similar to: iptables info in proc - ttl

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=562 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-04-27 02:41 MET ------- I asked you to post this with additional information to the mailinglists, so pleast at least include the information here or post it to the lists as I asked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -------

I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were provided even when I ran restore with the -v option. I determined that none of my backed up configuration files going back to October will load either. This is more than passing strange because I altered and uploaded the iptables configuration on this host several

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 Summary: Rsync 3.1 dev : Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: dochitoai.vu at ladhyx.polytechnique.fr

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Netscape 4.73 available Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:028-02 Issue date: 2000-05-19 Updated on: 2000-05-19 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: netscape SSL telnet rlogin Cross references:

This is for Rails 3.1.1 I have a field called last_seen in a model. This field will be updated when the something about the record is seen in the real world (don''t worry about this part) So I go x.update_attribute(:last_seen, Time.now) and the following happens is UPDATE "blah" SET "last_seen" = ''2012-10-23 08:57:46.179288'', "updated_at"

> So what addIntervalsToSpills returns are new intervals to allocate with > infinite weights, right? > And I need not to allocate the old interval. Should hasStackSlot return true > on its register then? > I am not very sure about addIntervalsToSpill, but, for all the registers created to replace a spilled registers, they must have a stack slot assigned to them. I am sending you my

The current build of iptables does not appear to include some modules. Among these are ipt_recent.so, a very handy module in deflecting the current flurry of sshd dictionary attacks. Lineox appears to have the same problem. This is because the RedHat source rpm spec file is not explicit in the kernel directory location and that omission affects these few modules. Required changes in the

Hello, all. I read this document about iptables recent module. http://blog.andrew.net.au/2005/02/16#ipt_recent_and_ssh_attacks and I would like to filter the excessive spam mail sending ip address by iptables recent module. and some questions. iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -m state --state NEW -m recent --set --name SPAM iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -m state --state NEW -m

I''m feeling a bit dense and am having a hard time grasping the best way to implement simple search in Rails. Basically, I just want an input textbox where a user can type a query which then checks records in the database ... extremely simple. I already wrote a little ''search'' action in my controller, however I''m trying to stick with the whole Rails

I'm not sure about one thing: you assign stack slot to each new register you replace the spilled one with. And then you need to allocate physical registers to them. Is it possible to assign physical register to the virtual one which has a stack slot already? On 8/21/06, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira <fernando at cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > > > So what addIntervalsToSpills

Hi, i have a problem with xen. the output of uname is:Linux xen 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 #9 SMP Mon Jan 23 18:13:25 CET 2006 i686 AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 844 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux i user the SAME config of the kernel, for xen0 domain, and when i boot with xen0 kernel it reboots after this output... . . . ipt_recent v0.3.1: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>.

I''m trying to setup Shorewall 2.0.8 with the one-interface settings on my LFS (kernel 2.6.5) system. I''ve read the troubleshooting guide, recompiled my kernel with just about every netfilter/iptables module I could find, but I''m still getting this error: # tail /tmp/trace + prefix=Shorewall:smurfs:DROP: + ''['' 22 -gt 29 '']'' +

Is the maximum permitted value for --hitcount documented anywhere? I reliably get a iptables-restore error when I specify a hitcount value greater than 20 but I cannot find any mention of there being a maximum value. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited

Hi folks, Yesterday I raised an issue about inconsistent preservation of whitespace<http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/Tickets/000087>in Python-Markdown. >>> import markdown >>> md = markdown.Markdown() >>> md.convert('Added `>>> ` to signify user input.') u'<p>Added

This is a port of a patch I contributed to ssh 1.2.23 in May 1998. I have missed the functionality after moving to OpenSSH so I have updated the patch and hope OpenSSH might accept it. The patch allows sshd_config to have lines like: AllowUsers root at localhost AllowUsers tridge@* AllowUsers guest at 192.168.2.* DenyUsers badguy@* etc. I found this useful for restricting users to only login

I noticed when Samba initially created a NS it gave it a ttl=900. If I delete this record from my zone and create a new one. It gives the NS a ttl=0. Attempting to set using Microsoft DNS tools does not take. Can this be done any other way? Using samba-tool? Thanks. Name=, Records=6, Children=0 SOA: serial=481, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=0,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169 Bug ID: 1169 Summary: Bug in altering IP TTL field of a packet? Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi folks, i've a question about the ttl, which my wins hook script gets from smbd4wins: I record many entries with extrem high ttls like refresh $SERVER 20 1181977528 $IPADDRS... the ttl of 1181977528 means ~13.000 days which is very long. if i look into the ldb itself, there's an expiry time of ~ 24days (16.06.2007). ---- dn: name=$SERVER,type=0x20 [...] expireTime:

Hi! I can''t find anywhere correct syntax how to match TTL. All of I found refuse to work :( tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 match u8 64 0xff at 8 flowid 1:11 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 match u8 0x10 0xff at nexthdr+13 protocol tcp flowid 1:11 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 match u8 0x10 0xff at nexthdr+13 flowid 1:11 All I need is to

Hello. I read in an old announcement by Ezra, relating to the older version of BackgrounDRb, about workers being able to clean up after themselves and a TTL feature. I''m not sure if these things are present in the newer version. I''ve tried overriding the delete method in my worker but when I call delete_worker, the method doesn''t appear to be called. Is there a right