similar to: aide updated packages

I upgraded my box from 5.3 to 5.4. When running "aide --update", I'm getting this warning message on /var/log/messages "aide: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application" Below is the aide version installed: aide -v Aide 0.13.1 Compiled with the following options: WITH_MMAP WITH_POSIX_ACL WITH_SELINUX WITH_XATTR WITH_LSTAT64 WITH_READDIR64

hi smbusers, would like to ask some questions about posix acls and reiserfs.help and info is much appreciated.(to make it clear i am running mandriva 2007 free edition with samba 3.0.23d installed.) 1. is acl supported now on reiserfs filesystems by default? 2. do i have to recompile the kernel and apply the acl patch? (i currently have the 2.6.17 kernel) 3.which is best for samba?xfs?ext3? or

Hi all, I have just installed Xen on my Ubuntu 9.04. It seems to be ok. However, when i try to remote to domU the terminal stops working after 1-2 hours. It makes me vey annoyed when installing something and everything stops suddenly. Thanks Tran New Email names for you! Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. Hurry before someone else does!

Hi, The Ping service in Nagios has "unknown" status which was previously OK, this happens after i messed up some of the files owner and accidentally change it to Apache. Although I restored most of the file permission back to Root, the problem above still appears which I suspect is due to permission. Does anybody have idea where to look at. Thanks, junji aisalen.wordpress.com Linux

Hi, There's a linux cluster somewhere (using Rocks), and I use remote desktop (nxmachine) to do the work on the frontend of the cluster. The desktop is Gnome. And, I intend to install new nVidia driver, but it requires me to stop the X Server. I check around the internet, they say we can use the /etc/init.d/gdm stop, but I can't run it since the gdm file does not exist. Another alternative

I've got aide aide-0.13.1-4.el5 running on a server, and aide aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5 running on a similar server. There appears to have been a change in the way base directories are being monitored in the two versions. Both servers are running logical volumes, but it seems to not matter as I'm running aide on a server without logical volumes and the problem still shows up. Now the

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0499 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0499.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4f3ea0a07eba51c9704f76602a5c8f3a460f4e5d8dc7215a0adc1b4b7438fa32 aide-0.13.1-6.el5_8.2.i386.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1119 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1119.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 170c254c937e7ed9b0fe1ce450b9f7e0db7ed7a1b7cf059c9b8e6d801b10a8f9 aide-0.13.1-8.el5.i386.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0539 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0539.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4d43eadcee1c44d276075664f1637811 aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5.i386.rpm Source: 67876a10fc2150a90802ea63cc93bffd aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0539 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0539.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 592b6412a21aede1e3d36ff676d75451 aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 67876a10fc2150a90802ea63cc93bffd aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5.src.rpm --

I am sorry to reply. But I need to clarify things.=0A=0AFrom searching over= the internet, I know that, before R 2.5.0, in the documentation of 'DateTi= meClasses', in 'date + x', in the explanation about 'x', there is also ment= ion that 'x' can be a 'difftime' object. Now, it has been removed.=0A=0AWhy= not doing the same in the documentation of

Hi, Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin. I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter any problems. I used priority=1 and protect=1 on base and updates (addons,extras protect=1 ; set no priorities) for the CentOS-Base repo and on the rpmforge

Having problems with Tripwire on C6, I installed AIDE from the base repository. x86_64 0.14-3.el6_2.2 base 123 k typing: aide result: "Couldn't open file /var/lib/aide/aide.db.gz for reading" (directory is empty and aide.db.gz does not exist.) typing: aide -i (for initialise the Aide database) result: "AIDE, version 0.14 ### AIDE database at

I'm trying out aide since tripwire doesn't seem to be in the 5. releases anymore. I do not have Selinux on the server (no at installation), and I just yum installed the aide rpms, so I should have the latest. When I run my aide --init, I get all of these lines for all the files: lgetfilecon_raw failed for /usr/share/X11/app-defaults/XLogo:No data available I then copy the

Hello All, My username is MikeThompson The link to configure Aide at the bottom of this page: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection Is dead, and says its dead, however, the old link to http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/04/10/centos-5-and-aide/ now redirects to a malicious website. One of my less than savvy users got his windows machine infected there last night. I'm wondering if it

On 02/02/2016 04:27 PM, Mike Thompson wrote: > Hello All, > > My username is MikeThompson > > The link to configure Aide at the bottom of this page: > https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection > > Is dead, and says its dead, however, the old link to > http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/04/10/centos-5-and-aide/ now redirects > to a malicious website. > > One of

One of my servers has recently started giving an error every time I run "aide --check". I ran it manually twice today with the same results. The second time, I added the -V flag, but that didn't give me anything useful. The system is currently running CentOS 5.3. Nothing on the system has changed recently (that I am aware of). The Aide database hasn't been updated in a few

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0512 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0512.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5304c71177d876ec276f4f021e15f4b1b10e3bcafb709469a2a7f891f2dbab6a aide-0.14-3.el6_2.2.i686.rpm x86_64:

I normally don't have yum upgrade anything automatically, but a server that I didn't set up does just that. Last night, aide was upgraded, and then failed to run due to "libgcrypt mismatch". Shouldn't the rpm spec file for aide deal with the libgcrypt problem (meaning I think it should be part of the requirements to upgrade libgcrypt whenever aide is upgraded as some

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0948 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0948.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d4286ed601702ca38db7688ff6c509e0ecd491c173e149546e20f9252e3012f2 aide-0.14-7.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: