similar to: [Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

sending mail to samba-unsubscribe@us5.samba.org is looping/bouncing ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medi Montaseri medi@CyberShell.com Unix Distributed Systems Engineer HTTP://www.CyberShell.com CyberShell Engineering ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded

It looks like my message yesterday to the new mail server did not go through, so I am sending this to the list again. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at mail.centos.org> Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:48 PM Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: lmmailinglists at gmail.com This is the mail system at host mail.centos.org. I'm

> On 17 March 2019 13:14 Marek Kozlowski via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > :-) > > I'm using postfix for mail delivery and dovecot for mailbox access imaps > pop3s. > > Postfix resolves, verifies and overwrites users' addresses by numerous > subtle LDAP queries. However users are visible as local ones (openldap, > pam, nss) in

This is a MIME-encapsulated message. --2F52F7EF1.1054526569/l3lx216.univ-lille3.fr Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain This is the Postfix program at host l3lx216.univ-lille3.fr. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do

:-) I'm using postfix for mail delivery and dovecot for mailbox access imaps pop3s. Postfix resolves, verifies and overwrites users' addresses by numerous subtle LDAP queries. However users are visible as local ones (openldap, pam, nss) in the sense I can run `id' or `finger' queries and receive replies. Dovecot handles all mailboxes over imap/pop correctly with no

(A) I received the following bounced message when I tried to submit a bug from http://bugs.r-project.org/cgi-bin/R (B) The bug report itself is at the bottom. Thanks, Chris (A) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:08:02 +0200 (CEST) From: MAILER-DAEMON at pubhealth.ku.dk (Mail Delivery System) To: candrews at buffalo.edu

This is the SMTP Server program at host orange.fr. I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It''s attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The SMTP Server

This is the mail system at host mail1.ardenthealth.com. I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It''s attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail

by the way, how come the list got another "mail delivery system" email whenever i sent a post?...weird... On 8/30/06, Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn> wrote: > This is the Postfix program at host mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn. > > I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients.

Dunno, your email provider doesn't want to talk to me, heh, screw them :) They claim i'm on an rbl, no rbl checks verify this. Even tried to submit a request using their website, but it's broken and doesn't work (http://postmaster.ausics.net/pmg.php) ----- Forwarded message from patrickdk at patrickdk.com ----- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:31:37 -0400 From: Patrick

On 4/20/2018 8:53 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >> >> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C >> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. >> It is not a

I have a subroutine to block spammer by CALLERID(number) exten => 4,1,GotoIf(${BLACKLIST()}?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,Set(goaway=${CALLERID(number):0:2}) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V4" ]?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V3" ]?blacklisted,s,1) but I just got another spammer (automated calls) who rotates his

Hi, Some people have suggested maintaining black lists and white lists to avoid spammers and allow legitimate callers into the network. However, the problem with this method is that the spammer's IP address might change due to DHCP. Today a spammer might get aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and lets say that I put this address in my blacklist. To my annoyance, tomorrow a legitimate caller might get

Hi list. I'm using dovecot as postfix's LDA. The version is 2.3.6. Last week some spammer set the envelope's FROM to "foo at bar@domain.com" (with two @). While trying to deliver (as this one didn't hit the spamassassin's score), dovecot said the following: Jun 21 02:35:58 mymailserver postfix/pipe[29736]: ADA268195E: to=<user at mydomain>, relay=dovecot,

Hello, I have a question about postfix. I have a few webservers, each with their own mailing system. Obviously manually adding items can be quite tedious going from one to another to another. I am in the process of making a list of domains (commercial spammers) that bother me. My idea is to use the access file to reject them. My question is this... Can I make a text page on one of my html

I've mentioned this before but only heard from one other person who has experienced this, but it's becoming a pretty serious issue. The situation: A spammer sets a bot on a fishing attempt to gain email addresses, causing numerous login processes to spawn and suck up all available resources. The problem: Obviously this can act like a dos attack, but the real issue is after the

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: multipart/report Size: 1191 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20050708/0b390ebc/attachment.bin

An email that you sent to g.drummond@napier.ac.ukwith the subject title: Re: List has been blocked because it appears to contain a Virus/Worm. Please note : the recipient has been notified that your email has been blocked. In order to protect our systems the email has been deleted. Please clean and resend the email C&IT Services Napier University MailMarshal Rule: Anti-Virus (Inbound) : Block

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = mailer-daemon@inetforce.com.ua Subject = MAIL TRANSACTION FAILED Message-ID = i0RDVRlh033718 Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768 Dr.Web detailed

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@lists.samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = marketing@microstar.ru Subject = hi Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768 Dr.Web detailed report: