similar to: Performance problems with XFS on Centos 5.4

Before I'd try to defragment my whole filesystem (see attached mail for whole story) I figured "Let's try it on some file". So I did > xfs_bmap /raid/Temp/someDiskimage.iso [output shows 101 extents and 1 hole] Then I defragmented the file > xfs_fsr /raid/Temp/someDiskimage.iso extents before:101 after:3 DONE > xfs_bmap /raid/Temp/someDiskimage.iso [output shows 3

Judging from the frequency of my messages here one could think that I'm too stupid to upgrade a workstation to 5.2 (but the servers I've tried work without problem) OK. The problem: I've tried to upgrade a 5.1-x86_64-workstation to 5.2. During the upgrade immidiatly after (according to the /var/log/messages) upgrading the two (64 & 32-bit) libgcc-packages an EXT3-error occurs and

Add a new api xfs_repair for repairing an XFS filesystem. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/xfs.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml | 23 ++++++++ gobject/Makefile.inc | 6 ++- po/POTFILES | 1 + src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 5 files changed, 145

Hi! I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the /home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use the kmod-xfs from extras. It works great ;) Now: as I understand it from the release-notes the 5.4 kernel has XFS already built-in. Right? Or is it just a kmod-package ("technology preview") Now my question is: are there any recommendations for an upgrade-procedure? I

Hi! I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it. One of the "problems" with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my experience with our current fileserver is that a 0.5TB ext3 filesystem needs approx half an hour to complete (and kicks in

Hi! I have the following problem: I have a server (CentOS 5.3 x86_64) on which I want to install a virtual Xen-machine (CentOS 5.3 x86_64), I ssh from my workstation (Centos 5.3 x86_64 .... do you see the pattern ;) ) to that server and start the virt-manager. I create a new Guest (Paravirtualiuzed) and point it to the server with the installation files (CentOS 5.3, but I already said that). The

Hi! When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real "yum upgrade" doesn't have to download the packages) yum upgrade --upgradeonly it fails with these messages: Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package evolution Error: Missing Dependency: libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15 is needed by package evolution Error: Missing Dependency:

I know this is quite a handwaving, stupid question, but I don't know where else to ask it and maybe somebody here can at least point me into the right direction, because I'm stuck. I have a program package that were using here (OpenFOAM for those who know it). My problem is that when I compile and link this package on CentOS 5, it won't run on CentOS 4.x-machines but stops with a

Hi! I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I thought I might mention it here. I have a machine with a NVidia-card and because of the ease of use I use the rpmforge-package for that. After upgrading the problem was that during rebooting as soon as the machine hit the RHGB (which implicitly uses that driver) the machine froze. I booted into the old kernel removed rhgb,

Hi! I want to test some software on my CentOS 5 machine that is not too happy with the system python (2.4). So when I install a python to my machines I want it to be a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM b) safe: it should not remove the system-python (in order not to break the system-scripts in subtle ways) but be accessible for instance as python2.6 (while python would still be

Hi! Some weeks ago the "Running Xen"-book was recommended to me on this list. A nice book, but it gave me crazy idea: One of the recommendations (which sounds very reasonable to me) was to have instead of a single file that serves as a disk-image to have to files: one of them (which is mounted to hda1) serves as a partition that holds the data, the other one (which mounts to hda2) is

more daemon codes covered Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/debug.c | 2 +- daemon/devsparts.c | 2 +- daemon/guestfsd.c | 6 +++--- daemon/labels.c | 4 ++-- daemon/ldm.c | 16 ++++++++-------- daemon/md.c | 10 +++++----- daemon/mkfs.c | 2 +- daemon/parted.c | 8 ++++---- daemon/statvfs.c | 8 ++++---- daemon/sync.c

Hi Daniel, Thanks for your immidiate reply. The starting of virtual guest was ok on our machine. We are facing this issue while executing the "cpu-stats <domain name>" command. I have collected the debug logs as you suggested and attaching the same. <<libvirt_testing_starting_VG.log >> --> Log collected while starting the virtual guest

Hello, After searching the archives, I''ve found only two messages regarding this case, but there were no solution. I have a similar problem, so I try to ask here. I have twi HFC chipset ISDN cards in my pc: 0000:00:0d.0 Network controller: Cologne Chip Designs GmbH ISDN network controller [HFC-PCI] (rev 02) Subsystem: Cologne Chip Designs GmbH ISDN Board Flags: bus

Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for providing us your pointers. From the domain.xml(attached in my previous mail) which we have used for defining virtual guest i can see below lines <emulator>/usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator> We were using same domain.xml in eralier libvirt version and the execution of cpu_stats command was successful. Now if we have to get "cpu_stats"

I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/ is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin is not installed for the new firefox (After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink it works all right)

Hi! I've got a CentOS4.7-machine as a fileserver. The machine also serves as the LDAP-server against which all regular users are authenticated. The problem I am having is that the machine takes a very long time to boot. Most of the services start up rather quick, but three services take quite a long time (extending the boot time to over half an hour, which is .... long) The three services

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86650 Bug ID: 86650 Summary: (NV44): initrd gpu lockup from 3.12 or 3.13 onwards Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:

Hello Everyone, I gotta problem that effects 2 of my products. I was wandering if I could get your take on it. Basically, I have 2 parallel effects. First Effect makes things disappear new Effect.Parallel( [ new Effect.Fade(oTab.panel, {duration: 1}), new Effect.Fade(contentId, {duration:1}), new Effect.SlideUp(this.panelContainer, {duration:1}) ], {queue:{position: end, scope:

Hi! I'm using CentOS 5.1 (x86_64) machines which authenticate using LDAP. At the start of booting I get messages like this: udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://ldap.server.example.com/: Can't contact LDAP server udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server... udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) - Can't contact LDAP