similar to: iptables bugs going untended?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "iptables bugs going untended?"

2010 Jul 06
0
97 issues marked 'Ready for Testing'
List, Its been 2 weeks since my previous email and this time I am linking all 97 issues marked 'Ready for Testing' [1]. Simply follow the link, view the available patches, download, compile and install. Report your result into the actual issue, we can them continue to triage the issue. The more testers the better. If you have any problems or questions, jump on #asterisk-testing on
2013 Mar 21
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>wrote: > 2013/3/20 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>: > > Anton, > > > > [+Eric, Nick, > > the e-mail thread context has been broken a few times, so you should > > probably look at the llvmdev archives. > > It all starts here: > >
2002 Sep 10
3
XP woes
Working with Windows XP and debian Samba 2.2.3a on a box as my PDC. Sign or seal patch was applied. The past few days when we have been adding new computers running windows XP to the domain we have had machines tell us they have joined the domain, but when we try to log onto them using a "domain" account we get the following error on the PC: "The system could not log you on to
2011 Mar 31
1
[LLVMdev] [patch] Support PE/COFF in COFFObjectFile, fix some bugs object file readers
Hi, The attached patch does a few separate things. I can split them up if you like but it's pretty small. - Adds support for sniffing PE/COFF files on win32 (.exe and .dll) which are COFF files that have an MS-DOS compatibility stub on the front of them. - Fixes a bug in the COFFObjectFile's support for the Microsoft COFF extension for long symbol names, wherein it
2013 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
Anton, What do you think? 2013/3/20 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>: > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> > wrote: >> >> 2013/3/20 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>: >> > Anton, >> > >> > [+Eric, Nick, >> > the e-mail thread context has been broken a
2013 Mar 27
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
Hi Timur, I myself find the name "Win32" pretty confusing and easy to misuse (especially for someone who assumes that windows == msvc). After all mingw and cygwin is also win32. Maybe we should rename it into isTargetMSVC or something like this? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote: > Anton, > > What do you think? > >
2006 Sep 12
1
DateHelper doesn't handle MonthDays?
I was looking at using the date helper functions for inputing a date for some records, and was highly disappointed to see that they will allow the entry of an invalid date such as Sept 31. It sure would be nice to see the days available change based on the month selected so the user cannot enter an invalid date that must later be reentered. Does anyone know of a plugin or if anyone has
2013 Feb 05
1
Moderated list?
I've been away from this list but reentered recently. Now when I send a question I get an automated answer saying: ------- Your mail to 'R-help' with the subject .............. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post to moderated list ------- Is this the new style of the list? G?ran
2000 Dec 12
1
reinstalling SIGCHLD handler before wait()
HP-UX 11 is looping on SIGCHLD/sigchld_handler2() when exiting a protocol 2 session apparently because we don't call wait before reinstalling the handler. Any thoughts on this issue or how to address it? serverloop.c from latest snapshots: void sigchld_handler2(int sig) { int save_errno = errno; debug("Received SIGCHLD."); child_terminated = 1; signal(SIGCHLD,
2011 Aug 19
2
[LLVMdev] building LLVM for i386 under snow leopard
Hello, Does anyone know how to build LLVM for the i386 architecture with snow leopard (this seems to have been the default for leopard). I've tried building with: ./configure CFLAGS="-arch i386" CXXFLAGS="-arch i386" LDFLAGS="-arch i386" OBJCFLAGS="-arch i386" --prefix=/Users/keith/share/ --enable-shared --enable-jit && make but I still end up
2011 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] building LLVM for i386 under snow leopard
Hi Keith, > Hello, Does anyone know how to build LLVM for the i386 architecture > with snow leopard (this seems to have been the default for leopard). > I've tried building with: > > ./configure CFLAGS="-arch i386" CXXFLAGS="-arch i386" LDFLAGS="-arch > i386" OBJCFLAGS="-arch i386" --prefix=/Users/keith/share/ > --enable-shared
2000 Jul 14
1
Compiling question about the nightly CVS download
I'm doing something wrong but the directions I follow seem simple: tar xvfz vorbis-nightly-cvs.tgz (in /root) cd vorbis ./configure make make install There didn't seem to be any unusual output from configure or make, but make install results in: cat install.sh >install chmod a+x install both of these files are empty. The directories /usr/local/bin, usr/local/man and
2009 Oct 28
1
R 2.10 under Windows XP: glitches and successes
I just installed 2.10 on XP; ESS is my primary interface. I seem to be able to access all the help files; under 2.8.1 I was having seemingly random problems accessing some help topics (including one day I could and a few days later I couldn't, and vice-versa). That's good. I noticed a few glitches. First, the installer asks if you want text, CHM, or HTML help, but offers only text or
2016 Jun 30
1
How can I make llvm intrinsic functions declarations survive from optimizations.
Dear Sanjoy Das and community. I was tried to fix a bug in the pass InitAllocas from SAFECode. This is a function pass and will insert a prototype of 'llvm.memset.p0i8.i32' in the module at doInitialize() stage of the pass. But, this prototype will be eliminated by strip unused function optimization since there is no call on this function after doInitialization(). Therefore there will be
2013 Mar 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
2013/3/20 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>: > Anton, > > [+Eric, Nick, > the e-mail thread context has been broken a few times, so you should > probably look at the llvmdev archives. > It all starts here: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-October/053961.html ] > > So I've decided to make a new attempt to fix this issue. > >
2005 Aug 15
1
DVD-RAM writer software for CentOS4
Firstly, let me thank all of the individuals who assisted me in various matters regarding find, tar and ssh last week. Your contributions were truly invaluable and I learned a great deal thereby. The reason for that brief flurry of activity was an administrative and technical move to store-to-disc from store-to-tape for our server backups. We presently use a mix of store to disc on
2008 Jul 29
1
closing View windows after multiple View(x) crashes
> sessionInfo() R version 2.8.0 Under development (unstable) (2008-07-07 r46046) i686-pc-linux-gnu locale: LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8;LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8;LC_MONETARY=C;LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8;LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils
2013 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
Hi Anton, >From my perspective Win32 is the windows ABI and mingw and cygwin are their own ABIs especially as we're not targeting the MSVC abi, it's just the windows abi? -eric On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>wrote: > Hi Timur, > > I myself find the name "Win32" pretty confusing and easy to misuse > (especially
2013 Mar 21
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
Anton, [+Eric, Nick, the e-mail thread context has been broken a few times, so you should probably look at the llvmdev archives. It all starts here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-October/053961.html ] So I've decided to make a new attempt to fix this issue. We've discussed my patches with Eric and came up with the following idea: a) IsTargetWindows should be true for
2015 Feb 26
1
Workgroup name too long
>> From: schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) >> To: durwin at mgtsciences.com, h.reindl at thelounge.net, > samba at lists.samba.org >> Date: 02/25/2015 06:39 PM >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Workgroup name too long >> Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >> >>>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> >>>> To: samba at