similar to: IPV6 and DNS...

Hi Bob, ? Ok, things are looking ok again? dpkg-reconfiure krb5.conf , doesnt do much expect installing and configuringing krb5.conf which basicly only sets the REALM.? "init administrator" will not connect to kerberos? If the DNS isnt running, its unable to resolv the servernames for the REALM. Resulting in, you not able to kinit. ? Greetz, ? Louis ? ? Van: Robert Wooden

Rowland, To answer you first, my "example.com" registered host is a wildcat " *. example.com". Everything example.com returns my external ip address. Both bind9 and samba are running. Might add your "options" but for now, solving my problem, first. Louis, your answer in a few minutes. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at

Bind_DLZ is not loaded Which makes sence if we see the errors.. Verify if this is loaded.. I have it in named.conf.local // adding the dlopen ( Bind DLZ ) module for samba, beware, if you using bind9.9 then you need to change this manualy include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

hi Guys, As we get ready to start publishing Cloud Images ( or rather images consumable in various virt platforms, including public and private clouds ) - it would be great to have a baseline package manifest worked out. What / how many images should we build. At this time we were thinking of doing : - CentOS-5 32bit minimal - CentOS-6 32bit minimal - CentOS-5 64bit minimal - CentOS-6 64bit

I have a Centos server that is running BIND and has IPv6 global addresses. I have entered a number of AAAA records into this copy of BIND in a local view and zone (tld is htt). Over IPv4, I have no trouble with nslookup ('nslookup - 127.0.0.1' and 'nslookup - 192.168.128.55'). I get the AAAA records back. But if I try to use the IPv6 address of the system I get a time out.

I must have something mis-configured in my bond setup. Things are working, but I'm getting TONS of this sort of stuff in my log: +2001:502:ad09::4#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/A/IN': +2001:503:231d::2:30#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/A/IN': +2001:503:a83e::2:30#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Looking at what my best options for managing KVM via a gui. Running Centos 5.4 and have several machines and want to migrate off of vmware server 2.x. So far it appears that the management tools haven't quite cought up to Vmware but are gaining and closing. I have been looking at convirt, and others. I like what I see in Ovirt but I'm not sure it is available for centos 5.4, or is it?

Hi All, I see that sparc.centos.org does not contain any ISO's so that I can install from CD. How does one install over the internet? I have never done it before. I assume use the boot.iso and make sure that I have DHCP turned on so that I get an IP automatically from my router? Any advice? -Jason

On 29/02/2020 19:01, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > No and I can see why you asked, I will update the page. > > It is supposed to update all the records found in a file called dns_update_list, which on Debian, is to be found here: > > /var/lib/samba/private/dns_update_list > Thanks Rowland. Is it possible to add some feature requests for extra options for samba_dnsupdate

Hi there, Domaincontroller name: risky.home.schinz.de dig dig @risky -tANY risky.home.schinz.de. returns: ;; ANSWER SECTION: risky.home.schinz.de. 900 IN A 10.0.180.254 risky.home.schinz.de. 900 IN AAAA ::1 I have a strange behavior in my network. It's only concerning DNS, but maybe someone can help me. If a do a ssh on risky from another machine (exact command:

Hey, maybe lynx package should be a requirement of the whois package...? ? $ whois ubiquity.io ? [Querying http://www.io.io/cgi-bin/whois] ? [HTTP: Unable to run web browser: /usr/bin/lynx: No such file or directory] Thx, JD

Hi, We have outdated SOA information in our samba DNS. We used to have a DC1, and it is no more, however it's listed in our SOA records on both remaining DC's. I think this is not correct. I am under the impression that in order to get full failover support, all DC's need to have listed themselves as SOA. This is also what google tells me:

Hello, I am doing some tests with asterisk on a dual-stack environment. I have some doubts regarding asterisk binding addresses on a server with 2 network cards. According to asterisk documentation: /; With the current situation, you can do one of four things:/ /; a) Listen on a specific IPv4 address. Example: bindaddr=192.0.2.1/ /; b) Listen on a specific IPv6 address.

im on phone, had a quick small look at the dc3 output. is your time in sync, it looks like a 3 - 10 min different. gr. Louis Op 7 mei 2019, om 18:34, Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> schreef: Hello, dc3: http://pasted.co/6b703479 dc4: http://pasted.co/5068fc6e diff: http://pasted.co/025c3242 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:08 PM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at

On 02/03/2020 13:36, Paul Littlefield wrote: > On 02/03/2020 13:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> Samba runs samba_dnsupgrade on a regular basis, using dns_update_list >> as a template. Amongst the list of dns entries is this: >> >> AAAA ${HOSTNAME}?????????????????????????????????????????? $IP >> > > Hi Rowland, > > Can I change any of

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

On Fri, Jan 24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > However I don't understand why disabling IPv6 should be necessary. If > sites resolve to AAAA+A records, then presumably it's going to choose > the A (IPv4) route since no IPv6 route exists. If a site resolves to > only an AAAA record, then it's not reachable whatever we do. For me the code tries to reach the ipv6 address,

Hello! I am having a strange issue with CentOS 5.4 that I cannot seem to solve. Every DNS lookup results in AAAA records being requested first before A records. As a result, this causes a large amount of unnecessary DNS traffic on the network. IPv6 has been completely disabled on these servers: /etc/modprobe.conf, ipv6 off and net-pf-10 off /etc/sysconfig/network, NETWORKING_IPV6=no lsmod |