbr br-lan $brctl addif br-lan eth0.0 $brctl addif br-lan eth0.1 and when i send traffic from a host connected to one port to host connected at other end, soon all the memory is dried up and and kernel

Hi I intent to use brctl to bridge two devices on linux box. One is eth0, the other is USB net which is recognized as usb0 by linux box. Then I run following command # ifconfig eth0 down # ifconfig usb0 down # brctt addbr ipbr # brctl addif ipbr eth0 # brctl addif ipbr usb0 # ifconfig eth0 up # ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 # ifconfig usb0 up # ifconfig usb0 0.0.0.0 # ifconfig ipv6 up

I've got a 2.6.8 kernel with bridging enabled as a module, two nics (LNE100TX and RTL8139) and i've run the following commands with no errors modprobe -v bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 both interfaces have 0.0.0.0 as their addresses and brctl showmacs br0 shows the macs for both internal cards. However, bridging doesn't seem to be working at all.

Hi there, I'm currently experiencing a minor problem using the bridge module under kernel 2.4.27 part of the Devil Linux distribution (http://www.devil-linux.org). The problem I am having is that when the bridge is unloaded during a reboot I receive the following errors in /var/log/messages: Nov 14 13:22:13 src@Devil kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =

Hi, I am a beginner of bridge. I have a problem of using Fedora Core 2 to make a simple bridge. Here is my setup: The bridge computer is installed with Fedore Core 2 (with the SE Linux patch). As I know that kernel 2.6.5 is already support bridging by default, so I didn't recompile the kernel. Then I installed bridge-utils-0.9.6-1.i386. And no additional configuration is made. After

Hi, I added below code in /etc/rc.d/rc.local in order to load the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 ifconfig br0 up but it fail, i found error in /var/log/message said localhost: modprobe: modprobe cannot locate br0 modules but i found it said suceedly up the br0 interface anyone know? ===== Ô¸ÄúÓÀÔ¶ÐÒ¸££¬¿ìÀֺͰ²Ïê Happy & Healthy Always ! ^_^ !

[desktop] ----- lan ----eth0 [notebook] eth1 192.168.?.? ` ----- wlan ---- [speedport(hub and router)] -- internet 192.168.2.x So on my laptop I have eth0 beeing lan, eth1 beeing wlan ethernet card. When only using eth0/1 everything is fine. Now I want to be able to use internet from both [desktop] and [notebook]. Typically you set up a bridge with

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hi I have been using Shorewall for a while now and find it very useful and easy to configure, I am learning iptables and having trouble getting the bridge to successfully work with squid, although I get it working with Shorewall straight away? Does anyone know the rules to successfully use squid with a transparent bridge? Internet – router - (bridge eth0 – eth1) – local lan auto lo iface lo

Hi, This may sound crazy but I will go ahead anyway. Here's my scenario: ifconfig bond0 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ifenslave bond0 eth0 ifenslave bond0 eth1 brctl addbr stp0 brctl addif stp0 bond0 brctl stp stp0 on Is this a valid scenario? I am trying to bond two interfaces and run STP over the bonded interface..The problem I am trying to solve is to run STP over aggregated links

Hi there, I'm trying to set up a man-in-the-middle scenario within a VMWare Workstation team, using brctl. What I want is the following: PC1 eth0 >---LAN-segment-1---< eth0 PCMITM eth1 >---LAN-segment-2---< eth0 PC2 Now I did the following on PCMITM (PC man in the middle): ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth1 down brctl addbr lnxbr0 brctl addif lnxbr0 eth0 brctl addif lnxbr0 eth1

dear all: I try to configure a bridge in my embedded linux. I had fininshed these operations below: 1) configure kernel, select the option "802.1d bridge" 2) compile bridge-utils 3) issue these commands: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr vb brctl addif vb eth0 brctl addif vb eth1 ifconfig vb 192.168.110.24 up

Hello You must add first: vlan (tagged) to eth2 eth2 interface is not tagged by default and not know vlan-s . It is like a cisco if you have 24 ports in cisco by default all ports are in vlan1. if you want to do trunk (with vlans) you myst add (vlans) to this ports (tagged or untagged) So you can compare that all interfaces in linux by default are in one vlan(but not tagged). (only for

I've been playing around with qemu and wanted to make the guest OS instance visible on my network. This meant getting bridging and tun/tap working. After getting things working by pasting command from the CentOS wiki article plus adding a few enhancements, I decided to capture the process in a shell script that would be suitable for a user in the sudoers file to fire off. Not sure why