similar to: mirrors.centos.org DNS problems?

Hello all, I am having a big issue that i just cant get fixed for a while now and its causing me lots of grief. It seems like since we got FIOS installed (including switching to fios phone lines which are supposed to be the same on our end) i am having massive problems with asterisk not hanging up dead calls for days, even weeks if i dont catch it. It slowly builds up randomly not ending a call

Hi, The problem started when i installed a kodicom 4400 card and started to run zoneminder. Prior to that no problems with my machine, which now runs FreeBSD panix.internal.net 7.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p3 #3: Mon Jul 14 16:35:37 EEST 2008 doroot@panix.internal.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 This hardware change happened in Sunday Jul 13. The next day (Jul 14) morning

I am using Verizon FIOS to my home. I subscribe to a 5 MB down 2 MB up data package. I continue to pay for a standard voice line in addition to the broadband connection only for local calling, fax and emergency 911 use. The way it works is that the fiber optic connection is terminated on the house via an ONT (optical network termination). The ONT can provide connectivity for three types of

Greetings, A long time ago I setup a Linux machine as a Gateway/LAN Server using Verizon DSL as the ISP. I used the following HOWTO as the guide - DSL HOWTO For Linux: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/DSL-HOWTO/index.html Is there something comprable for Verizon FIOS? My Gateway machine runs Fedora. For a new server, I'm considering setting up a CentOS machine, while still using Fedora on my

Hello: Ed Zaleski ran some remarkable and very impressive load tests on icecast reported on www.icecast.org (Home page). What wasn't mentioned in the test specifications was the type of internet line that was used which totally influences bandwidth and subesequent overall load characteristics. Questions: 1. Was it a T1 line, Verizon FIOS, or cable internet, or what? 2. What were the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 Summary: high CPU in sshd after tcp_wrappers deny Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com

I'm using asterisk 1.4.11 and Zaptel version 1.4.5.1 with kernel 2.6.22. I have the ztdummy module loaded, which is using zaptel and rtc. When the ztdummy module is loaded, sounds are not heard when using the asterisk "background" command. When the ztdummy module is unloaded, which also removes zaptel and rtc, sounds are heard. I've also tested this under kernel 2.6.21 with the

I am using asterisk Version: 1:1.4.11~dfsg-1 as found in Debian. I'm using a call file to connect a meetme conference to an AGI script which plays files using the stream_file method. I have four files which should play in sequence, though only the first two files actually play. I get these errors in the CLI: [Sep 16 06:20:43] NOTICE[18424]: app_meetme.c:1911 conf_run: Audio bytes: 276 Buffer

I don't know if this is RedHat 5.1 specific, but be aware that the version of portmap distributed is the enhanced (Wietse Venema) version. That's great, except for two things. The first is documented, but easy to overlook: "In order to avoid deadlocks, the portmap program does not attempt to look up the remote host name or user name...The upshot of all this is that only network

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 Summary: rsync -A drops mask from ACL Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla at baldwin.users.panix.com

Hi folks, Verizon hand just installed FIOS to the side of my house. Anyone know anything about their VoiceWing offering? Is is a SIP offering? Their "technical" staff can only tell me that it's a VoIP service. Mark

Hi, I am relatively new to Asterisk and am looking for help in configuring an IP based phone. This phone is not on the same subnet as the PBX. I read that there could be an issue with NAT so I am bypassing this by connecting temporarily with an Internet IP. So far, I have configured the server extension with the phone MAC address along with configuring the phone unit with IP, Gateway and SIP

Verizon has put another good third party DSL supplier out of the DSL business. Their mindset is to kill the competition and then kill DSL and copper althogether in FIOS areas. So am soon losing my static IP and I need to prepare for the change. I currently have Asterisk running using, besides local extensions, a remote SIP extension in another state. In the new configuration both Asterisk and

That parameter isn't defined in my main.cf file. Is I add it and leave it blank. It still doesn't work. On 2/25/2019 11:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 25.02.19 um 22:39 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba: >> On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >>> Hai Marco, >>> >>> For you own domains, dont point postfix to your

2007/10/15, David W. Tamkin <dattier@panix.com>: > > Harry, > > > so i was wondering what advantages it could give me to make a ffp > > file, because there is already a internally stored md5 checksum on the > > decoded audio data inside the flac file? > > Testing the .flac file against its internally stored fingerprint lets > you know that you have a

On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Marco, > > For you own domains, dont point postfix to your internal DNS only, > if done wrong you might miss dns info on the wan side and thats mostlikely your error . Likely. Here is the error (ignore the ip's - messed them up for this response): Feb 25 16:22:10 sce252 postfix/smtp[3114]: 0D1E86E3A6D: to=<marco

Hello All, I was wondering, is anyone using verizon's fios going into a zaptel 4 port card? If so, has anyone experienced echo issues at all? I am under the assumption that echo issues should be minimal on a ftth connection, but want to confirm if this is the case. I have some customers with nasty echo and fios is an option, but if it's not likely to solve anything, would end up just

Thanks for answering my question guys :) Guess I'll have to try it and find out, but will keep everyone posted... Greg -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:55 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE:

I believe the load test documents state that the load tests were two test machines connected via a gigabit switch. In this sense there was no 'internet line' chokepoint: It was just machine A (server) and machine B (simulating many many listeners) both plugged into the same switch, for a straight through 1gig connection from machine A to B. In your case, with FIOS, I think the usual