similar to: Mock Shell Arch Command

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Mock Shell Arch Command"

2013 Jul 18
1
Gluster & PHP - stat problem?
Has anyone ever ran into a problem in which PHP's stat() call to a file on a Gluster-backed volume randomly fails, yet /usr/bin/stat never fails? Running strace against both reveals that the underlying system calls succeed. I realize this is probably a PHP problem since I cannot replicate with a non-PHP-based script; however, was hoping someone on this list might have seen this before. RHEL
2015 Mar 10
4
Glibc sources?
> Okay, thanks. I really don't need _EXACT_ match, but close. Again, my > aim is to equip GlibC with some logging facilities IF anyone is using the > gethostbyname(). Given the help from this list, I was able to rebuild > GlibC for CentOS and am testing my stuff now. > > I appreciate your help on this matter. Not knowing where the knobs are was > the hardest part. I
2015 Aug 27
1
[PATCH] customize: Use setarch when running commands on i686 guest (RHBZ#1256405).
When running (eg) dnf on a 32 bit i686 guest when the host is 64 bit x86_64, dnf believes it is running on a 64 bit machine and so tries to install x86_64 packages. We can 'trick' dnf into believing it's a 32 bit machine using the setarch program. $ virt-builder fedora-22 --arch i686 --install 'gperf' ... [ 27.4] Installing packages: gperf ... Running transaction test Error:
2015 Mar 11
2
Glibc sources?
> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 6:02 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources? > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:47 PM, ANDY KENNEDY <ANDY.KENNEDY at adtran.com> wrote: > >> > > How do I tell rpmbuild to
2015 Aug 27
1
[PATCH v2] customize: Use setarch when running commands on i686 guest
v2: Fix problem when running multiple commands.
2015 Aug 31
1
[PATCH] customize: fix running commands on the same architecture
Wrap the command around an heredoc only if setarch needs to be used; otherwise the heredoc will not be run at all. Fix commit d875346ad441d4762455ea1b41d57ad6174d9b63. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml b/customize/customize_run.ml index 2283272..9d97522 100644 ---
2015 Mar 02
2
Glibc sources?
On 03/02/2015 11:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: >>>> I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with >>>> gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for >>>> the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I
2012 Jun 27
2
unixODBC Centos 5 Testing version
Trying to get a later version of the unixODBC RPM that is in Centos 5, I read in some posting that unixODBC.x86_64 2.2.12-1.el5s2 was in the testing repo but I was unable to locate it, currently it appears that we are runningunixODBC-2.2.11-7.1. I have looked in the Centos 5 Testing repo but do not see the 2.2.12 version....anyone have any pointers to move me along, thanks.
2011 Dec 09
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add the disable_aslr option that will disable the address space layout randomization under AddressSanitizer on 10.6
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. > > Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? > > On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". > > > > You asked about link time. Now it sounds like you're talking
2004 Aug 22
2
permissions, kernel-2.6.8, and wine-20040813
Hi, Yesterday I upgraded to kernel 2.6.8 on my Fedora Core 2 system. This caused a problem with the version of wine I'd been using (20040505), so I upgraded wine to the current version (20040813). The remaining problem is as follows: I'm calling wine like this: wine start.exe vcbuild.bat and vcbuild.bat contains the following: set QMAKESPEC=win32-msvc.net set
2006 Nov 27
3
gcc -m32 on a x86_64 box
Gents, I am trying to do a "gcc -m32" on a x86_64 box. gcc -m32 /tmp/jj.c /usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status This is the error I get. I did a "yum install glib.i386" successfully. there is no "yum install glib-devel.i386". How can i get a "gcc -m32" compile on my x86_64? THanks, Jerry
2008 Dec 12
1
Information about ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization) in CentOS 5
Hi, We are porting some applications from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, the applications use mmap, and we found out that they sometimes crash in CentOS 5. We found out that this is due to the fact that CentOS 5 does randomization of the address space when loading binaries, libraries, and when using mmap, so that is what's causing our problem. The thing is, I'm trying to google for it, but I did
2006 Apr 08
1
text_field behaviour with validations
Hi, The text_field method sets the class of the field to "invalid" when the object you specified is invalid (when using validations). This is to facilitate working with validations. Is there anything else it does? In a certain non-standard situation I''m forced to use text_field_tag, instead of text_field. This means I have to take care of the validations myself as well.
2011 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add the disable_aslr option that will disable the address space layout randomization under AddressSanitizer on 10.6
Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". Another question: if asan would require -no_pie on Mac, will this be a serious limitation? Thanks, --kcc On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote: > Options when creating a main executable > -pie This
2011 Dec 09
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add the disable_aslr option that will disable the address space layout randomization under AddressSanitizer on 10.6
On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. > > Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? > > On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". > >
2011 Dec 09
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add the disable_aslr option that will disable the address space layout randomization under AddressSanitizer on 10.6
On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. > Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? > On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". > You asked about link time. Now it sounds like you're talking about runtime? > Another question: if asan would require -no_pie on Mac, will this be a serious limitation? > If asan
2015 Mar 09
6
Centos 6 - disabling IPv6 addressing
Sorry - that should be sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0 to disable that, not 1. Chris On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Chris Stone <axisml at gmail.com> wrote: > Try: > > sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=1 > > to persist between boots, be sure to add this to your /etc/sysctl.conf > file. > > This should prevent the box from listening to any RA
2011 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add the disable_aslr option that will disable the address space layout randomization under AddressSanitizer on 10.6
On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> Link time is of course better. >> But if there is a syscall (like the one used by setarch) we could call it >> and reexec. >> Using setenv("DYLD_NO_PIE")+reexec looks gross to me. > There's posix_spawnattr_setflags() that can do the job >
2020 May 04
1
[common PATCH] mltools: add run_in_guest_command helper
Add an helper function to run a command in the guest, checking for the host/guest compatibility. This is mostly extracted from the internal do_run helper currently in the Customize_run module of virt-customize. --- mltools/tools_utils.ml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mltools/tools_utils.mli | 10 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) diff --git a/mltools/tools_utils.ml
2005 Sep 12
2
x86_64 Question
Hello All, It's time for my stupid question of the year. I just swapped over to an Athlon64 proc. I went to compile a src rpm and it bombs out. Now, rather than have anyone troubleshoot this and add noise to the list, I'm fairly certain what it's been answered before by someone. I tried google and never did see a true answer. what I do see is stuff about mozilla mostly and